Skip to comments.
Media Hyped ‘Wrong’ Study Linking Trump Rallies To Hate Crimes, Then Ignored Second Study Debunking
Daily Caller ^
| September 11, 2019
| PETER HASSON
Posted on 09/11/2019 7:18:18 PM PDT by lowbridge
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21 next last
Full title: Media Hyped Wrong Study Linking Trump Rallies To Hate Crimes, Then Ignored Second Study Debunking It
1
posted on
09/11/2019 7:18:18 PM PDT
by
lowbridge
To: lowbridge
The socialist RAT organization is a hate crime and anti-Semite factory.
2
posted on
09/11/2019 7:22:41 PM PDT
by
FlingWingFlyer
(You can vote your way into socialism but you have to shoot your way out of it.)
To: lowbridge
Why would they run the second study? We all know that these criminals are not interested in the truth; just their version of the truth.
3
posted on
09/11/2019 7:23:18 PM PDT
by
NohSpinZone
(First thing we do, let's kill all the lawyers)
To: lowbridge; Elsie
The study is wrong, and yet journalists ran with it anyway,
“Establishment media outlets spread the first studys conclusions but have largely ignored the second.”
More critics teaching their desired answer by ignoring the facts.
4
posted on
09/11/2019 7:24:00 PM PDT
by
fproy2222
(MAGA; The United States of American is still the best place to live and it can become better.)
To: lowbridge
The hate crimes were against Trump supporters. In the media’s eyes, you are instigating an attack simply by attending a Trump rally.
5
posted on
09/11/2019 7:28:36 PM PDT
by
Blood of Tyrants
(Everyone who favors socialism plans on the government taking other people's money, not theirs.)
To: lowbridge
That’s what the Ministry of Propaganda does.
Propaganda.
6
posted on
09/11/2019 7:29:17 PM PDT
by
Lurkinanloomin
(Natural Born Citizen Means Born Here Of Citizen Parents_Know Islam, No Peace-No Islam, Know Peace)
To: Lurkinanloomin
BS absolutely, but not to worry. Media has destroyed their creditability such that 2/3rds of the country considers anything they report as biased speculation. Maybe true....maybe not. Full details emerge in a day or two.
Look at MSLSD, CNN, and the big nets. Ratings down. Embarrassed almost daily. They are a joke and most of America knows it.
7
posted on
09/11/2019 7:41:42 PM PDT
by
chiller
(As Davey Crockett once said: Be sure you're right. Then go ahead. I'm goin' ahead.)
To: lowbridge
They told big lies and got caught. Why does that surprise anyone?
If you are on the left you live on lies and are damn proud of it.
Whatever happened to the Russian propaganda BS and the predictions, big bald faced lies, of Trump being indicted/arrested/convicted/sent to prison?
Every lefty I know told those lies every day for two years and now refuse to even acknowledge their dishonesty.
That is what the left has taught us, they lie all the time and are very proud of it.
To: lowbridge
Well...
Trump rallies automatically trigger hate crimes.
Mentioning the name Trump will get people to hate you.
Wearing a MAGA hat is a hate crime and brings out the worst in people.
Cheering for Trump means you’re a hater and makes you a racist and a homophobe and misogynist and an Islamaphobe.
That must be what the Texas study was all about.
9
posted on
09/11/2019 8:06:41 PM PDT
by
adorno
To: lowbridge
It’s hard to find a hate crime that is not a hoax unless it’s liberal committing it.
10
posted on
09/11/2019 9:48:58 PM PDT
by
\/\/ayne
(I regret that I have but one subscription cancellation notice to give to my local newspaper.)
To: lowbridge
Ummm, liberals are liars... it’s a different type of violence used against conservatives. So I’m not surprised the ‘research’ was ‘flawed’...
11
posted on
09/11/2019 10:04:27 PM PDT
by
GOPJ
(I saw a movie about governments and weaponless people - - Schindler's List...freeper Chickensoup)
To: lowbridge; All
TIME TO BRING THIS UP
During the period after the civil war known as reconstruction black legislators who were Republican were elected in the south To stop this democrats came up with segregation poll taxes and Jim Crow laws and the KKK
12
posted on
09/11/2019 10:27:00 PM PDT
by
mosesdapoet
(mosesdapoet aka L,J,Keslin posting for the record hoping some might read and pass around)
To: mosesdapoet
13
posted on
09/11/2019 10:30:23 PM PDT
by
sport
To: lowbridge
I don’t know how they proved the first study ‘wrong’. I read the first study and it was unintelligible gibberish.
14
posted on
09/11/2019 10:46:32 PM PDT
by
Chaguito
To: AdmSmith; AnonymousConservative; Arthur Wildfire! March; Berosus; Bockscar; cardinal4; ColdOne; ...
15
posted on
09/11/2019 11:53:10 PM PDT
by
SunkenCiv
(Imagine an imaginary menagerie manager imagining managing an imaginary menagerie.)
To: lowbridge
The truth that is being masked by this entire back and forth is that to confirm model validity often requires many hours (and days) of testing and retesting. The idea that transforming a single variable invalidates a whole series of analyses and models produced by Ph.D. holding researchers lacks face validity, Ayal Feinberg, one of the Texas researchers, told the DCNF in an email. Feinberg is squealing like a stuck pig! What a bunch of used food.
Feinberg said that there are several methodological questions that [Lilley and Wheaton] have not answered and claims where we fundamentally disagree.
Name them publically then, weasel. I think you [Feinberg] are lying.
16
posted on
09/12/2019 2:40:36 AM PDT
by
sauropod
(I am His and He is Mine)
To: fproy2222
More critics teaching their desired answer by ignoring the facts.I'm glad you've noticed this tactic.
17
posted on
09/12/2019 6:08:36 AM PDT
by
Elsie
(Heck is where people, who don't believe in Gosh, think they are not going...)
To: lowbridge
18
posted on
09/12/2019 8:20:36 AM PDT
by
Albion Wilde
(It is fatal to enter any war without the will to win it. --Douglas MacArthur)
To: SunkenCiv
19
posted on
09/12/2019 9:13:57 AM PDT
by
GOPJ
(I saw a movie about governments and weaponless people - - Schindler's List...freeper Chickensoup)
To: lowbridge
The truth that is being masked by this entire back and forth is that to confirm model validity often requires many hours (and days) of testing and retesting. The idea that transforming a single variable invalidates a whole series of analyses and models produced by Ph.D. holding researchers lacks face validity, Ayal Feinberg, one of the Texas researchers, told the DCNF in an email.
Or it shows the study was not only wrong, but never rigorous to begin with. Perhaps merely laughable.
20
posted on
09/12/2019 4:59:03 PM PDT
by
lepton
("It is useless to attempt to reason a man out of a thing he was never reasoned into"--Jonathan Swift)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson