Posted on 10/10/2019 8:42:49 PM PDT by SeekAndFind
Anything worth doing is worth doing right, or so Hunter S. Thompson would say. Clearly Nancy Pelosi is not a fan of the late gonzo journalist. If she were to adopt that simple belief, perhaps the country could move on from the most recent and ridiculous manufactured impeachment crisis. If Nancy Pelosi were interested in doing things the right way, she would hold a vote on the House floor to open an impeachment inquiry. A vote that was held for the Clinton impeachment inquiry, a vote that was held for the Nixon impeachment inquiry, but a vote that Pelosi refuses to hold today.
She cannot hold the vote because it would endanger her more moderate members by having them voice their support for overturning an election on partisan grounds. She cannot hold the vote because she would then be compelled to give both parties, not just her own, subpoena power and access to witnesses. She cannot hold the vote because she cannot afford to allow the American people to see, in open hearings, the spurious claims upon which the impeachment fantasy is based. She cannot make a move without damaging her and her party’s position. Zugzwang would be the term in chess.
Currently we have a non-impeachment, impeachment inquiry because Speaker Pelosi will not take the simple step of holding an impeachment vote on the House floor. This week, the White House correctly asserted that they view any impeachment inquiry, absent a full House vote, as partisan and illegitimate. The White House rightfully believes that, like previous impeachment inquiries, both parties should have the power to subpoena witnesses and the ability to cross-examine them. That the evidence for Congress’s most extraordinary step be in plain view of the American people, not merely relayed from closed door hearings via the mainstream media. A House vote to open the impeachment inquiry would give them that. What is the problem with such a proposition? Only that it would weaken an already shaky Democrat narrative. Pelosi cannot allow an open and fair inquiry to ensue. She cannot allow the American public to see the weakness of her case against the President. If she did, her case for impeachment would fall apart faster than Adam Schiff’s claim to have Russia collusion evidence.
Speaker Pelosi has spent months insisting that she would only move forward with impeachment proceedings if there was broad bipartisan support. Were she to hold a vote now, the myth of a bipartisan process would instantly evaporate. The most recent count in the House has not even universal Democrat support, much less a single Republican vote. The Speaker simply cannot afford to hold a vote or keep with precedent, not if she intends to maintain the veneer of bipartisanship. A one-sided vote to overturn an American election, coming one year before Americans vote in a presidential election, is just not good optics. Nancy Pelosi knows this, and she cannot afford a vote on it.
The Speaker is also painfully aware that the Democrats captured the House in 2018 by winning 31 districts that President Trump won. She cannot rationally believe that compelling those 31 members to overturn their own districts’ choice for President is a good move for a party that wants to hold onto the House. She needs to protect those members from the inevitable public disapproval they would face at home. It is one thing for these members to comply within the confines of an internal whip count, it is another thing entirely to ask them to go on the House floor, and on the record, to support a move repugnant of democracy. She simply cannot hold an impeachment vote and risk almost certainly losing the House next year.
True, the Constitution does not specifically say that the House must vote on impeachment. The Constitution only states that, “the House of Representatives shall have the sole Power of Impeachment.” But what is “the House”? Is it one Congressman, one Chairman of a partisan committee? Adam Schiff and Nancy Pelosi would certainly like to think so. Or is “the House” a majority of the body as has been established by precedent, precedents that garnered bipartisan support. Nancy Pelosi seems to believe it’s the former, the White House, the latter. Fortunately, there exists a third branch of government to resolve such disputes and ambiguities, the judiciary. But naturally, Pelosi cannot allow the matter to go before the courts.
To put this matter before the courts, and ultimately before the Supreme Court, Pelosi would be asking the highest court in the land to ratify a belief that one, or two, highly partisan members of Congress constitutes the “House” for purposes of impeachment. The Court would never accept that rationale. To do so would open every single future President to unbridled impeachment inquiries launched by one or two members of a 435-member body. This is probably why Adam Schiff declared that any attempts to involve the judiciary, the third co-equal branch of government would constitute obstruction. Yes, Adam Schiff believes that involving the judiciary in the administration of justice is obstruction of justice. Pelosi knows she cannot put this matter before the courts, but only the Supreme Court can resolve this ambiguity.
Nancy Pelosi is in an impossible situation. The White House will not allow her to proceed absent a full House vote, and courts are likely to agree. A vote would expose her vulnerable members to the wrath of the electorate. A vote will give equal powers to both parties and open the investigation to public scrutiny which will inevitably sink the current impeachment move. A vote will destroy the carefully crafted and guarded myth of bipartisanship. A vote may not go her way. Nancy Pelosi, leader of the ‘Democrats’ knows that democracy is the last thing she needs right now.
Nancy Pelosi is on the clock. She has to make a move, but she cannot move without damaging her position. Checkmate. Zugzwang.
With how radical the Dems are these days, I would have though she would have gone for it within a day or two of her speech. It really makes me wonder if she even has the votes.
They get more bang for the buck by the steady drumbeat of impeachment claims. The drip drip drip every day to get the polls where they want them.
Trump should taunt the living hell out of Nancy night and day. Just troll her to humiliate her and have her own party turn on her. “Nancy, you said I was guilty. You said you had proof? Or were you lying just to get your base of gullible morons to donate money to the lying corrupt DNC. Here I am Nancy. Impeach me. I dare you to!”
Much like in global thermonuclear war, sometimes the best move is to not play at all.
“They get more bang for the buck by the steady drumbeat of impeachment claims.”
Exactly.
They’re never going to hold an impeachment vote. If they impeach Trump then the next day it goes to the Senate and is thrown out, it’s over, end of story. The goal is to keep Trump locked down by the constant drumbeat of impeachment. Once they impeach him it’s over and they can’t have that.
There have already been two votes. Neither passed. This could be why Nancy is ramrodding the impeachment farce now—she wants it, but does not have the votes.
How many understand the reference to Zugzwang?
Lol I was thinking the same thing. I do, and without Googling, even! It’s the biggest self-esteem boost I got today. :D
The DIMS (and some RINOS) are pathetic buffoons and seditionist losers. They ALL should be tarred & feathered . What malignancies on civil society .
Chess endgames: damned if you do, damned if you don’t.
She ####ED UP SO BADLY!!
If they vote, the swing state Ds will get clobbered for siding with her.
If they dont vote, it looks like a kangaroo court and Trump DOESNT have to let anybody testify and if it went to court the dems would lose.
It’s a DISASTER to feed the rabid base and the whims of the deep state.
We must turn out big but i think 2020 could be a fantasti election year for us
“Nancy Pelosi is in an impossible situation.” True. Trapped. And patriots put her there. She is probably very exhausted living this way : without law and order.
I think this impeachment/Kangaroo Trial BS is going to fizzle out and it won’t even get to the Senate.
When RBG announces her retirement, due to severe health issues, then the impeachment charade will disappear. The media will be 24/7 on Trump’s nominee and why he can’t nominate her.
I learned that from Winning Chess by Chernev & Reinfeld. No matter what move you make, you lose either material or position
Of course that implies that the game Pelosi plays is chesslike in that it is fair and has established rules which both side agree upon.
“How many understand the reference to Zugzwang?”
I do, and it’s not synonymous with checkmate, as Mr. Curry seems to imply at the end of his piece.
You’re right, `Zugswang’ does not mean game over, just that any move weakens a player’s position in the game.
And that’s where Pelosi finds herself. I wonder if she’s started doing like Feinstein is known to do; march up to a wavering Democrat and poke them in the chest and growl, “vote my way or I will hurt you”?
I liken them to people in a sinking raft in the middle of the ocean surrounded by man-eating sharks, who decide to cut off their arms and legs to throw to the sharks to keep from getting eaten alive.
They will rue the day they ever tried to run this impeachment scam on Donald Trump.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.