Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Eddie01

“Justices decide for themselves whether to recuse from a case, even though President Trump recently called on Sotomayor and Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg to recuse from anything “Trump-related” that came before the court. Neither responded, and this case is not one that could provide an obvious partisan advantage.”

Big effin deal. She recuses from a meaningless case, so she can “prove” she isn’t biased. She thinks we’re as stupid as she is.


5 posted on 03/10/2020 8:02:13 PM PDT by angmo (America invented the Moon, so we could go there.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: angmo

I am astonished because she did it even on an obscure thing.

Of course, this one might have been so obvious she had no choice.

Like you, I can see things equally obvious where it ain’t gonna happen.


7 posted on 03/10/2020 8:07:23 PM PDT by rlmorel (Finding middle ground with tyranny or evil makes you either a tyrant or evil. Often both.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

To: angmo

This case isn’t meaningless. It has serious implications for that stupid National Popular Vote movement.


39 posted on 03/11/2020 11:32:43 AM PDT by Valpal1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson