[kiryandil]

Oddly, the SUpreme Court makeup wasn’t a problem when “Dick” Holder and Æthelblack the Unready were running the show...

[Bon mots]

He should be in prison for gun running. Let’s hope that after the October Trump landslide and massive rout of Democrats the coup plotters and Obama era criminals are brought to justice.

[ktw]

Now that there is a real possibility of a Conservative Supreme Court for decades. He wants term limits. Why wasn’t he pushing this forward when the Liberals had a chance to have a Liberal court? Of course everybody knows the answer...

[Zhang Fei]

10 years is enough.

[wac3rd]

12 for Legislators. 25 for SCOTUS.

[Zhang Fei]

Not so much term limits as much as fixed terms of 10 years at the end of which they must be re-confirmed or returned to the private sector.

[DoughtyOne]

Two hundred and how many years?

Eric Holder knows best?

Gosh Eric, if only you would have been a founding father.

I may not like it that justices like Ginsberg stay on the court too long,
but there isn't a good way to set up removing these justices that won't
wind up being political in the extreme.

The demoⁿcRats have made that perfectly obvious.

[Jonty30]

Only because Trump can remake the court for the next forty years.

How’s Ginsburg doing?

[Starstruck]

Changing the Constitution requires 3/4 of the States to agree along with a majority of the house and Senate. Holder could’t get a simple majority on his side.

[McGruff]

Another crook that should be behind bars.

[Maudeen]

Just another swampter showing his envy of the President.

[Lazamataz]

How about STFU, bongo-head?

[Starstruck]

I’m not saying Holder is totally wrong/ It just depends on who’s Ox is being gored.

[melsec]

If they allowed to make new rules than guess who that will favor. They will then go ahead and place statdards that they will continually hold the right to but wont be held to themsevles. Up’em .

[fwdude]

Democrats. Always changing the rules in the middle of the game when the game isn’t going their way.

[TalBlack]

Democrats ALWAYS want to change the rules when they’re losing.

[ronnie raygun]

18 years sounds good for him and an orange jump suit

[Sacajaweau]

There was a clear reason for "life" term....so the judge would not be political....and need a job after his term was up.

Remember, there is no check on the USSC...They knew it when they wrote it but never figured out a way for a check to occur.......except for a new decision. In other words, precedence is NOT the end all.

And remember, BEFORE roe/wade, there was precedence...you don't kill babies in the womb.

[cranked]

The Idiot needs to just stfu, but that just me......

[null and void]

Apply the same limit to senators. If 8 years is the maximum for a president, 18 should be plenty for a senator, doncha think?