Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Talks halt between whistleblower lawyers and Schiff staff amid expectation he won’t testify
Washington Examiner ^

Posted on 10/31/2019 4:10:50 PM PDT by Bigtigermike

Full title: 'No further discussion': Talks halt between whistleblower lawyers and Schiff staff amid expectation he won’t testify.

The whistleblower whose complaint launched impeachment proceedings against President Trump is unlikely to testify to Congress, as talks have ceased between his legal team and committee leaders.

House Intelligence Committee Chairman Adam Schiff, who has overseen depositions in Democrats' impeachment proceeding, was initially eager for the whistleblower to testify before citing concern about the person being identified.

Republicans accuse Schiff, a California Democrat, of changing course to prevent inquiries into his staff's dealings with the whistleblower before he filed his Aug. 12 complaint to the Intelligence Community inspector general.

A source familiar with the discussions told the Washington Examiner that talks halted over potential testimony from the whistleblower and there is no discussion of testimony from a second whistleblower, who supported the first's claims.

“There is no indication that either of the original whistleblowers will be called to testify or appear before the Senate or House Intelligence committees. There is no further discussion ongoing between the legal team and the committees,” the person said.

(Excerpt) Read more at washingtonexaminer.com ...


TOPICS: Front Page News; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: ciaramella; impeachment; schiff; traitors; trump; ukraine; whistleblower
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-92 next last
To: Gay State Conservative

Does a man think he can single handedly remove a president, and then go about anonymously? I think not. If Seth Rich couldn’t survive, neither can Ciamarella.


61 posted on 10/31/2019 7:04:21 PM PDT by healy61
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies]

Comment #62 Removed by Moderator

To: lodi90

Wasn’t it Mitch that punted this to Senate Intelligence vs. Judicial? Burr and Warner are the top dogs that lead Intelligence committee. I read that it should have gone to the Senate Judicial Committee but McConnell knowing Burr and Warner would do nothing and won’t really fight for our President, assigned it to them.

So all of this Senate will fight for Trump is a dog and pony show.


63 posted on 10/31/2019 7:24:27 PM PDT by Engedi (ui)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: cld51860

This coward tainted himself. He’s no longer trustworthy to even his own side now.


64 posted on 10/31/2019 7:48:26 PM PDT by HollyB
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Bigtigermike

So their second hand info “witness” won’t testify? So without a witness it seems they have less than nothing.


65 posted on 10/31/2019 8:09:21 PM PDT by Blood of Tyrants (Everyone who favors socialism plans on the government taking other people's money, not theirs.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: HKMk23

An M1 or FAL will be fine.


66 posted on 10/31/2019 8:19:12 PM PDT by Blood of Tyrants (Everyone who favors socialism plans on the government taking other people's money, not theirs.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Bigtigermike

https://www.realclearinvestigations.com/articles/2019/10/30/whistleblower_exposed_close_to_biden_brennan_dnc_oppo_researcher_120996.html

Here is an article outing the guy. Its worth the read.


67 posted on 10/31/2019 8:39:50 PM PDT by poinq
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Bigtigermike

He will testify under Senate subpoena during the impeachment trial.

That is certain.

Even if all he does is plead the 5th.


68 posted on 10/31/2019 9:28:14 PM PDT by Mariner (War Criminal #18)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Bigtigermike
SO, call him up in a Senate committee and have him testify under oath.

And do it before he commits Arkancide.

69 posted on 11/01/2019 2:42:45 AM PDT by eartick (Stupidity is expecting the government that broke itself to go out and fix itself. Texan for TEXIT!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: offduty

The house cannot do it since they are the minority but the damn Senate under Mcturtle could.


70 posted on 11/01/2019 2:45:15 AM PDT by eartick (Stupidity is expecting the government that broke itself to go out and fix itself. Texan for TEXIT!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: lodi90
POTUS is flying solo inside the beltway, basically.

I agree with you. It is starting to seem more and more like Mcturtle and company will role over when it comes to a vote.

Keep your powder dry and a light coat of oil on ol Bessy.

71 posted on 11/01/2019 2:49:00 AM PDT by eartick (Stupidity is expecting the government that broke itself to go out and fix itself. Texan for TEXIT!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: Bigtigermike

It’s to protect them (and their handlers) from charges of treason - they were never gonna testify...
They now need to watch their backs before they hang themselves or some other form of “suicide”...


72 posted on 11/01/2019 3:32:27 AM PDT by trebb (Don't howl about illegal leeches, or Trump in general, while not donating to FR - it's hypocritical.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Bigtigermike
"House Intelligence Committee Chairman Adam Schiff, who has overseen depositions in Democrats' impeachment proceeding, was initially eager for the whistleblower to testify before citing concern about the person being identified."

What the heck is he afraid of.? Nobody tried to whack Hanoi Jane, and she was the most disgusting, filthy traitor who ever walked on this side of the planet...

73 posted on 11/01/2019 4:37:57 AM PDT by unread (Joe McCarthy was right.......)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DoughtyOne; offduty; Bigtigermike; shelterguy; butlerweave; janetjanet998; HKMk23; cld51860; ...
I also bet the dynamic was that Ciaramella was inclined to do this stupidity, was motivated to do this stupidity, but the one brain as a Leftist that was still functioning probably warned him not to do it.

I have no doubt that Ciarmella (Pronounced "CHAR-a-mella") was convinced by various people orchestrating this (because there is no doubt it is orchestrated) that there would be no "risk" to him, he would never be called on to testify, he only had to kick the thing off and the "whistleblower" status would protect his anonymity. So Ciaramella probably thought he could "do his part" with little risk. Because Leftists can't think one step ahead.

Why is "interesting" that his name is pronounced "CHAR-a-mella"?


There were texts between Strzok and Page said the following:

Strzok: Talking with Bill. Do we want Joe to go with Evanina instead of Charlie for a variety of reasons?

Page: Hmm. Not sure. Would it be unusual to have [sic] show up again? Maybe another agent from the team?

Strzok: Or, he's "the CI guy." Same. might [sic] make sense. He can assess if thete [sic] are any news [sic] Qs, or different demeanor. If Katie's husband is there, he can see if there are people we can develop for potential relationships

Page: Should I ask Andy about it? Or Bill want to reach out for andy?

Strzok: I told him I'm sure we could ask you to make the swap if we thought it was smart. It's not until Mon so Bill can always discuss with him tomorrow.


As this article by Debra Heine at PJ Media points out, these texts are a clear indication of a spying campaign on the Trump Presidency. Not the Trump Campaign. The Trump Presidency. They are discussing the placement of a spy INSIDE the Trump White House.

And the question that many people were asking when they saw these texts was: Who is "Charlie"?


There is a great article at RealClear Investigations John Sperry: The Beltway's 'Whistleblower'Furor Obsesses Over One Name (Dan Bongino has been beating this drum)

"...Federal documents reveal that the 33-year-old Ciaramella, a registered Democrat held over from the Obama White House, previously worked with former Vice President Joe Biden and former CIA Director John Brennan, a vocal critic of Trump who helped initiate the Russia “collusion” investigation of the Trump campaign during the 2016 election.

Further, Ciaramella (pronounced char-a-MEL-ah) left his National Security Council posting in the White House’s West Wing in mid-2017 amid concerns about negative leaks to the media. He has since returned to CIA headquarters in Langley, Virginia.

“He was accused of working against Trump and leaking against Trump,” said a former NSC official, speaking on condition of anonymity to discuss intelligence matters.

Also, Ciaramella huddled for “guidance” with the staff of House Intelligence Committee Chairman Adam Schiff, including former colleagues also held over from the Obama era whom Schiff’s office had recently recruited from the NSC. Schiff is the lead prosecutor in the impeachment inquiry.

And Ciaramella worked with a Democratic National Committee operative who dug up dirt on the Trump campaign during the 2016 election, inviting her into the White House for meetings, former White House colleagues said. The operative, Alexandra Chalupa, a Ukrainian-American who supported Hillary Clinton, led an effort to link the Republican campaign to the Russian government. “He knows her. He had her in the White House,” said one former co-worker, who requested anonymity to discuss the sensitive matter..."


So, to summarize: It is most likely that mysterious "Charlie" whose identity was being speculated on ever since the texts from Strzok and Page came out is very likely Ciaramella. (CHAR-a-mella). The "Whistelblower". The same person who was a registered Democrat who has direct ties to Biden, Brennan, Schiff, and most damningly, Alexandra Chalupa, and had left the NSC and returned to the CIA in 2017 because he was suspected of leaking.

THAT "Charlie" Ciaramella. Is it ANY surprise the Left and the Media expended every resource and tactic they could muster to protect the identity of this "concerned, patriotic government servant"?

74 posted on 11/01/2019 6:07:01 AM PDT by rlmorel (Trump to China: This Capitalist Will Not Sell You the Rope with Which You Will Hang Us.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: rlmorel

Good call. Seems likely the players are the same in both Russian hoax and Ukraine hoax. This is Mueller all over again. Right down to the GOP Senate doing nothing as the coupists attack POTUS.


75 posted on 11/01/2019 6:09:59 AM PDT by lodi90
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 74 | View Replies]

To: DoughtyOne

Sean Misko the conspirator’s associate ties this back to the Hillary 2016 Presidential campaign:

https://www.redstate.com/streiff/2019/10/11/adam-schiffs-committee-employs-least-two-former-colleagues-whistleblower-collusion/


76 posted on 11/01/2019 6:15:56 AM PDT by Freedom of Speech Wins
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: rlmorel

Interesting thought, however, at first read it sounds like “Charlie” may be a FBI investigator who is part of Mueller’s team. I’m curious who “Katie” and her husband may be and how they fit in the picture as it sounds as if he may be another mole who is trying to recruit people within the Executive to spy on Trump.

Regardless...this cancer runs deeper than I think most of us thought and it is going to take a Herculean effort to root out this evil. I’m afraid the squishy RINO’s that are currently representative of the Republican party are complicit in the Deep State and must be excised as well.

The country is spiraling towards another civil war and I wonder if the nation can survive this one.


77 posted on 11/01/2019 6:22:13 AM PDT by offduty
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 74 | View Replies]

To: rlmorel
CHAR-boy forgot to read the disclaimers about the consequences of participating in a "bad act."


78 posted on 11/01/2019 6:47:56 AM PDT by ptsal
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 74 | View Replies]

To: offduty
From the PJ Media article:

"...The "Katie" mentioned by Strzok, may be the wife of Josh Pitcock, Pence's chief of staff. [See update below. Pitcock on Friday denied that there was any infiltration into the Trump transition team through him or his wife]..."

Why anyone would keep on any "holdovers" from an Obama administration is beyond me. I know there is continuity to consider, but the risks seem to outweigh that to me.

79 posted on 11/01/2019 6:54:08 AM PDT by rlmorel (Trump to China: This Capitalist Will Not Sell You the Rope with Which You Will Hang Us.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 77 | View Replies]

To: Lurker
Useless Graham could drop a couple of subpoenas.

At minimum, Graham should write a public letter to Pelosi, Schiff, Nader, and Schumer with a list of swamp creatures that will be called to testify in a Senate trial, including Comey, Brennan, McCabe, Clapper, Stzrok, Lisa Page, Simpson, Halper, and Misfud’s recorded deposition —

— and yes, pajama boy Eric and Schiff.

Watch how quickly this gets shut down...

80 posted on 11/01/2019 7:08:33 AM PDT by Magnatron
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-92 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson