There’s no law prohibiting disclosure of his name. What are they afraid of?
They're afraid of the TRUTH - they'd much rather smear and innocent man and watch a hostile takeover of the government.
They're sick, jaundiced bastards who need to be turned off and put out of business.
I suspect there is no whistleblower. Instead, there are probably 4-6 people who could be credibly identified as “the whistleblower” at any time in the next 48 hours — or 48 years.
This is why Schiff is refusing to identify the so-called “whistleblower.” He probably has sworn affidavits from all 4-6 people who would fit the description of the original source in the U.S. government who has coordinated this idiocy with Schiff and his staff.
Lord knows there are plenty of disgruntled misfits in Washington who would be willing to take on that role.
The lawyer has threatened to sue based on the release of the name causing the rat harm
On the first look, that looks like an empty blow hard threat.
But think about it. The guy is a top rated candidate for arkanside.. He knows entirely too much about obummer, hillary, brannon and the rest of them.
So many that it would be hard to figure out who did it.
So the lawyer could make someone miserable.
We all know the name so this is a lot of noise about nothing.
They don’t like the President. They want him impeached.
#4 The truth.
They want to also keep people tuning in to the soap opera they are making.
“There’s no law prohibiting disclosure of his name. “
Not to worry.
He’ll be compelled to testify at the impeachment trial, as will Schiff and his senior staff. And his attorneys.
This will not be a good look for Democrats.
And I believe they are starting to realize it. I can smell the panic. So can you.
When was the last time we heard a bold pronouncement from a prominent Dim?
Sean Hannity or Laura Ingraham should live guide their audience to whistleblower’s identity online