Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Media Hyped ‘Wrong’ Study Linking Trump Rallies To Hate Crimes, Then Ignored Second Study Debunking
Daily Caller ^ | September 11, 2019 | PETER HASSON

Posted on 09/11/2019 7:18:18 PM PDT by lowbridge

Establishment media outlets like The Washington Post hyped a now-disputed study that linked President Donald Trump’s campaign rallies to a spike in hate crimes, but they’ve yet to cover a second study that debunked the first one.

The first study, which three Texas university professors conducted, said counties that hosted Trump rallies in 2016 saw a 226% spike in hate crimes compared to places that didn’t host Trump rallies. Harvard University researchers found the political scientists had gotten it wrong when they tried to replicate the study.

“The study is wrong, and yet journalists ran with it anyway,” Harvard researchers Matthew Lilley and Brian Wheaton wrote on Sept. 6 in Reason, a libertarian magazine.

Establishment media outlets spread the first study’s conclusions but have largely ignored the second.

The Texas researchers published their findings in March in the Post in an analysistitled, “Counties that hosted a 2016 Trump rally saw a 226 percent increase in hate crimes.” The Post cited the study in several articles published since then.

Other media outlets echoed the analysis.

(Excerpt) Read more at dailycaller.com ...


TOPICS: Culture/Society; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections; US: District of Columbia; US: Massachusetts; US: Texas
KEYWORDS: 2020election; bias; brianwheaton; districtofcolumbia; dnctalkingpoint; dnctalkingpoints; domesticenemies; election2020; enemiesofthepeople; fakenews; harvard; jeffbezos; massachusetts; matthewlilley; mediabias; mediawingofthednc; msm; partisanmediashills; presstitutes; reason; smearmachine; texas; trump; washingtoncompost; washingtonpost
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021 next last
Full title: Media Hyped ‘Wrong’ Study Linking Trump Rallies To Hate Crimes, Then Ignored Second Study Debunking It
1 posted on 09/11/2019 7:18:18 PM PDT by lowbridge
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: lowbridge

The socialist RAT organization is a hate crime and anti-Semite factory.


2 posted on 09/11/2019 7:22:41 PM PDT by FlingWingFlyer (You can vote your way into socialism but you have to shoot your way out of it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: lowbridge

Why would they run the second study? We all know that these criminals are not interested in the truth; just their version of the truth.


3 posted on 09/11/2019 7:23:18 PM PDT by NohSpinZone (First thing we do, let's kill all the lawyers)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: lowbridge; Elsie

“The study is wrong, and yet journalists ran with it anyway,”
“Establishment media outlets spread the first study’s conclusions but have largely ignored the second.”

More critics teaching their desired answer by ignoring the facts.


4 posted on 09/11/2019 7:24:00 PM PDT by fproy2222 (MAGA; The United States of American is still the best place to live and it can become better.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: lowbridge

The hate crimes were against Trump supporters. In the media’s eyes, you are instigating an attack simply by attending a Trump rally.


5 posted on 09/11/2019 7:28:36 PM PDT by Blood of Tyrants (Everyone who favors socialism plans on the government taking other people's money, not theirs.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: lowbridge

That’s what the Ministry of Propaganda does.

Propaganda.


6 posted on 09/11/2019 7:29:17 PM PDT by Lurkinanloomin (Natural Born Citizen Means Born Here Of Citizen Parents_Know Islam, No Peace-No Islam, Know Peace)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lurkinanloomin
BS absolutely, but not to worry. Media has destroyed their creditability such that 2/3rds of the country considers anything they report as biased speculation. Maybe true....maybe not. Full details emerge in a day or two.

Look at MSLSD, CNN, and the big nets. Ratings down. Embarrassed almost daily. They are a joke and most of America knows it.

7 posted on 09/11/2019 7:41:42 PM PDT by chiller (As Davey Crockett once said: Be sure you're right. Then go ahead. I'm goin' ahead.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: lowbridge

They told big lies and got caught. Why does that surprise anyone?

If you are on the left you live on lies and are damn proud of it.

Whatever happened to the Russian propaganda BS and the predictions, big bald faced lies, of Trump being indicted/arrested/convicted/sent to prison?

Every lefty I know told those lies every day for two years and now refuse to even acknowledge their dishonesty.

That is what the left has taught us, they lie all the time and are very proud of it.


8 posted on 09/11/2019 7:44:30 PM PDT by oldenuff35
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: lowbridge

Well...

Trump rallies automatically trigger hate crimes.

Mentioning the name Trump will get people to hate you.

Wearing a MAGA hat is a hate crime and brings out the worst in people.

Cheering for Trump means you’re a hater and makes you a racist and a homophobe and misogynist and an Islamaphobe.

That must be what the Texas study was all about.


9 posted on 09/11/2019 8:06:41 PM PDT by adorno
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: lowbridge

It’s hard to find a hate crime that is not a hoax unless it’s liberal committing it.


10 posted on 09/11/2019 9:48:58 PM PDT by \/\/ayne (I regret that I have but one subscription cancellation notice to give to my local newspaper.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: lowbridge

Ummm, liberals are liars... it’s a different type of violence used against conservatives. So I’m not surprised the ‘research’ was ‘flawed’...


11 posted on 09/11/2019 10:04:27 PM PDT by GOPJ (I saw a movie about governments and weaponless people - - Schindler's List...freeper Chickensoup)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: lowbridge; All

TIME TO BRING THIS UP
During the period after the civil war known as reconstruction black legislators who were Republican were elected in the south To stop this democrats came up with segregation poll taxes and Jim Crow laws and the KKK


12 posted on 09/11/2019 10:27:00 PM PDT by mosesdapoet (mosesdapoet aka L,J,Keslin posting for the record hoping some might read and pass around)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mosesdapoet

And murdering them.


13 posted on 09/11/2019 10:30:23 PM PDT by sport
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: lowbridge

I don’t know how they proved the first study ‘wrong’. I read the first study and it was unintelligible gibberish.


14 posted on 09/11/2019 10:46:32 PM PDT by Chaguito
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AdmSmith; AnonymousConservative; Arthur Wildfire! March; Berosus; Bockscar; cardinal4; ColdOne; ...
Thanks lowbridge.

15 posted on 09/11/2019 11:53:10 PM PDT by SunkenCiv (Imagine an imaginary menagerie manager imagining managing an imaginary menagerie.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: lowbridge
“The truth that is being masked by this entire back and forth is that to confirm model validity often requires many hours (and days) of testing and retesting. The idea that transforming a single variable invalidates a whole series of analyses and models produced by Ph.D. holding researchers lacks face validity,” Ayal Feinberg, one of the Texas researchers, told the DCNF in an email.

Feinberg is squealing like a stuck pig! What a bunch of used food.

Feinberg said that “there are several methodological questions that [Lilley and Wheaton] have not answered and claims where we fundamentally disagree.”

Name them publically then, weasel. I think you [Feinberg] are lying.

16 posted on 09/12/2019 2:40:36 AM PDT by sauropod (I am His and He is Mine)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: fproy2222
More critics teaching their desired answer by ignoring the facts.

I'm glad you've noticed this tactic.

17 posted on 09/12/2019 6:08:36 AM PDT by Elsie (Heck is where people, who don't believe in Gosh, think they are not going...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: lowbridge

bump


18 posted on 09/12/2019 8:20:36 AM PDT by Albion Wilde (It is fatal to enter any war without the will to win it. --Douglas MacArthur)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SunkenCiv

Thanks civ...


19 posted on 09/12/2019 9:13:57 AM PDT by GOPJ (I saw a movie about governments and weaponless people - - Schindler's List...freeper Chickensoup)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: lowbridge

“The truth that is being masked by this entire back and forth is that to confirm model validity often requires many hours (and days) of testing and retesting. The idea that transforming a single variable invalidates a whole series of analyses and models produced by Ph.D. holding researchers lacks face validity,” Ayal Feinberg, one of the Texas researchers, told the DCNF in an email.


Or it shows the study was not only wrong, but never rigorous to begin with. Perhaps merely laughable.


20 posted on 09/12/2019 4:59:03 PM PDT by lepton ("It is useless to attempt to reason a man out of a thing he was never reasoned into"--Jonathan Swift)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson