https://twitter.com/randpaul/status/1222947515387072514?s=21
This is the question that Roberts censured.
Even if Rand Paul’s question identified Ciaramella as the leaker (”whistleblower”, wink, wink, nod, nod), there are no grounds for Roberts to refuse to allow it. As has been reported numerous times, the whistleblower statute is to prevent retaliation, not identification.
And Paul’s question did not even purport to identify Ciaramella as the “whistleblower.”
As I see it, Roberts is making things up, like he did in his ObummerCare ruling. The refusal to read Paul’s question makes no sense, and is without grounding, but that apparently does not bother Roberts one iota.