The polls are in, and here’s who won the second Democratic debate

vox ^ | Aug 6, 2019 | Andrew Prokop

[McGavin999]

I’m not sure how the ratings are counted, but I bet if you counted those who were still watching after the first 15 minutes they would register down 75%

[Reeses]

Tulsi is the only one with natural talent like Trump and a real threat, but is a total wackadoodle under the hood. We all want Trump to win but the USA would survive a sleepy Biden presidency or even a curry smoker like Tulsi. The others don’t stand a general election chance.

[SunkenCiv]

"This outcome is because the three frontrunners -- me, and the two bringing up the rear -- stand against racism and white supremacy. Speaking of bringing up the rear, Pete Buttigieg!"

[GOPJ]

'I know what you're thinking about,' said Tweedledum; 'but it isn't so, nohow.' 'Contrariwise,' continued Tweedledee, 'if it was so, it might be; and if it were so, it would be; but as it isn't, it ain't. That's logic.'

We had 17 people on the stage last Presidential election and the debate monitors were all democrats. Maybe Megyn was Republican but the rest of them were democrats... and besides Megyn hated Trump ...

The debates were interesting.

Now with democrats the 'journalists' running the debates are NOT ONLY fellow democrats some of them have been democrat activists. They don't want to draw differences that might hurt the brand. So they don't bring up any questions that matter to most Americans.

It's the difference between reading paid advertising by a company and reading an objective news piece about the same company. Propaganda vs news...

So democrat debates are as dead as their ideas. Want some excitement? Want involvement and definition? Invite Hanity and Tucker to be the next moderators.

Not only would millions of people watch but liberals would finally be able to see something other than Tweedle Dee and Tweedle Dum...

[piytar]

+1,000,000