Posted on 12/08/2019 7:43:27 AM PST by raptor22
Abortion Queen Pelosi playing the Catholic card to justify her actions is no differnt than ISIS’s use of their religion to justify their actions.
When Pelosi talks about her Catholicism, I always think of the practicing Catholic Corleone family in the church for the baby’s Baptism while the murders are being committed on their orders.
Ms. Pelosi is the ultimate hypocrite. She claims to be a devout Catholic, and does not hate anyone except speechless and defenseless babies who are human beings and Americans.
Can Ms. Pelosi explain when a baby in the womb becomes an American and is protected by the Constitution. Is a person in the hospital in induced coma who is speechless and defenseless not an American and not protected by the Constitution? How can the Governor of Virginia ok the murder of a baby after birth. Are those children not Americans; are they not protected by the Constitution? The Governor believes they can be murdered, where do they begin to be protected by the Constitution and the laws of the USA? I wish Ms. Pelosi could explain that to the American people.
You cannot be Catholic and pro-abortion. (Somebody tell the pope.)
When a Catholic runs for office, the left finds out if it is a fake Catholic or a real one. If a real one, like Clarence Thomas, the left destroys him. If a fake, like Sonia Sotomayor, the left supports him.
I read an article once that Pelosi’s husband lives in California and they spend just one week together in Washington.
Interesting point....
The scary thing is that is that leftist Catholics truly believe they are devout Catholics.
She worships power as her first religion.
Excellent. God Bless
Nancy Pelosi falsified the form that certified Obama as eligible, but only to Hawaii, she duped the rest of them into doing it for her.
https://canadafreepress.com/article/dnc-failed-to-certify-obama-as-eligible-in-most-states1””";
Howard Dean was the headof the DNC at that time.
HE was supposed to VET OBAMA before he got very deep into the process.
He is the first SNAKE in the chain-—Pelosi is the #2.
NEITHER MS. PELOSI NOR MR. DEAN WERE GOING TO IGNORE GEORGE SOROS’ DIRECTIVES REGARDING OBAMA. HE WAS RUNNING THE WHOLE SHOW BANKROLLING OBAMA.
If she hates nobody, then being the nation’s greatest cheerleader for slaughtering innocent children paints her as a cold psychopath totally without emotion or empathy. Sounds about right.
Let she who is without sin, cast the first stone.
Talk about a deplorable.
I see n differnce between ISIS killing people..and Pelosi killing baby’s. Pelosi’s actually worse because these once future children have zero defense!
That is up to the local priest, then the next in the line of hierarchy all the way up tp the pope, and those who would deny the ritual wafer and wine to the laity due to this being contrary to their understanding of canon law are apparently a minority.
Until the pope does one of the many things that RCs say we need him for, and require denial of the Catholic ritual to even proabortion, prosodomy public figures, rather than manifestly considering them to be members in life and in death, then priests and laity can do the latter.
Indeed,
'the one duty of the multitude is to allow themselves to be led, and, like a docile flock, to follow the Pastors," "to suffer themselves to be guided and led in all things that touch upon faith or morals by the Holy Church of God through its Supreme Pastor the Roman Pontiff," "of submitting with docility to their judgment," with "no discussions regarding what he orders or demands, or up to what point obedience must go, and in what things he is to be obeyed... not only in person, but with letters and other public documents ;" and 'not limit the field in which he might and must exercise his authority, " for "obedience must not limit itself to matters which touch the faith: its sphere is much more vast: it extends to all matters which the episcopal power embraces," and not set up "some kind of opposition between one Pontiff and another. Those who, faced with two differing directives, reject the present one to hold to the past, are not giving proof of obedience to the authority which has the right and duty to guide them," "Nor must it be thought that what is expounded in Encyclical Letters does not of itself demand consent." (Sources )
That is not analogous, since Muhammad clearly exhorted/required religious violence and engaged in it himself, while at least on paper Catholicism condemns abortion.
But what her stand as a Catholic shows is that Rome understands canon law as not requiring her to be manifestly excommunicated, rather than being accepted as a member, like Ted Kennedy and a host of other proabortion, prosodomy public figures
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.