Unless the perp poses a threat of great bodily harm to the shooter or others, shooting them in the back as they’re fleeing the scene is never legally justified-whether it be over a 2 dollar beer or a Rolex watch.
In the post you responded to, I pointed out what would happen if you went into prosecutor Lora Fowler's house, stole a $2 beer and just left without threatening anyone or anything.
Fowler would read your mind and "see" that you posed a threat of great bodily harm, and put you in prison for felony home invasion.
You'd get sexed in the back repeatedly.
Think I'd rather get shot, thank you very much.
Only time i would do so is if i believed they were retreating to regroup and do another attack.
“Unless the perp poses a threat of great bodily harm to the shooter or others...”
If a local racial culture makes a mass habit of running off with your property, it can cause you to cease being able to feed your family. That would be bodily harm.
Not that this would go over well in court, but it none the less morally justifies shooting them.
>>Unless the perp poses a threat of great bodily harm to the shooter or others, shooting them in the back as they’re fleeing the scene is never legally justified-whether it be over a 2 dollar beer or a Rolex watch.
Unless you’re in Texas. There are still some bastions of civilization.
people here know a lot of stuff this is not true