Now do all the Hillary witnesses who died.
Wouldn’t it be funny if the whistleblower turned out to be Schiff himself, or Nadler?
They’ve been making things up for more than 2 years to get Trump, so, I wouldn’t put this ‘new’ hoax above them.
The whistleblower’s id can’t be known before he is brought before congress... very convenient!
A complaint about Trump from ONE person backed by ANTI-TRUMP GEORGE SOROS/HILLARY and a TEAM OF COMPLAINT-WRITING LAWYERS hellbent on UNDOING the results of the 2016 election but yet the complainant is entitled to being kept ANONYMOUS?
EFF THAT!
George Soros' house should be RAIDED by the 'patriot wing' of the FBI if such a wing exists which at this point I have my doubts.
What is required to investigate the recent change in the whistle-blower law allowing hearsay evidence?? If the law was not lawfully changed and reverts back to the original wordage and intent, then this one loses his protection.
How did the change come about?? - and by whom??
The proglibs sink further into their collective delusion...
.
What a brilliant idea, have someone testify about alleged incidents that they never actually witnessed in person, but heard 2nd or 3 hand. That would really go over big in a court of law.
Has Nunes referred him to the DOJ for LYING to CONgress yet?? WHy doesn’t Linda do it? Does it matter if the Senate Refers LIARS to The House to the DOJ for Criminal Prosecution?
Will a Blasey type be presented as the leaker?
This becomes more clownish every day.
An anonymous “witness” testifying in secret to second or third-hand information from other secret witnesses, who might have gotten their information second or third-hand. And testifying to a Chairman who is known to make up stuff.
What sort of &&#$ is this? C’mon. Charlie Chaplin had talent, at least.
NOT at all going to be a very good witness if we can look for shifty eyes, and moistened eyes when moved. This will be the JOKE of the century, a hooded KKK Klansman on the HIll impeaching a sitting President.
Are they going to put blindfolds on Congress?
We are living in the twilight zone.
How can he testify when he has no personal knowledge of anything?
Why are we allowing a CIA Deep State perpetual-war-seeking a-hole to take out our President?
Schitt is lying as usual
“Whistleblower” is now under fed protection because scared for life. Same crap they pull everytime to ensure nobody can gain access.
Next, they’ll have some hack collaborate the 2nd hand hearsay.
Same BS they did with Blasey-Ford.
We’re not allowed to know. this b=country is fast going down the tubs,
They will find a dead body and claim Trump ordered a hit.
How are these hearings even legit? Just because Nancy names them an Impeachment Inquiry?
How are these any different than the past Nader hearings?
I would just ignore the subpoenas. Let them flop in the wind.
The ‘RATS are perfecting their game. They learned from the Christine Blasey Ford testimony. Blasey-Ford 1.0 was readily proven that her allegations were supported by NONE of her witnesses and that she told many falsehoods.
Blasey-Ford 2.0 (the “John Doe” CIA so called Whistleblower) will have his/her identity hidden and his/her 2nd & 3rd hand “sources” will apparently not be identified either. So Blasey-Ford 2.0’s testimony cannot be proven false like Blasey-Ford 1.0’s was when her supposed “witnesses” would not commit perjury to support 1.0’s fairy tail.
they have probably devised a way to prevent the Republicans from being present at the hearing...
First they have to find some idiot to play the Whistler-blower,I don’t think there is one