The Democrats’ impeachment inquiry is not the organic outgrowth of serious misconduct; it is an orchestrated campaign to upend our political system. The Democrats are trying to impeach a duly elected President based on the accusations and assumptions of unelected bureaucrats who disagreed with President Trump’s policy initiatives and processes. They are trying to impeach President Trump because some unelected bureaucrats were discomforted by an elected President’s telephone call with Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky. They are trying to impeach President Trump because some unelected bureaucrats chafed at an elected President’s “outside the beltway” approach to diplomacy.
(more, much more)
Thanks for posting
The Trump presidency was not the “will of the American people.” It was the will of the members of the Electoral College who cast their votes in Trump’s favor. It was a sign of his business sense that he figured out which states to emphasize so he could win when receiving a minority of votes by the American people. He had years of putting together shaky deals and successfully manipulated banks when he had very little available money. I just wish I could be sure that he is using Putin, and not the other way around.
Regarding the need for evidence, unfortunately President Trump provides some every time he opens his mouth or tweets. Did we not just hear him urge China to investigate Biden corruption? Even if it is a joke, that is only fit for a TV show, not the presidency. He demeans the presidency and the USA with that kind of stuff and I’m sure makes Comrade Putin very happy. By making a joke of our political processes he is also encouraging the worse instincts of some of his most ardent supporters.
Bunch of butt hurt asswipes that need to be removed from our country for trying to overthrow our elected president by un-elected bureaucratic manipulation.
The Democrats in the House should be held personally financially responsible for the cost of the impeachment hearings. Can President Trump sue these rats for libel?
Very well presented. I read it in its entirety. Thanks for posting it here.
Worth saving. Thanks!
:o]
‘Face
TU for posting
Wait, I know the answer.
NEVER, right?
If the House votes to impeach Trump, get used to seeing the phrase "Impeached President Trump". Even if the Senate doesn't vote to remove him.
THEY DON'T CARE IF THERE IS ABSOLUTELY NO EVIDENCE. EVERY time Trump is reported on in the future, that moniker will be there.
How many times have you seen "Failed Presidential Candidate Hillary Clinton"??
Maybe once? More often it is "Former Secretary of State", "Former First Lady".
The Leftocrat media and their lapdogs in the House will use that in an effort to win the 2020 election.
Get used to it.
I was just listening to what I thought was Tom Shillue doing another parody of Schiff, when I discovered to my shock that it really was Adam Schiff! And he was serious as he spewed out lie after lie after lie. It was him rolling out his impeachment report—NOT A PARODY! NOT SHILLUE! Scary.
I have a question for anyone to address. What kind of military aid did the Obama regime give the Ukrainians when the major Russian offensives to seize the Crimea began, I believe about 7 years ago? List the weapons, not the night goggles, MREs or blankets.
Question: When Pres. Trump gave the Ukrainians anti-tank Javelin missiles, were they used in combat against Russian tanks (often manned by Russian soldiers disguised as Ukrainian insurgents or by pro-Russian Ukrainians who had Russian training)?
This is important because if Obama FAILED/REFUSED to give the Ukrainian Army absolutely necessary arms to stop Russian tanks and possibl7y Thermobaric artillery concentrations, then OBAMA needs to be called as a material witness before the Sen. Judiciary, Armed Services and Foreign Affairs committees because it, as Schitt for Brains would claim, directly affected the national security of the United States.
If Javelins were used by the Ukrainians against the Russian/Ukrainian insurgents when received from the U.S., what were their effects? Did it stop tank columns from invading or continuing inside Ukraine? Did it turn the tide of battle and make what was once a powerful Russian Tank/Artillery offensive into a quagmire for them (Russian troops were largely withdrawn after the Ukrainian counter-offensives drove them and their Ukrainian traitors back to their eastern strongholds?
WHO succeeded in aiding the Ukrainians during the war, Obama or Trump?
Once you answer that, this whole impeachment Soviet-style show trial goes down the crapper along with the toilet-paper Democrat congressional reports.
This is good to see. I would like to see what the outcome is from the Democrat side. The spin will likely make us dizzy.
Tell you what, if President Trump has managed to accomplish the great things he has promised to do despite these shameful proceedings, can you just imagine what he could do for our country if they’d just leave him alone for 5 minutes?
They’re nothing but pesty gnats, wasting precious time and taxpayer money doing absolutely nothing for anyone.
We can’t like everything about everyone and it’s high time those spoiled, entitled brats in Congress learn that they work for US - and that goes for BOTH sides of the aisle!