Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Federal Judge Rules Against Maryland To Uncover Obvious Vote Fraud Potential
americanthinker ^ | August 16, 2019 | Thomas Lifson

Posted on 08/18/2019 11:27:03 AM PDT by MarvinStinson

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-39 last
To: MarvinStinson
Calif. Begins Removing 5 Million Inactive Voters on Its Rolls

Los Angeles County has started the process of removing from its registration rolls an estimated 1.5 million inactive voters who have moved, died or become ineligible to cast a ballot, an effort to comply with federal election law and a court settlement with Judicial Watch...

It’s the first time in 20 years that Los Angeles County has cleaned its voter rolls...

California’s top election official has put all 58 of its counties on notice that they must also purge inactive voters from their rosters...

There were an estimated 5 million inactive registrations in the state as of November 2016...

The Los Angeles Times found that the new motor-voter system was plagued by glitches responsible for more than 100,000 inaccurate voter-registration records in Los Angeles County, including... at least 1,500 noncitizens wrongly allowed to register to vote...

The system also suffered from a serious cyberattack during the middle of its botched 2018 rollout by what appeared to be hackers in Croatia. California Secretary of State Padilla’s office did not disclose the hack until media reports exposed it earlier this year...

21 posted on 08/18/2019 1:22:10 PM PDT by concentric circles
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: qaz123

Developer croonies is exactly the problem in Montgomery county. they built a 4 lane toll highway from Baltimore to 270 nobody uses! its empty. but the builders got paid .


22 posted on 08/18/2019 1:25:24 PM PDT by Ikeon (I used to be nice, didn't like being walked all over by 10% of the population.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Howie66

Yep


23 posted on 08/18/2019 1:29:39 PM PDT by Bigg Red (WWG1WGA)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: concentric circles

That will stop a lot of vote harvesting.

You can be assured all of those “voted” for Hillary in 2016.

Vote fraud search:

https://www.freerepublic.com/tag/votefraud/index?tab=articles


24 posted on 08/18/2019 2:15:37 PM PDT by Syncro (Facts is Facts)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: MarvinStinson

I did not realize it until I saw a chart from Judicial watch. But California lead the pack by far with 1.7 million more registered voters than eligible voting adults.


25 posted on 08/18/2019 3:49:51 PM PDT by Revel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Revel
More-voters-than-adult-citizens
26 posted on 08/18/2019 5:27:34 PM PDT by AzNASCARfan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: All
"Judicial Watch announced that a federal court has ordered the State of Maryland to produce voter list data for Montgomery County, the state's biggest county."

What good is THAT going to do? All whoever does the list has to do is put only the same amount of names as there are residents, maybe even a couple less, to make it look good.

27 posted on 08/18/2019 5:40:28 PM PDT by jackibutterfly (A vote for ANY Democrat, whether it be in a local, st or fed election, is a vote against America.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AzNASCARfan
From the chart:

"3,551,760: number of suspicious/fraudulent registered voters in 2016 presidential election"

How many "popular" votes did hilliary win by again? Hmmmmm.

28 posted on 08/18/2019 5:44:49 PM PDT by jackibutterfly (A vote for ANY Democrat, whether it be in a local, st or fed election, is a vote against America.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: AzNASCARfan

Thanks for posting that. It leaves little question in my mind how they took out so many republicans running for congress last time around.

The current story about California turning blue is also very likely a cover story so that people don’t question the fraudulent results that occur in the next election. Propaganda is carefully planned by the left.


29 posted on 08/18/2019 7:35:59 PM PDT by Revel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: Ikeon

Always do. In the small town I live in, they’re putting up a mall, movie theater, shops(somewhat high end, they say), an apartment complex otherwise Publix wouldn’t build. I guess the powers that be and their developer buddies didn’t ask the next county over what they were going to put in their mall, w/ its shops and Publix, etc. So, the consumer pool just got cut in half, at least. Quite a few For Rent signs in the town square and most of the businesses that move in don’t last very long.

But, the local politicians will make their money and the developer will make theirs and the taxpayer gets screwed


30 posted on 08/18/2019 9:47:25 PM PDT by qaz123
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: MarvinStinson

Judge Hollander? Is she related to the late Sidney Hollander etc? He was a big lib Democrat with some ties to Communist Party fronts in the middle of the last century (See SPCUA Hearings 1938 etc).

There was a Sidney Hollander Jr who was more Left than his father so we have to be careful about the timing as to what fronts they joined or supported.

I hope Judge Hollander is a good judge and reviews cases based on the issues of law and constitutionality. That would be a great change for Maryland whose Court of Appeals judges are some of the most Leftist in the country.


31 posted on 08/18/2019 11:29:14 PM PDT by MadMax, the Grinning Reaper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MadMax, the Grinning Reaper

MARYLAND IMPLIES JUDICIAL WATCH HAS TIES TO RUSSIAN AGENTS IN SHAMEFUL EFFORT TO HIDE VOTER ROLLS MESS

https://www.judicialwatch.org/corruption-chronicles/maryland-implies-judicial-watch-has-ties-to-russian-agents-in-shameful-effort-to-hide-voter-rolls-mess/

Maryland officials have resorted to desperate measures to avoid giving Judicial Watch voter registration records—as required by federal law—by suggesting Judicial Watch is connected to Russian government agents. The absurd implication was made in a federal court document involving a lawsuit filed last summer as part of a national Election Integrity Project to clean up voter rolls. Maryland is one of 11 states with more registered voters than citizens of voting age, according to U.S. Census Bureau data examined as part of Judicial Watch’s ongoing investigation.

In notice-of-violation letters Judicial Watch warned it would sue the 11 states if the problems weren’t fixed. In Maryland’s case, there are more registered voters in Montgomery County, the state’s most populous, than citizens over the age of 18. Besides threatening legal action, Judicial watch’s notice letter to election officials requested access to Montgomery County voter registration lists to evaluate efforts to ensure the accuracy of eligible voter rolls during the past two years. Section 8(i) of the National Voter Registration Act of 1993 (NVRA) authorizes and entitles Judicial Watch to inspect and copy the requested voter lists. Maryland officials refuse to provide them, claiming that state law restricts the release of voter registration information to Maryland registered voters. The NVRA trumps any reservation the state may have and Judicial Watch is confident it will obtain the records.

Nevertheless, Judicial Watch had to sue in U.S. District Court for the District of Maryland to gain access to the voter registration lists under federal law, noting that Section 8(i) of the NVRA contains no requirement that only an individual person or a registered voter may request the documents that the statute describes. Accordingly, Section 8(i) authorizes and entitles Judicial Watch to inspect and copy the requested voter lists. Maryland officials have chosen to dodge the law, refusing to provide the records and stonewalling with outlandish assertions during the pretrial discovery process. In a federal court document filed on behalf of State Administrator of Elections Linda H. Lamone, Maryland Attorney General Brian E. Frosh tries to associate Judicial Watch with Russian government agents.

Here is the excerpt straight from the interrogatory filed in court by Maryland’s attorney general:

“Identify any Russian nationals or agents of the Russian government with whom you have communicated concerning this lawsuit, Judicial Watch’s request for a copy of the list of registered voters in Montgomery County, Maryland, the purposes for which you are seeking a copy of the list of registered voters in Montgomery County, Maryland, and/or any broader effort to obtain copies of similar lists from other jurisdictions of which Judicial Watch’s request for a copy of the list of registered voters in Montgomery County, Maryland, is a part.”

This shows that Maryland officials are using a baseless allegation to retaliate against an organization and its supporters because of their conservative political views, a violation of the First Amendment.

This week Judicial Watch responded to the plainly frivolous request as part of the pretrial process.

There is not a shred of evidence or allegation in any pleading, document or even news report of any communications or associations between Judicial Watch and Russian nationals or agents of the Russian government. Maryland officials knew that when they made the egregious request for documents they believed did not exist solely to associate Judicial Watch with an inflammatory, partisan fight making national headlines. This reflects negatively on Lamone and the Maryland State Board of Elections and both should be ashamed.

“It’s completely outrageous,” said Robert Popper, director of Judicial Watch’s Election Integrity Project and a former deputy chief of the Voting Section of the Civil Rights Division at the Justice Department. “A government agency is taking Democratic talking points to beat someone up for suing them.”

Other states that Judicial Watch is forcing to clean up voter rolls include Alabama, California, Florida, Georgia, Illinois, Iowa, Kentucky, New Jersey, New York, North Carolina and Tennessee. In California, Judicial Watch found more registered voters than voting-age citizens in 11 counties, including Imperial (102%), Lassen (102%), Los Angeles (112%), Monterey (104%), San Diego (138%), San Francisco (114%), San Mateo (111%), Santa Cruz (109%), Solano (111%), Stanislaus (102%), and Yolo (110%). Under Section 8 of the NVRA, states are required to make a reasonable effort to remove the names of ineligible voters from official lists due to “the death of the registrant” or “a change in the residence of the registrant,” and requires states to ensure noncitizens are not registered to vote.

Many states don’t bother conducting reasonable voter registration list maintenance as mandated under the NVRA.


32 posted on 08/19/2019 12:34:29 AM PDT by MarvinStinson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: Revel

There are more registered voters in Montgomery County, the state’s most populous, than citizens over the age of 18.


33 posted on 08/19/2019 12:35:32 AM PDT by MarvinStinson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: qaz123
Maryland Attorney General Brian E. Frosh tries to associate Judicial Watch with Russian government agents.

Here is the excerpt straight from the interrogatory filed in court by Maryland’s attorney general:

“Identify any Russian nationals or agents of the Russian government with whom you have communicated concerning this lawsuit, Judicial Watch’s request for a copy of the list of registered voters in Montgomery County, Maryland, the purposes for which you are seeking a copy of the list of registered voters in Montgomery County, Maryland, and/or any broader effort to obtain copies of similar lists from other jurisdictions of which Judicial Watch’s request for a copy of the list of registered voters in Montgomery County, Maryland, is a part.”

34 posted on 08/19/2019 12:39:26 AM PDT by MarvinStinson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: MarvinStinson

When all else fails and you can’t blame everything on an “ism”, “ist”, you are not allowed to blame the “Russians”.


35 posted on 08/19/2019 1:03:13 AM PDT by qaz123
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: MarvinStinson

Frosh is a hardcore Marxist of the Soros-type. He joins with DC’s DA Racine and PG County’s DA (sometimes as I recall) to block every government effort re illegal immigration, esp. the notification of the release of criminal aliens from jail.

I consider him one of the worst State’s DA’s in the US behind NY, Washington State, California and esp. NY.


36 posted on 08/19/2019 6:36:03 AM PDT by MadMax, the Grinning Reaper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: MadMax, the Grinning Reaper

Frosh accused Judicial watch of being Russian agents.


37 posted on 08/19/2019 5:10:44 PM PDT by MarvinStinson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: MarvinStinson; 100American; Abundy; Albion Wilde; AlwaysFree; AnnaSASsyFR; bayliving; BFM; ...

Clean the rolls, baby!


38 posted on 08/24/2019 2:00:19 PM PDT by Tolerance Sucks Rocks (Show me the people who own the land, the guns and the money, and I'll show you the people in charge.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MarvinStinson

I’ve been active in Maryland politics, on and off, for the last 30 years.

Now I’m in Montgomery County. When I bring up voter fraud is something we need to fight against at major Repub meetings, I get deer in the headlights,

Good Lord, It’s beyond frustrating.


39 posted on 08/24/2019 3:31:03 PM PDT by lizma2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-39 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson