Posted on 10/24/2019 11:02:20 PM PDT by knighthawk
MSNBC star Rachel Maddow was on the defensive Thursday night after multiple reports said the Justice Department investigation into the origins of the Russia inquiry had shifted into a criminal probe.
Maddow, who had beeen the face of MSNBC's coverage of the two-year investigation into alleged collusion between Russia and the Trump campaign, was baffled at the opening of her show Thursday night by the ongoing investigation from U.S. Attorney John Durham, whom Attorney General William Barr had appointed earlier this year.
"This is the news that honestly, we've been sort of expecting for some time or thinking that if things got really bad, it might come to this," Maddow told her viewers. "As of tonight, according to the New York Times, it has come to this."
(Excerpt) Read more at foxnews.com ...
Ms. Bovine spongiform encephalopathy has lost her mind
https://www.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.dcd.191592/gov.uscourts.dcd.191592.129.2.pdf
Perhaps the above explains (1) why DOJ is now investigating its own conduct; and (2) why the investigation is now a criminal investigation?
Good post.
It’ll be amusing to read some day soon that the ongoing investigation from U.S. Attorney John Durham discovered the CIA/FBI were spoonfeeding leaks to MSNBC.
Has she ever said anything that was true
Can Maddow be a criminally liable conspirator?
Maddow appears to be ignorant of the fact it is a crime to attempt to frame someone for a crime they did not commit. And in this case, the frame job was for the purpose of overturning an election, a crime in itself.
“she”???
Wow. So baffling we would look into terrorist communists looking to overthrow the country along with the help of the like of a Castro or Mullah in Iran etc...
Time to feed the hogs
Going down with her schitt
I love the opening sentences on page 5!
US Chapter 115
US Code - #2384
Seditious conspiracy
If two or more persons in any State or Territory, or in any place subject to the jurisdiction of the United States, conspire to overthrow, put down, or to destroy by force the Government of the United States, or to levy war against them, or to oppose by force the authority thereof, or by force to prevent, hinder, or delay the execution of any law of the United States, or by force to seize, take, or possess any property of the United States contrary to the authority thereof, they shall each be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than twenty years, or both.
That last was a good one!
Yes. On election night 2016 her last words as she signed off were, "He's our president."
My lib father in law believes every word that comes out of Madcows mouth.
In this case, high-ranking FBI officials orchestrated an ambush-interview of the new president’s National Security Advisor,
not for the purpose of discovering any evidence of criminal activity—they already had tapes of all the relevant conversations about which they questioned Mr.
Flynn—
but for the purpose of trapping him into making statements they could allege as false.
From your link:
“The government still hides countless damaging texts—exculpatory and material to Mr.Flynn—that our independent work only recently uncovered. “
Git’er done!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.