Posted on 10/23/2019 6:31:03 AM PDT by Kaslin
PARIS -- Former U.S. Secretary of State Hillary Clinton and Canadian Conservative Party leader Andrew Scheer now have something in common. They can both spend the rest of their lives complaining that they won the popular vote but still lost a national election.
Canadian Prime Minister Justin Trudeau kept his job but lost the popular vote in Monday's federal election. Conservatives won 34.4 percent of the popular vote, while Liberals won 33.1 percent -- a difference of more than 243,000 votes. Trudeau's Liberal Party lost its parliamentary majority, falling 13 seats short of the 170 required to ram through whatever new legislation he wants. Still, Trudeau won. There will be no massive outcry about the electoral map or seat distribution.
Clinton's camp blamed her loss on the Electoral College, Russian President Vladimir Putin and self-hating women who committed treason against their gender by voting for Donald Trump. While there may have been an appetite for that kind of whining among Clinton's establishment supporters, Canadians have zero appetite for post-electoral whining, let alone the kind that lasts for years.
There has never been an instance in Canada where the credibility of a national election was contested by the losers all the way up to the next election. It would be one thing if the Trump presidency represented an anomaly in U.S. politics, but it doesn't. When George W. Bush defeated Al Gore for the presidency in 2000 despite losing the popular vote, for the next eight years we were bombarded with whining that Bush had "stolen" the election and somehow wasn't a legitimate president.
Post-electoral behavior in Canada reflects a stark difference between the two countries, which otherwise have far more in common than not, culturally speaking. Once a Canadian election is over, everyone is expected to become pragmatic for the sake of the country. And at no time does this hold more true than when Canadian voters issue a minority government mandate like they did this week. What this means for Trudeau is that voters don't like what he's done enough to continue giving him carte blanche to do whatever his party wants. Voters have forced him into a situation where he has to convince at least one other smaller party with at least 13 seats to vote along with his centrist Liberal Party in order to pass legislation.
The question is: Which smaller party will be the kingmaker? Since the Conservatives aren't likely to start voting in favor of legislation proposed by the Liberals, Trudeau's options will be reduced to an alliance with either populism or socialism. And based on how Canadians just voted, one of these choices will be perceived as better than the other.
It's safe to say that Canadians rejected the unabashed socialism promoted by the New Democratic Party in this election, with the party having lost 18 of its 42 seats. Any effort by Trudeau to shift further left to capture support from the socialists will not only kill Canada's economy but also any support for his policies.
Trudeau's only other avenue to get anything done in this new government is to negotiate with the populist, protectionist, and separatist Bloc Quebecois -- a party that doesn't exist outside of francophone-dominated Quebec but now holds 32 seats, third most behind the Liberals and Conservatives. The Bloc was the big story in this election, having gained 22 seats.
So what does Bloc Quebecois stand for? First and foremost, the protection of French-Canadian heritage and culture. Traditionally, this meant protecting mostly French-speaking Quebec against encroachment by Anglophone Canada. But these days, it more often means a desire for fewer immigrants (and a values test for those who enter the country). The Bloc wants Quebec to be exempt from the federal multiculturalism law that mandates coexistence over common identity. It also wants mandatory knowledge of French as a condition of Canadian citizenship in Quebec, and suspension of the Safe Third Country Agreement with the U.S. -- a loophole that has allowed migrants expelled from America to seek asylum in Canada at unofficial border crossing points.
Any supporter of populism or nationalism in the world can find items they like in the Bloc Quebecois platform. Limited-government conservatives can also find common ground in the Bloc's focus on independence from the federal government.
Granted, there's also a dose of wealth redistribution in the Bloc platform, but collaborating on the Bloc's more left-leaning issues -- as with those of the socialist New Democratic Party platform that Canadian voters soundly rejected -- is a surefire recipe for future electoral defeat for Trudeau's Liberals.
The popular vote shifted right, the left tanked and the populists surged. That's the message Trudeau needs to grasp in order to cobble together a coherent new vision for Canada.
Well at least this should put to rest the left wing narrative, “Every other modern democracy elects their leader through popular vote, we are the only one that uses an archaic system like the electoral college.” In fact almost no country uses a “winner take all” system....
He will publicly say "Populism" things but govern like a Socialist.
Dems have been doing this for decades, saying one thing publicly (to get elected) then doing another once in office.
Not getting things his own way , it’ll drive him nuts and to The Weed ,LOL
I wonder if he has an alter-online-persona, like Carlos Danger or Pierre Delecto.
My feeling is that more stinky stuff involving SNC and other matters regarding his and other Liberals’ nefarious actions will come to light (happy that Jody Wilson-Raybould won her seat Monday night) and that will further damage his and the Liberal brand. Also that working with the NDP is not going to be cheap and that hopefully will have that sort of effect on that many more voters in the 905 GTA area.
People here should remember that even Stephen Harper did not win until 2006 and that was well after Adscam and other Chretien/Martin Liberal scandals came gift wrapped to the voters.
The son of Castro will do whatever his Deep State controllers tell him to do.
Don’t see how. He’s already embraced both.
He’ll have two choices: Liberal Communism or NDP Stalinism. For Turd Dough, that will be like a high-school boy getting to pick which hot supermodel he gets to boink. For the normals, it will be like getting to pick which way to be forcefully sodomized without lube.
Oh you bet and I hate to play the race card. But why are all his most ardent supporters on facebook with names like Hamik, or Mohammed? Africans, Sikh and Muslims seem to love him.
The left loves to embrace “die-versity.” It’s a religion to them. Of course, it usually means sticking it to Whitey (or heteronormal straights). Nevermind that UNITY is what keeps countries and cultures together. “Die-versity” means to divide. Ultimately, it’s about bringing down the existing (White-founded) culture and government so they can implement their sick, dystopian, anti-God vision for the future (whose goal is the elimination of all but 500 million on our planet - so ultimately genocidal, too).
If our worthless mainstream media did their job, they'd be confronting every one of those loudmouth lefties about that and asking why they aren't renouncing Turd-dough's "illegitimate" government.
Just about the ONLY country that DOES elect its head of state thru direct "popular vote" is Mexico, and its a clusterf**k down there whenever they have a close election margin, like in 2012.
The “mainstream media” does its “job.” It is the propaganda arm for the left. That’s all it is and all it will ever be. I learned that a long time ago.
Good point. And I have no allegiance to any sort of race, but am disturbed more about cultural values that are being imported.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.