Skip to comments.
Trump lawyers respond to articles of impeachment: 'Constitutionally invalid'
Fox News ^
| January 18, 2020
| Marisa Schultz
Posted on 01/18/2020 2:59:24 PM PST by jazusamo
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-60, 61-80, 81-100, 101-107 last
To: enumerated
I watched all I could stomach today, about an hour's worth. I've never seen so many Power Points fill up my TV screen before! The Dem's insertion of their Power Point slides was so seamless. I was was expecting some sick porn to show up by accident though. All the Dems really needed to show over and over again, to sum up their argument, was just one Power Point : ORANGE MAN BAD Conservative Talk Show host Mark Levin's summary, of what he could have argued before the Senate today, touched on this point, that there was no mention of (a) Treason, (b) Bribery, or (c) High Crimes or Misdemeanors (that is crimes or misdemeanors as serious as, Treason, or Bribery), just some charges that the Dems made up that *do not* fit the Constitutional definition. www.youtube.com/watch?v=2E1mOkNohl8
To: Texan4Life
Power Point slides
They thought they were so clever with their PowerPoints - all the Democrats did today was insult a lot of Senators and bore them to death.
To: Liz; ETCM
>
SCOTUS needs to reinforce the clear language of Article II sec 4 to NEGATE the Houses’s foolish impeachment......it is clearly unconstitutional and illegitimate.
>
S-U-R-E.
Right after they fark (again) the clear English of the 2nd A. (’...shall NOT be infringed.’), the 14th A. (’...AND subject to the jurisdiction thereof...’), as they skip to STEP 20 (like Congress’ ‘ability to tax’ via ACA) instead of beginning @ #1 (by WHAT authority??)...
103
posted on
01/22/2020 10:20:13 AM PST
by
i_robot73
(One could not count the number of *solutions*, if only govt followed\enforced the Constitution.)
To: i_robot73
SCOTUS needs to reinforce the clear language of Article II sec 4 to NEGATE the Housess unconstitutional and illegitimate impeachment.....
......AFTER TRUMP IS ACQUITTED....NOT BEFORE.......
104
posted on
01/22/2020 10:41:52 AM PST
by
Liz
( Our side has 8 trillion bullets; the other side doesn't know which bathroom to use.)
To: GOPJ; Grampa Dave; poconopundit
105
posted on
01/22/2020 10:46:11 AM PST
by
Liz
( Our side has 8 trillion bullets; the other side doesn't know which bathroom to use.)
To: Liz
106
posted on
01/22/2020 9:21:43 PM PST
by
GOPJ
(Will MSNBC bimbos go moist talking to Lev Parnas like they did with Michael Avenatti?)
To: Liz
>
SCOTUS needs to reinforce the clear language of Article II sec 4 to NEGATE the Housess unconstitutional and illegitimate impeachment.....
......AFTER TRUMP IS ACQUITTED....NOT BEFORE.......
>
R-I-G-H-T. Just as much as SCOTUS reinforced the clear lang of the 2nd A.?? I mean, the late, “great” Scalia wrote: “like most rights, the right secured by the Second Amendment is not unlimited...”not a right to keep and carry any weapon whatsoever in any manner whatsoever and for whatever purpose”. Odd he never mentions those last 4 words of the 2nd, let alone the ‘voices’ of our Founders/History (unless it’s precedence [starting > Step1 to bolster their foredrawn conclusion])
I wouldn’t trust SCOTUS (nor govt as a whole), w/ their endless flowerly B.S. legalese to make simpler the plain English of the Constitution.
107
posted on
01/29/2020 5:37:42 AM PST
by
i_robot73
(One could not count the number of *solutions*, if only govt followed\enforced the Constitution.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-60, 61-80, 81-100, 101-107 last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson