Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 03/10/2020 7:47:34 PM PDT by Eddie01
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: Eddie01

Does anyone actually believe that she will? I don’t.


2 posted on 03/10/2020 7:51:18 PM PDT by fwdude (Poverty is nearly always a mindset, which canÂ’t be cured by cash)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Eddie01

She is a self-proclaimed racist. She shouldn’t be hearing any cases.


3 posted on 03/10/2020 7:55:30 PM PDT by BenLurkin (The above is not a statement of fact. It is either opinion or satire. Or both.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Eddie01

“Justices decide for themselves whether to recuse from a case, even though President Trump recently called on Sotomayor and Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg to recuse from anything “Trump-related” that came before the court. Neither responded, and this case is not one that could provide an obvious partisan advantage.”

Big effin deal. She recuses from a meaningless case, so she can “prove” she isn’t biased. She thinks we’re as stupid as she is.


5 posted on 03/10/2020 8:02:13 PM PDT by angmo (America invented the Moon, so we could go there.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Eddie01

Just wow. What’s the catch?


8 posted on 03/10/2020 8:07:32 PM PDT by moehoward
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Eddie01

Ruthieeeee?


9 posted on 03/10/2020 8:07:55 PM PDT by DoughtyOne (Beware Hillary Clinton and the 25th Amendment.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Eddie01

There are two cases challenging the electoral college. Sotomayer is being disingenuous because she can recuse herself from one but still vote her political bias on the other to overturn the electoral college and get the very same result. She knows that. She is a sleazeball


10 posted on 03/10/2020 8:08:42 PM PDT by chuckee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Eddie01

There are no Obama judges. Roberts will say she is the kind of upstanding justice that should rule on the case.


11 posted on 03/10/2020 8:12:22 PM PDT by samadams2000 (Get your houses in order.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Eddie01

RBG should recuse from any case involving Trump policies because of her unethical public comments about trump starting during the election.


12 posted on 03/10/2020 8:14:53 PM PDT by stuckincali
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Eddie01

I’d guess she was somehow told that the cat was out of the bag as far as her friendship with party in question and was given a choice to go quietly and she took it. I see it as a very good sign of Trump’s will being done.


14 posted on 03/10/2020 8:20:46 PM PDT by bramps (It's the Islam, stupid!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Eddie01

She probably got her hands on that info the communist have on Roberts... So he’ll cover for her in any votes...


17 posted on 03/10/2020 9:13:11 PM PDT by SuperLuminal (Where is Sam Adams now that we desperately need him)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Eddie01

A Pedocrat recusing themselves? Srsly?

This is unheard of!


19 posted on 03/10/2020 9:24:21 PM PDT by bkopto
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Eddie01
She got caught :-)
21 posted on 03/10/2020 9:47:06 PM PDT by rdcbn ( Referentiai)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Eddie01

Wow ! An honest liberal.


22 posted on 03/10/2020 9:50:15 PM PDT by Truthoverpower (The guv mint you get is the Trump winning express !)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Eddie01

Obama judge recuses on a case the left is expected to lose in order to cajole Trump judges to recuse on some highly contested future cases?


25 posted on 03/10/2020 9:57:59 PM PDT by McCarthysGhost (q)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Eddie01

This is like a democrat voting for a republican bill that’s popular with their constituents because it’s clear that the rest of the democrats are going to easily defeat the bill regardless. She’s as full of shit as any other leftist.


27 posted on 03/10/2020 10:19:16 PM PDT by youngidiot (The left uses book publishing companies to launder large amounts of cash to other leftist.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Eddie01

So someone wants to have the Supreme Court rule that an item in the Constitution is unconstitutional and thus make a change to the Constitution without the constitutional requirement it be voted and approved by 75% of all States?
Yea sure that sounds right...if we were a Communist Dictatorship.


29 posted on 03/10/2020 10:25:22 PM PDT by Zathras
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Eddie01

When will RBG suspend all her appearances and rulings until Feb 2021 due to Wuhan virus fears?


30 posted on 03/10/2020 10:54:54 PM PDT by ReaganGeneration2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Eddie01

Sotomayor was going to be exposed if she did not recuse herself.

Everyone knew her connection to this woman and, initially, Sotomayor was going to hope the media would stay silent....but then Trump took her on over recusals.

With regard to the cases themselves, if a state can give all its electors to the winner of the popular vote, why not give all electors to a vote taken in Poland?

It is denial of your state’s voice. States can do winner takes all or apportionment based on the state vote, but disregarding the will of the people is not an option.


32 posted on 03/11/2020 2:27:35 AM PDT by Erik Latranyi (The Democratic Party is communism)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Eddie01

WHY IS EVERYONE NOT TALKING ABOUT THIS CASE
IT WILL DECIDE IF WE THE PEOPLE VOTE FOR PRESIDENT OR ABOUT 535 PEOPLE CALLED ELECTORS DO

am I missing something here if electors can do as they choose after becoming a electoral college elector then why in the hell would 330 million people vote ?

If supreme court says they can do as they choose ( faithless electors) then our votes are null n void /// cw2 starts?


33 posted on 03/11/2020 3:57:33 AM PDT by bandit123 (If you think the russians are why Trump is president and not Hillary, then I got a bridge to sell ya)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson