TEll Nancy to let the voters decide in 13 months... and not the Democratic Party in the Congress.
“...not an impeachable offense”
It’s not an offense of any kind. It’s a guy doing his job effectively. Though likely that is some kind of offense to Leftist whack jobs.
Graham said. “And I want Nancy Pelosi to know that Republican senators are not going to impeach this president ...”
“He would know”
Well Graham should know that the Senate does not impeach a President. :-)
Compromised by her own party. Remember, more than one person has known for a very long time who the whistle blower is...and I have absolutely no doubt that Schiff has known who the WB is......before we even heard of a WB.
BUT THEY ARE PROTECTING THE CONSTITUTION AND NATIONAL SECURITY AND BLAH, BLAH, BLAH, LINDSEY!
Isn’t that up to the MSM?
I’m confused. Just who is in charge of this msm/dem/edu/fbi/cia RESIST coalition aka the Marxists.
Hillary, Obama, Soros?
Since Juan McLame kicked the bucket and quit controlling him, I've grown to like Linda Graham.
I bet he did not consult with Mitt Romney.
Great! People here hate Graham, but he’s a smart man and very aggressive in his genteel SC way. People in SC like him so that’s good.
He didn’t like Trump at the start. But neither did a lot of people because Trump was so different. I actually didn’t trust him because I thought it was all a pose to get elected. I should have known better...I’m from NY and was living there when Trump had his ugly divorces, rebuilt the Wollman Rink with his own money, was one of the leading forces behind the Hudson Yards (opposed by Nadler), etc. So Trump is what he is and what he says he is, and I finally believed this and I think Graham does too. And what Trump is ...is somebody who loves America.
That doesn’t mean people can’t disagree with Trump on particular issues, and that’s perfectly legit. Frankly, I think it’s Dem trolls here (and there are many) who attack Graham every time his name appears because they want to kick the legs out from anybody who supports Trump on any issue.
It’s not about him actually being removed for his activity.
It’s about trashing him to the extent confused voters remove him.
It’s very revealing how many people state that Trump has ignored the Constitution and has committed and is still committing countless crimes.
None of that is true.
“They’re about to destroy the nation for no good reason,”
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Unlike when Graham tried to destroy the nation with amnesty THREE times.........
Thank you, Captain Obvious. Pelosi isn't stupid enough to think there are 67 votes to convict in the Senate, nobody is.
I am suspecting Pelosi is allowing all of this to proceed, hoping it will mean the Dems lose the House in 2020. That would also help the Dem leadership ‘sit’ on the new class Leftists/socialists.
Pelosi has probably concluded that, if the Dems retain the House, she is out as speaker anyway. Thus, she has no indigestion with the Pubbies retaking the House.
Great move by Graham. He has made it public that nothing will come of this. If they continue it appears to the voters as just a waste of time because it’s not going any further.
They need to publish a “round robin” letter with 34 signatures stating that they will vote “not guilty” regardless of any evidence presented. Governor Huey Long’s supporters in the Louisiana Senate did this when he was impeached in 1929 and it shut down the impeachment immediately.
I think Nancy Pelosi got played by Adam Schiff. First, he engineered this “whistleblower” account of President Trump’s phone call with the President of the Ukraine. Once that was in place, I think he told Pelosi that the details of the conversation would be “devastating” if they were ever made public. Pelosi, taking Schiff at his word, jumped the gun and immediately announced the impeachment inquiry. She thought President Trump would resist all efforts to release the transcript of the call, allowing the Democrats to claim there was a cover-up. She figured he would eventually be forced to release the “devastating” transcript, at which point they would have all of the evidence they needed for impeachment. As usual, President Trump out maneuvered them by releasing the transcript immediately. Once she saw the actual transcript, she knew she had been had, and the Democrats had nothing. I suspect she’s now looking for a way out of this “impeachment inquiry” without looking like a total fool.
They’re not going to stop. They don’t believe we hve the right to choose our own leaders. They get to do that.
Just my opinion, but Graham is stumping for 2024....
Why haven’t democrats listed the actual crime. Then backed up there claim by citing a section of the law that was broken.
Why? Because there is no crime. Therefore per the constitution then there can be no impeachment.