Posted on 08/14/2019 9:30:53 PM PDT by bitt
A multipronged government review of whether China successfully hacked former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton's private email server failed to turn up evidence of a successful breach.
Senate investigators, the FBI, the intelligence community inspector general, and Justice Department inspector general were unable to confirm whether an intrusion into the server occurred, according to two top ..
The memo from Sens. Chuck Grassley of Iowa and Ron Johnson of Wisconsin shows concerns about a Chinese state-owned company hacking Clinton's server were likely due to an over-reliance on a simple Google search.
00:04 00:48
Columnist Kristen Soltis Anderson on the expanded Washington Examiner magazine
Watch Full Screen to Skip Ads The Senate inquiry began after an anonymously sourced article from the Daily Caller News Foundation in April 2018 that said a Chinese company succeeded in hacking the server. The report said a firm, located in the Washington, D.C., area, had access to Clinton's emails in real time courtesy of a code embedded in the New York-based server which then made copies of the emails, some of which contained classified information.
The newly released memo shows that these concerns likely were because of mistaken cyber identity, although Grassley and Johnson stressed that “neither the committees nor the FBI were able to confirm whether an intrusion into the server occurred."
Paul Combetta, a tech aide who administered the server, told the FBI he created a "dummy" email account to transfer archived emails into a mailbox entitled "HRC archive" on another server. The existence of that “dummy” email account was revealed in the DOJ inspector general’s report on the Clinton email investigation, dubbed “Midyear Exam" and released in June 2018. Cambetta, who also used software designed to prevent forensic recovery while deleting Clinton’s emails, “refused to speak” with the DOJ inspector general or Congress.
(Excerpt) Read more at washingtonexaminer.com ...
“...Senate investigators, the FBI, the intelligence community inspector general, and Justice Department inspector general were unable to confirm whether an intrusion into the server occurred, according to two top ....”
*************************************
Well ... it’s kind of hard to “confirm” when you willfully go along with not gaining access to the relevant servers,
Oh well. What difference does it make now. She’s not in office. Blah, blah, blah.
So as a google search sidebar I just did a google search of Auschwitz and at first misspelled it. Google doesn’t have it in their spell check.
Typed a bunch of other countries I guessed the spelling of and all showed up corrected
Odd ?
Not only that, but this is the same cabol of unusual suspects that tried to frame and get rid of Trump. What’s not to trust?
His name was Seth Rich. That is all you need to know.
“Odd ?”
Not odd if you’re trying to erase history!
They didn’t have to hack it.
Hillary sold them the password.
“Justice Department inspector general were unable to confirm whether an intrusion into the server occurred”
Unable to confirm a crime occurred with Hillary’s server, yet they couldn’t exonerate Trump of a crime that didn’t occur.
If they had been given full access to the server before they scrubbed it, their research may have actually meant something.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.