Pfffttttt! If princess kama nawannaleiya really was sincere, she could have made the statement more pertinent with a NO vote. A present vote is not a vote. It's an attendance note.
1 posted on
12/20/2019 3:31:52 PM PST by
rktman
To: rktman
Tulsi flaying the Democrat Party alive. You go girl, you go!
2 posted on
12/20/2019 3:33:11 PM PST by
goldstategop
(In Memory Of A Dearly Beloved Friend Who Lives In My Heart Forever)
To: rktman
Pelosi in March: "impeachment must be "compelling and overwhelmingly bipartisan."
Nancy yesterday: "Frankly, I don't care what the Republicans say."
Such a freaking hypocrite
3 posted on
12/20/2019 3:33:25 PM PST by
JaguarXKE
(Liberalism is a cancer on our nation.)
To: rktman
Pfffttttt! If princess kama nawannaleiya really was sincere, she could have made the statement more pertinent with a NO vote. A present vote is not a vote. It's an attendance note. She tried to have both ways and now she looks weak and indecisive.
4 posted on
12/20/2019 3:34:01 PM PST by
Not A Snowbird
(I trust President Trump.)
To: rktman
Exactly. She’s trying to have it both ways. At least AOC is true to her beliefs, as warped as they are. Gabbard is all over the road map wanting to please everybody. A fraud and a fake!
6 posted on
12/20/2019 3:35:56 PM PST by
dowcaet
To: rktman
I look forward to seeing every president impeached for obstruction of congress. Obama got lucky. Today with Eric holder refusing to testify, Obama would have been impeached under the new articles of impeachment. Way to go liberals.
7 posted on
12/20/2019 3:36:18 PM PST by
napscoordinator
(Trump/Hunter, jr for President/Vice President 2016)
To: rktman
Welp, you didn’t vote against it Tulsi, so you are not a leader.
15 posted on
12/20/2019 4:18:22 PM PST by
chris37
(Where's Hunter?)
To: rktman
” A present vote is not a vote. It’s an attendance note.”
She voted no on article II
17 posted on
12/20/2019 4:42:02 PM PST by
DOC44
To: rktman
Another newbie Dem in the House running her mouth. She’s as bad as the dopes in The Squad.
To: rktman
19 posted on
12/20/2019 4:49:24 PM PST by
McGruff
(Does no one is above the law apply to Democrats?)
To: rktman
Then why in the Wide, Wide World of Sports didn’t you vote NO, Gabby, instead of taking the coward’s way out and vote “Not All There?”
21 posted on
12/20/2019 5:08:02 PM PST by
Yo-Yo
( is the /sarc tag really necessary?)
To: rktman
” I always think about what’s in the best interest of the country”.
::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::
The Socialist Hindu is very deep.
22 posted on
12/20/2019 5:10:56 PM PST by
bramps
(It's the Islam, stupid!)
To: rktman
“First of all, throughout my life – whether it was through serving in the military ..."She is starting to sound like Jean effin Kerry.
Thank you for your service Ms. Gabbard but your "present" vote was pure political cowardice.
24 posted on
12/20/2019 5:57:29 PM PST by
TigersEye
(This is the age of the death of reason.)
To: rktman
25 posted on
12/20/2019 6:18:10 PM PST by
NonValueAdded
("Sorry, your race card has been declined. Can you present any other form of argument?")
To: rktman
Exactly. If she has strong convictions about this process not being fair and legit, she had the responsibility to vote AGAINST it. No excuses for her fence-straddling.
26 posted on
12/20/2019 6:40:01 PM PST by
JLLH
To: rktman
She would be the Democrats best chance, for support beyond their party faithful, but she won’t get it.
28 posted on
12/21/2019 8:43:12 AM PST by
Wuli
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson