[Da Coyote]

What part of “it’s none of your *******ing business where we place our for sale items” do CA kinder-legislators not understand?

[Sans-Culotte]

Mass insanity.

[RitchieAprile]

there are still department stores?

[EagleUSA]

Sick bastards.

[laplata]

That sponsor needs to be put out of his miserable existence.

[Brilliant]

This is what happens when you let the LGBTQs run the government.

[BenLurkin]

Insanity

[rockinqsranch]

This State is out of control seeking to control.

[VTenigma]

I’m pretty sure at this point i’m living in the twilight Zone. These a-holes must be stopped. When was the last time they actually did something good for the country?

[uptowngirl]

Now we know it’s 8 year olds that are running California.

[econjack]

What has an IQ of 192?

The California State Legislature.

[The Toll]

Young boys that are aware of their maleness really frustrated pedos. This is designed to help them molest kids more easily.

[simpson96]

“We’ll tell you what you can sell, and how you can sell it.”

[faithhopecharity]

Rubbish! Californication needs to cut back to a part time legislature. Like one month per year.

[Tolerance Sucks Rocks]

“I was inspired to introduce this bill after 8-year-old Britten asked, ‘Why should a store tell me what a girl’s shirt or toy is?’” Low said.

Please resign now, Evan.

Combined PING! and DANG!

[Mariner]

Why not outlaw the men’s and women’s sections too?

And we CERTAINLY no longer need a pet section.

[NEMDF]

WOW
Because an 8 year old asked a dumb question?

I bet 8 year olds are not their primary customers.

When 8 year olds start doing all of the buying, then they MIGHT listen to 8 year olds.

This is RIDICULOUS.

[Dilbert San Diego]

So then , while this is targeted at children’s items, will this extend to the women’s department and men’s department in stores? Will it eventually be illegal to have racks of dresses in a separate section? Will women’s dresses have to be interspersed with men’s shirts?

And why is California spending time on such nonsense in the first place?

[SaveFerris]

[ConservativeWarrior]

“I was inspired to introduce this bill after 8-year-old Britten asked, ‘Why should a store tell me what a girl’s shirt or toy is?’”

---

BS.

No 8 year old would use this phrasing.

And if we want to go down this road, what right does a handful of legislative dictators have to tell a private merchant what a girl’s shirt or toy is? They are going to have to make that determination if they want to fine a store. Who are they to make that determination?