Posted on 10/29/2019 12:29:35 PM PDT by where's_the_Outrage?
That is exactly what is going on. That and an accusation of guilt built on nothing.
It very much is a witch trial.
This IS a disgrace this needs to be taken to court both sides MUST be able to call witnesses!!!
They don't have to vote. Democrats have a 36 seat majority, so a lot of those representatives can avoid having a vote recorded and the Democrats can still carry the motion.
It asserts the Democrats should have unlimited power to compel testimony by subpoena (harassment) of Trump supporters, or even the President himself, while Republicans may take actions only with the consent of the Democrat chairman.
The conclusions of the Committee are already written. They only need to fabricate a plausible excuse for them. Perjury will be no obstacle to this.
"Show me the man and I will show you the crime".
We are passing yet another milestone in the ongoing Civil War II. It will go hot at the finale.
Because Democrat Facists march in lock step with their insane Leadership. All the nonsense they spewed about their “moderate anti Pelosie” views was just lies to get elected in 2018.
We saw it on the Obamacare vote in 2009. The Freshmen Dems lemming like lined up to vote for it despite everything their constituents were telling them. The voters then dropped the axe on them in 2010 but the Democrat Fascist leadership did not care. The Leadership got what they wanted so why should they cares about a bunch of dumb hick Democrats from flyover land?
What evidence..they have the freakin TRANSCRIPT..that is the only piece of “Evidence” anyone needs..some agree with the phone call and others dont..its called their OPINION..this is a foreign policy issue, they dont like it, vote for someone else
Well said - They were expendable
This will be Exhibit A in the treason indictment against the Democrats.
The evidence I was referring to is whatever reason the minority member wants to bring in the new material or witnesses. So the member must outline ahead of time exactly what the additional evidence or witnesses will contribute to the hearing. I agree with you that there is no evidence of high crimes or misdemeanors here.
No court has authority over impeachment.
remember when Schitt got Nunes thrown off the committee for 6 months on some bogus ethics charge (actually Nunes voluntarily recused)
Didn’t Nan tell the reporter chick there will be “no resolution” there in the hallway yesterday?
Then no court has authority over the Trump administration simply ignoring any purported removal of him from office.
You are looking for some coherency of thought or actions to this ‘process’?
This is disgusting these bastards are doing every damn thing they can to change public opinion WITH LIES!!!
VERY GOOD POINT!!!
I just heard the vote will be electronic, i.e.: secret.
Well, the Constitution says, “The House shall have the power of impeachment”, and it says “The Senate shall try all impeachments”, and it says “The President and other officers shall be removed with the concurrence of 2/3 of the Senators present and voting”, so I don’t think you have much of a case.
This is an utter outrage! Where is the money coming from to fund these “INVESTIGATIONS”? Who is watching the investigators? If these are taxpayer funds, then there must be an accounting for this sham investigation by these threadbare politicians.
I would ask for unanimous consent to enter all statements from current House members and pres statements into the Congressional record (...”impeet fowty fie”, “we’re gonna impeach the MF’er”, and Nancy’s statement that ‘none of us were elected to impeach the President’) and all early statements, going back to plans to impeach Trump before he took office, the days following the inauguration, and all impeachment comments made by House members and media during every month from January 2017 to date.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.