Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

The D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals also ordered the FCC to revise the repeal order to take into consideration other issues, like the effect that it will have on public safety.

It looks like "public safety" will be used as the next drive for Obama era 'net neutrality' regulations.

The article also hides who brought the lawsuit but I believe these people may be involved:

Battle for the Net

1 posted on 10/01/2019 8:04:15 AM PDT by yesthatjallen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: yesthatjallen

How can a state regulate the internet????


2 posted on 10/01/2019 8:07:24 AM PDT by Gay State Conservative (A joke: Brennan,Comey and Lynch walk into a Barr...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: yesthatjallen

IF the states can make their OWN internet laws, then it’s a utility.................


3 posted on 10/01/2019 8:09:22 AM PDT by Red Badger (Against stupidity the gods themselves contend in vain...................)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: yesthatjallen

Cool. So suddenly the left respects states rights? Great....traditional marriage can be protected!


12 posted on 10/01/2019 8:33:03 AM PDT by SoFloFreeper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: yesthatjallen

Sounds like a recipe for disaster. Is that the goal here?


13 posted on 10/01/2019 8:44:46 AM PDT by Ron H. (Gab.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: yesthatjallen

A patchwork of state laws will not improve safety, privacy and speed of the Internet. The regulation should be at the federal level and only after the agency consults knowledgable IT specialists in industry and providers as to needs and will the proposed regulation be effective. State legislators and most congresscritters know as much about Internet protocols and engineering IT codes as a 3 month-old human baby.


14 posted on 10/01/2019 8:50:38 AM PDT by RicocheT (Don't argue with an idiot; people watching may not be able to tell the difference.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: yesthatjallen

Husseins gig on Netflix is a big THANK YOU for allowing the streaming service to hog something like 70% of the country’s bandwidth for practically FREE allowing them to grow into the giant company they are today.
Thank you barrack!!!


15 posted on 10/01/2019 9:07:37 AM PDT by mowowie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: yesthatjallen

The Internet is, by its very nature, interstate commerce. How can this group of judges think that such a thing can be capable of being broken up into state-by-state regulatory fiefdoms? It really is not possible. Do they really think it possible for Illinois and New York to have different bandwidth regulations than Kansas and Oklahoma for various customers of a nationwide ISP? How about if those customers are connecting to that ISP through a mobile device in another state, or using a VPN located in another state than where they reside? Please tell me how they are going to regulate that? How about if the customer has his business located in one state but his cloud storage in another, while his processing is done in yet a third state? Entirely possible in this day of remote connections.


16 posted on 10/01/2019 2:28:13 PM PDT by Swordmaker (My pistol self-identifies as an iPad, so you must accept it in gun-free zones, you hoplaphobe bigot!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: yesthatjallen
Obamacare for the Internet NYS update...

NY lawmakers craft net neutrality bill

Guess folks ain't fleeing the state fast enough for Albany...

17 posted on 10/04/2019 4:10:09 AM PDT by mewzilla (Break out the mustard seeds.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson