Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: goldstategop
I can think of one good reason not to publicize the name:

I suspect there is no whistleblower. Instead, there are probably 4-6 people who could be credibly identified as “the whistleblower” at any time in the next 48 hours — or 48 years.

This is why Schiff is refusing to identify the so-called “whistleblower.” He probably has sworn affidavits from all 4-6 people who would fit the description of the original source in the U.S. government who has coordinated this idiocy with Schiff and his staff.

Lord knows there are plenty of disgruntled misfits in Washington who would be willing to take on that role.

35 posted on 11/06/2019 3:34:19 PM PST by Alberta's Child ("In the time of chimpanzees I was a monkey.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]


To: Alberta's Child

Do some research on the faux-WB’s lawyer, who probably wrote the multi-page statement. His surname is Zaid and he’s been beating the drum for impeachment since Jan. 2017.


124 posted on 11/07/2019 12:48:37 AM PST by octex
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies ]

To: Alberta's Child

“I suspect there is no whistleblower.”

The whistleblower is Schiff’s invisible friend. There is no whistleblower. Like his dramatic reading before Congress, WB is made up.


128 posted on 11/07/2019 3:29:45 AM PST by MayflowerMadam ("I've read the back of The Book, and we win.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson