Democrats Consider Three Articles of Impeachment

Breitbart ^ | 11/07/2019 | Joshua Caplan

[gswilder]

House Democrats have reportedly weighed drafting three articles of impeachment against President Donald Trump, sparked by a so-called “whistleblower’s” mischaracterization of the president’s phone call with the leader of Ukraine......

[Drango]

Plus he hurt their feelings...

[fruser1]

They’re going to need some nouns and verbs.

[dp0622]

What does the number mean?

What’s the difference between 1 or 10?

Are they saying three different crimes were committed?

A##holes.

thanks ahead of time.

[CatOwner]

Predicted by many quite some time ago, and most were ridiculed for thinking it. Just because people thinks it’s stupid doesn’t mean it won’t happen. And while conviction remains a bit of a long-shot (GOP Senate does not give me a warm fuzzy here), that was never the must-have. It was to neuter Trump and re-take Congress. They’ve done that with the House, and the Senate is next.

[Alberta's Child]

If an article of impeachment is drafted against President Trump for "contempt of Congress" I might seriously consider donating the maximum allowable amount to his campaign.

I have nothing but contempt for that bunch of pr!cks myself.

[Drango]

Contempt of Congress is NOT a high crime and misdemeanor.

Neither are the other alleged crimes.

[Ken H]

Too bad for them the (sham)impeachment is losing support and Trump’s numbers are rising. This thing is a fizzle.

[Hugh the Scot]

There won’t be an impeachment vote before the election.

[rigelkentaurus]

If contempt of congress was a crime, the vast majority of the country would need to be in jail.

[AAABEST]

They should do this and let it go to the senate, where we gt discovery and call witnesses, including the Bidens, the fake "whistleblower" and Adam Sh**-for-brains.

DO IT.

[Sequoyah101]

Drum roll please for the demonrats bull spit “charges” once again proving that a grand jury can indict a ham sammich.

Impeachable offense is anything they want it to be I guess.

[beethovenfan]

Three pieces of $hit.

[TexasFreeper2009]

3 or 100 it doesn’t matter, nothing will come up it.

[Secret Agent Man]

And a bunch of congresscritters would be in jail too.

[TexasFreeper2009]

4th article is just because “orange man bad!”

ROFL

[tcrlaf]

Prediction: Democrat “Impeachment Articles” will just happen to magicly match the criminal referrals in the IG report. Any takers???

[Colinsky]

No, no, you heard us all wrong, one of the representatives’ little kids were demanding ice cream, and we’re sending out for the imp’s peach mint.

[glennaro]

The Left's whacked-out base will indeed be thrilled, but for a very short time as they come to realize Trump is still there, Trump is more popular than ever and the Left's impeachment debacle may very well secure a complete victory in the Executive and Legislative branches and significantly impact the make-up of the Judicial Branch for the next five years.

It may take until early next year, but when the Left's whacked-out base stumbles out of their stupor and realizes what the Democrat/Left Party has again done to them ... well ... that's when the fun really begins!

[Alberta's Child]

The biggest warning sign against Congress in this case may have come from the deep-blue state of New Jersey, of all places.

Jeff Van Drew is a Democrat who won his election in the 2nd District in 2018. He was one of only two Democrats in the House to vote against the "impeachment authorization" last week.

He must have known something was up, because they just had a special election in the New Jersey State Senate to fill the seat he had vacated after representing it for ten years. This state district has two Democratic Assembly members, and the Democrat appointed to fill Van Drew's seat temporarily in the Senate LOST on Tuesday.

If this is what the voters are saying in New Jersey, I'd say there is a huge danger lurking beneath the surface for the Democrats nationwide in next year's election.