Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Why the Remedy May Be Worse Than the Disease
Townhall.com ^ | March 17, 2020 | Dennis Prager

Posted on 03/17/2020 3:38:55 AM PDT by Kaslin

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-90 next last
To: Kaslin

Dennis needs to contact the admin to offer his expert medical and epidemiological analysis of the situation.


21 posted on 03/17/2020 4:29:33 AM PDT by LouieFisk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

link is not working this morning?


22 posted on 03/17/2020 4:33:50 AM PDT by EBH (DNC=Party NON GRATA)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LouieFisk

It’s the sniffles. We are destroying the economy over a bad cold virus.


23 posted on 03/17/2020 4:38:32 AM PDT by central_va (I won't be reconstructed and I do not give a damn....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: central_va

“We are destroying the economy over a bad cold virus.”

THEY are destroying the econmy using a hoax to interfere with a national election.


24 posted on 03/17/2020 4:40:27 AM PDT by MayflowerMadam ("Worry does not empty tomorrow of its sorrow; it empties today of its strength" - Corrie ten Boom)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: Alberta's Child

We shall see. The global deaths are about 1,000 per day and doubling every 4 days. At a bit shy of 7,000 yesterday it should be 14,000 in 4 days, 28,000 in 8 days. If some 20-40% of the globe population never gets it (for genetic reasons or otherwise) and only some 20% get it here in the US we should only get 40-60 Million catch it and if only 10% of them are seriously ill needing a hospital bed we need 4-6 million excess hospital beds in the next month or two. If only 1 % of the 4-6 million seriously ill die we may only be looking at some 40,000 to 60,000 excess deaths. If the death rate starts to level off in two weeks and we only have 10,000 to 20,000 dead we can probably do this. In a month the 20% that were most genetically likely to become infected will probably have had it. We likely can start to emerge from hiding in two weeks and start the recovery phase. Just rough numbers and estimates but I do think this is likely how it’s going to play out.


25 posted on 03/17/2020 4:43:19 AM PDT by wastoute (Government cannot redistribute wealth. Government can only redistribute poverty.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: Uncle Miltie

some 47% of americans have high blood pressure like me, and are at higher (about double) the risk of death from wuflu.

Just a data point for ya.
**********
That’s your fearful opinion, not data. Are you over 70? Is your blood pressure — and your body weight — thru the roof? If yes to all, quarantine yourself, not the rest of us.


26 posted on 03/17/2020 4:44:26 AM PDT by Socon-Econ (adical Islam,)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Uncle Miltie
some 47% of americans have high blood pressure like me, and are at higher (about double) the risk of death from wuflu.

It's not your high blood pressure. ACE Inhibitors, ARBs, thiazides are all suspect in helping the virus. Calcium channel blockers seem to be OK.

From a correspondence article in The Lancet Respiratory. The theory is backed up by review of who faired the worst in China.

www.thelancet.com/respiratory Published online March 11, 2020 https://doi.org/10.1016/S2213-2600(20)30116-8

27 posted on 03/17/2020 4:45:52 AM PDT by stig
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: ronnie raygun
Could china have used their migrant workers in other countries as a ground zero injection for this pandemic attack?

Many of the factories in Italy have been sold to the Chinese and staffed with Chinese workers. It wouldn't make sense to infect the very workers who keep those plants running.....

28 posted on 03/17/2020 4:46:00 AM PDT by Hot Tabasco (It's the China Flu and if you think you have it, take Zicam......)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: HartleyMBaldwin
I don’t think it’s a dry run for totalitarianism. I think it is nothing more than political posturing by leaders who feel obligated to “do something” in the face of a ludicrous public panic.

There’s one reason why I don’t think this is a dry run for anything. When this all blows over and nothing catastrophic happens, people will feel humiliated about the ridiculous measures they took ... and a lot of them won’t obey the restrictions next time.

29 posted on 03/17/2020 4:47:42 AM PDT by Alberta's Child ("Oh, but it's hard to live by the rules; I never could and still never do.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Hot Tabasco

Now they are saying Iran had construction projects they contracted to Chinese outfits that brought in Chinese workers. There seems to be a theme here. Not saying it was a conspiracy probably just coincidence but Iran and Italy are the two most sick countries right now, France and Germany closing the gap.


30 posted on 03/17/2020 4:52:39 AM PDT by wastoute (Government cannot redistribute wealth. Government can only redistribute poverty.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: Uncle Miltie

Is this accurate? 47% of Americans implies 47% of all Americans. Perhaps you mean 47% of Americans over a certain age have high blood pressure.


31 posted on 03/17/2020 4:56:38 AM PDT by Freee-dame
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: EBH
President Trump has no choice but to appear presidential. He didn’t push this economy off the rails. It started when state/local governments and businesses and industries began imposing their own restrictions.

Once a panic gets started, government leaders are basically forced to react to it. Think of it this way:

Either the disease is a serious threat or it is not. A leader can either react or he can ignore it. That means there are four possible combinations of circumstances here.

1. If the threat is real and the government reacts to it, then the government is acting appropriately.

2. If the threat is real and the government ignores it, you will have political turmoil.

3. If there is no threat but the government reacts to it, then at least people feel confident that the government was being appropriately cautious.

4. If there is no threat and the government does nothing, then life just goes on.

So you see the political calculus at work here: In three of the four scenarios, the response to “Do something!” is the one with the most favorable political outcome.

32 posted on 03/17/2020 4:58:49 AM PDT by Alberta's Child ("Oh, but it's hard to live by the rules; I never could and still never do.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin
RE:”But here is a prediction: If the government can order society to cease functioning, from restaurants and other businesses to schools, due to a possible health disaster, it is highly likely that a Democratic president and Congress will similarly declare emergency and assert authoritarian rule in order to prevent what they consider the even greater “existential threat” to human life posed by global warming. “

Its a thought but right now its the Maryland governor shutting the businesses down in Maryland, not the Federal government.

33 posted on 03/17/2020 4:59:03 AM PDT by sickoflibs (Elect tough guy Joe: Joe wrote the bill that banned the AR-14s)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: EBH

Perhaps this is a big experiment in case there is biological warfare in the future.


34 posted on 03/17/2020 5:01:36 AM PDT by lilypad
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: EBH

Well, I don’t blame President Trump (much). I think he’s doing the best balancing act possible at this time, given the forces against him.

I’m not terrified of the future, exactly, but I don’t like the way things are going at the moment, either.


35 posted on 03/17/2020 5:04:52 AM PDT by HartleyMBaldwin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Alberta's Child

We can hope for a backlash such as you describe, but I’m not all that confident.


36 posted on 03/17/2020 5:06:41 AM PDT by HartleyMBaldwin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: HartleyMBaldwin
Many people will do whatever their government tells them to do because they see themselves as nothing more than human livestock. Others will take notice when facts don’t match the needless hype.

I’ve seen this at work in my own state, where “snow emergency” declarations have been botched so badly (both ways ... where it is used when not needed, and not used when it IS needed) that people are starting to routinely ignore them.

37 posted on 03/17/2020 5:10:22 AM PDT by Alberta's Child ("Oh, but it's hard to live by the rules; I never could and still never do.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

I expect to see at least a trillion $ recovery program to
get the businesses recapitalized and restarted.
It will be tantamount to the student loan program.
The government will force businesses to comply with whatever
is p.c. to qualify for funding.
It will be corrupt.


38 posted on 03/17/2020 5:19:58 AM PDT by Palio di Siena
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin
Agree completely.

This was a test of totalitarian power and a conditioning event. I'm sad to say we passed the test with flying colors. Few people even on free republic felt any push back was in order. I have maintained from the very day the words "lock down" were first uttered that Americans should refuse to comply to these orders no matter what the referenced threat. American's cannot be put on lock down, EVER! If we allow it, then we no longer have a constitution and we are only kidding ourselves that this is still a free country.

39 posted on 03/17/2020 5:30:07 AM PDT by precisionshootist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Uncle Miltie

I think a certain short period of quarantine is warranted, but I agree with Mr. Prager.

I trust our President. He’s a lion of small, private businesses, and he will not let the small guy lose hope.


40 posted on 03/17/2020 5:39:33 AM PDT by poconopundit (Joe Biden has long been the Senate's court jester. He's 24/7 malarkey and more corrupt than Hunter.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-90 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson