are muslimes right about women?
Posted on 10/13/2019 5:55:42 PM PDT by robowombat
Germany: Muslim migrant forced girlfriend to live by the Qur’an, beat her savagely when she disobeyed OCT 13, 2019 1:00 PM BY ROBERT SPENCER
We reported at Jihad Watch on a similar case in Germany just days ago, involving another Muslim migrant who brutally beat his wife. Danke, Merkel!
“Men have authority over women because Allah has made the one superior to the other, and because they spend their wealth to maintain them. Good women are obedient. They guard their unseen parts because Allah has guarded them. As for those from whom you fear disobedience, admonish them and send them to beds apart and beat them.” — Qur’an 4:34
Muhammad “struck me on the chest which caused me pain, and then said: Did you think that Allah and His Apostle would deal unjustly with you?” — Aisha (Sahih Muslim 2127)
“Has this pipsqueak whipped his girlfriend (18)?,” translated from “Hat dieser Hänfling seine Freundin (18) ausgepeitscht?,” Bild, October 10, 2019 (thanks to Searchlight Germany):
Wadern – Sadist. Woman-beater. Thug. If the charges are correct, then Mirsad G. (22) is all of those in one person.
The Kosovo-born man with a British passport is said to have mistreated his girlfriends for months. The allegations were revealed in the process at the district court: they include dangerous bodily injury and deprivation of liberty. G. faces up to ten years in prison.
He was with his first girlfriend (16) from April to September 2018. The Muslim is said to have forced her to live strictly in accord with the Koran. Mirsad G. allegedly forbade her contact with her parents, did not let her go to school. He beat her again and again. According to the indictment, he slammed her head against a windowpane – blood flowed. And he is said to have thrown a drinking glass from McDonalds at her face – a laceration.
His next girlfriend (18) suffered even more from him. “The devout accused decided to punish and physically chastise the injured party, with whom he had a relationship from the end of 2018 to the beginning of 2019,” the indictment said. Mirsad G. is said to have beaten the young woman with a squared timber and flogged her with a flat iron cable. And he is said to have injured and branded her in the arms and bottom with a cigarette and a poker from a wood-burning oven. Consequences: Fractures of the rib, zygomatic bone and eye socket.
After the mistreatment, the defendant allegedly locked the 18-year-old in a room. She managed to escape the apartment on February 25. She escaped to a neighbor, who then alerted the police
It never ceases to amaze me how ignorant some western women are when it comes to muslims. If western women were smart, they’d watch “Not without my daughter.”
But...but...but... their culture should be respected. We need to understand that their religion considers women to be less than human and should be treated like property.
If something you own doesn’t work properly then you have every right to smack it a few times to get it to work. Or whip it, strangle it, rape it or kill it and chop it into little pieces.
Diversity, don’tcha know?!
Those head scarves make plenty of sense when you understand they help to hide the bruises.
“ Remember when Billy Jeff and Weaseley had their ‘splendid little war’ with Serbia over these jackwagons?”
I do. And we were promised we’d have our troops home by Christmas 1998.
They’re still there.
Mr. President do Kosovo next. Let Europe handle it from here.
L
Not a problem, Germany and Europe are stronger for diversity............right?
It's no surprise at all.
Women are attracted to men who are allowed to be men. In Europe, it is Muslims who have retained their masculinity while European men have become neutered feminized soyboy crybabies, wearing pink pussy hats and apologizing for everything..
No matter what the feminists say, women are attracted to men who are confident and in control.
Yeah. Flabbergasted at the stupidity.
are muslimes right about women?
Thank Angela Merkel....Germany must be so proud.
For those who don't remember:
During Bill Clinton’s 1999 NATO-led war in Kosovo – which according to some estimates cost as much as $75 billion – we bombed Belgrade for 78 days, killed almost 3,000 civilians, and shredded the civilian infrastructure (including every bridge across the Danube.)
We devastated the environment, bombed the Chinese embassy, came very close to engaging in armed combat against Russian forces, and in general, pursued a horrific and inhumane strategy to rain misery on the civilian population of Belgrade in order to pressure Milosevic into surrendering.
Why did we do all that? The US did not even have an arguable interest in the Balkans, and no one ever tried to claim that Serbia represented any kind of threat to our nation or our interests.
But for months the Clinton administration had told us that Milosevic was waging a vicious genocide against Albanian Muslims, and needed to be stopped. The New York Times called it a “humanitarian war.” In March 1999 – the same month that the bombing started – Clinton’s State Department publicly suggested that as many as 500,000 Albanian Kosovars had been murdered by Milosevic’s regime. In May of that year, as the bombing campaign was drawing to a close, Secretary of Defense William Cohen lowered that estimate 100,000.
Five years after the bombing, after all the forensic investigations had been completed, the prosecutors at Milosevic’s “War Crimes” trial in the Hague were barely been able to document a questionable figure of perhaps 5,000 “bodies and body parts.” During the war, the American people were told that Kosovo was full of mass graves filled with the bodies of murdered Albanian Muslims. But none were ever found.
I wonder if she was one of the welcome refugee girls.
Thanks for posting this embarrassing and disgraceful example of America a.) intervening in a regional civil war we had no business taking part in and then b.) choosing the wrong side.
“ Why did we do all that?“
To wag the dog. That’s why.
L
Stupid should hurt! (Hey, that’s a great tag line)
Make their heads explode.
You got that right! It appears that Clinton's 1999 entry into the war was pretty much based on Hollywood's 1997 movie:
We also bombed Christians on Easter Sunday and stopped during Ramadan. I was furious. It was obvious that the Clinton gang was sympathetic with Muslims. My mom at the time swore that the war was to facilitate heroin coming into the U.S.. I don’t know. She always had a conspiracy theory going. Most of the time she was right.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.