Skip to comments.
Trump lawyers respond to articles of impeachment: 'Constitutionally invalid'
Fox News ^
| January 18, 2020
| Marisa Schultz
Posted on 01/18/2020 2:59:24 PM PST by jazusamo
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-60, 61-80, 81-100, 101-107 next last
To: jazusamo
Lame and dumb argument by POTUS team
61
posted on
01/18/2020 6:34:14 PM PST
by
Mariner
(War Criminal #18)
To: Eleutheria5
62
posted on
01/18/2020 6:37:10 PM PST
by
DoughtyOne
(The Leftistist media and particularly CNN NEWS should come with a ten day supply of Cipro.)
To: jazusamo
63
posted on
01/18/2020 6:38:14 PM PST
by
grey_whiskers
(The opinions are solely those of the author and are subject to change with out notice.)
To: Mariner
64
posted on
01/18/2020 6:47:28 PM PST
by
Mariner
(War Criminal #18)
To: fatima
65
posted on
01/18/2020 7:52:19 PM PST
by
Gator113
( ~~Trump 2020 and again in 2024. EPSTEIN WAS MURDERED. "Seditious Conspiracy" is everywhere.)
To: Gator113
66
posted on
01/18/2020 7:55:15 PM PST
by
fatima
(Free Hugs Today :))
To: Aevery_Freeman
Whoops. My bad. Johnson is obviously who I meant.
67
posted on
01/18/2020 8:50:53 PM PST
by
laxcoach
(Only a fool thinks a child is wise.)
To: laxcoach
The Aticles are unconstitutional.
Neither one of them fit the guidelines for impeachable offenses as described in the Constitution.
68
posted on
01/19/2020 1:56:59 AM PST
by
Syncro
(Facts is Facts)
To: voicereason
I doubt any GOP will defect, though. But they could very well do screwy things for attention. They wont remove Trump but they know the Brown Shirt Media is hovering like vultures just waiting for a Mitt or Collins to give them a great sound bite.
69
posted on
01/19/2020 2:22:04 AM PST
by
wastoute
(Government cannot redistribute wealth. Government can only redistribute poverty.)
To: SecAmndmt
A Texan who passes every vacation in Connecticut should have been a clue.
70
posted on
01/19/2020 2:23:59 AM PST
by
wastoute
(Government cannot redistribute wealth. Government can only redistribute poverty.)
To: jazusamo
...when he asked for investigations into Democrats... No. He asked the Ukrainian president to cooperate with the US Attorney General to investigate an ongoing criminal investigation into the 2016 election.
71
posted on
01/19/2020 3:02:43 AM PST
by
Oldeconomybuyer
(The problem with socialism is that you eventually run out of other people's money.)
To: Jim W N
Why did Trumps lawyers wait for the Articles of Impeachment to cry constitutional foul? 1. Never expose your offense until the last moment
2. Nancy did harm to the Democratic Party with her attempt to satisfied the base. The Libs whipped up their base to a removal, how did she think it was not going to start? President Trump has used the Libs actions against them beautifully, most best political maneuver ever......The Presidents base is fired up going into the election. This has either been the stupidest or most desperate move by Nancy ever! Of course she has to protect the corruption and Deep State, but I repeat myself.
72
posted on
01/19/2020 4:16:06 AM PST
by
Lockbox
To: jazusamo
Help....something has been bothering me since it occurred. Can anyone advise if shiftless’ fictional account of Our President’s call to Ukraine made on the floor of congress remains in the congressional record?? My concern is 50 years from now, if the left hasn’t completely revised history, anyone researching the congressional record will view a completely false accounting of the call. I hope it has been stricken from the record, but I haven’t been able to find evidence of its removal.
Thanks in advance.
73
posted on
01/19/2020 7:09:09 AM PST
by
EODGUY
(God's Will...nothing more....nothing less.....nothing else!)
To: jazusamo
This is so they can always trout that they impeached Trump but the RINOs would not approve it. That is what it is about. Getting even for Slick Willie “the Wh&*# Hopper” Klinton.
74
posted on
01/19/2020 7:12:28 AM PST
by
RetiredArmy
(The Bible tells us the happenings of the Last Days. Those days are HERE! Deny it at your own peril)
To: Jim W N
It's optics, the RATs outdid themselves in treachery and treason and America got to see how they conduct business for "the people".
Never
murder a man who is committing suicide.
75
posted on
01/19/2020 7:32:22 AM PST
by
COUNTrecount
("I've always won, and I'm going to continue to win. And that's the way it is." -- Donald Trump)
To: laxcoach
Wrong. The “offenses” are well described in the Constitution, for which a President may be impeached, tried and removed from office. Just cause the “dems want to, and disagree on policy or person” is not sufficient. Dismissed AND Acquitted of improper charges.
76
posted on
01/19/2020 8:26:25 AM PST
by
John S Mosby
(Sic Semper Tyrannis)
To: struggle
If you give the U.S. Supreme Court the authority to intervene in an impeachment process that Congress is given the sole authority to adjudicate under the U.S. Constitution,
then you are also giving the Court the authority to overturn an acquittal by the U.S. Senate.
Does anyone think that even makes sense?
77
posted on
01/19/2020 8:27:08 AM PST
by
Alberta's Child
(In the time of chimpanzees I was a monkey.)
To: Jim W N
Mark Levin is quite clear on the topic. And he has the ear of the team. McConnell is a major, powerful factor in the conduct of any “proceeding”. And there is the “ace in the hole” against Roberts even being seated, and requiring his recusal— the continuing blackmail of Roberts by obmauamao’s communist minions against the Brazilian adoption of his two Irish children— and the supposed “illegality” of that.
obamaumao is still blackmailing Roberts, as are the democrats. Reason enough for recusal, and also— to stop the proceedings, period. No reason to proceed under these conditions.
78
posted on
01/19/2020 8:31:19 AM PST
by
John S Mosby
(Sic Semper Tyrannis)
To: John S Mosby
The Senate should order a directed verdict and be done with it.
79
posted on
01/19/2020 8:35:27 AM PST
by
Jim W N
(MAGA by restoring the Gospel of the Grace of Christ and our Free Constitutional Republic!)
To: Jim W N
Agree— they are wasting a lot of time, and several of the so called dhimmie “candidates” are sequestered by this time waste, while the actual criminal, Biden will be out mouthing off and his son hiding somewhere so he can't be subpoenaed.
80
posted on
01/19/2020 8:38:34 AM PST
by
John S Mosby
(Sic Semper Tyrannis)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-60, 61-80, 81-100, 101-107 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson