Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Meatspace

It would be a territory. It’s too tiny, population-wise.


31 posted on 08/22/2019 9:31:19 PM PDT by fieldmarshaldj (Who will think of the gerbils ? Just say no to Buttgiggity !)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]


To: fieldmarshaldj
It would be a territory. It’s too tiny, population-wise.

Until global warming melts Greenland's inner sea and Barron Trump's grandson starts building properties... :0)


35 posted on 08/23/2019 5:27:06 AM PDT by COBOL2Java (AOC: The brain of a tea bisquit)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies ]

To: fieldmarshaldj

“It would be a territory. It’s too tiny, population-wise.”

There are no standards the population needed to become a state.

Greenland’s population is 56,670 while the population of Wyoming is 577,737. Thus the population of Wyoming is roughly ten times that of Greenland.

Meanwhile, the population of California is 39,557,045 or roughly 68 times the size of Wyoming.

However, despite its small population, Wyoming is still a state.

Statehood for Greenland by 2021


39 posted on 08/23/2019 7:41:48 AM PDT by Meatspace
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies ]

To: fieldmarshaldj

The plan is to make Greenland the 51st State. That is why the NRCC is printing tee-shirts that shows Greenland to be a state.

Why would the NRCC print tee shirts that show Greenland as a state, if the plan was not to make Greenland the 51st state?

41 posted on 08/23/2019 1:25:25 PM PDT by Meatspace
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson