I can remember when sneaking into my bedroom or friend's trusty treehouse to google the latest copy of Playboy, or even PentHouse, to see the half or even fully naked beauties with their tan lines or, (gasp! pubic hair) that while we didn't fully appreciate the full ramifications of the pleasures hidden below those thick luxurious locks horny 13 year old boys could only imagine, our imagination would have to wait to experience these delights outside the glossy pages of these naughty but unforgettable visions of heaven.
Nowadays, these poor prepubescent boys will be terible disapointed and have to guess if these lovelies are truly female, naturally female or have a hidden penis photoshopped out of the picture.
So happy I was a teenager back in the late sixties and earlier seventies.
1 posted on
08/02/2019 3:07:15 PM PDT by
RedMonqey
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-23 next last
To: RedMonqey
2 posted on
08/02/2019 3:08:12 PM PDT by
Maceman
(Trump Trumps Hate!!!)
To: RedMonqey
Im not going to save it... Shoot, the upcoming generation can just hook up with their English teacher!
3 posted on
08/02/2019 3:10:19 PM PDT by
Pikachu_Dad
("the media are selling you a line of soap)
To: RedMonqey
In a world of hardcore internet pornography, hard core pornography DVDs, etc how does a tame, by today’s standards, magazine such as Playboy find its niche???
At one time, Playboy was daring and risked running afoul of obscenity laws. In the early years, Playboy did not show full frontal, presumably to stay on the right side of the obscenity laws in effect at the time.
As times changed, Playboy has been left behind by all the hard core pornography out there.
To: RedMonqey
No they can’t, and won’t.
Have you perused the internet before?
5 posted on
08/02/2019 3:16:41 PM PDT by
EEGator
To: RedMonqey
Playboy and Penthouse are so tame compared to what’s out there today, the old line about ‘I only read it for the articles’ was never more true. Even back in the 70’s, magazines like Hustler and Screw left them in the dust as far as explicit nudity went. I wouldn’t know about that, though. *cough* I only read them for the articles.
To: RedMonqey
Playboy deserves nothing.
7 posted on
08/02/2019 3:18:40 PM PDT by
right way right
(May we remain sober over mere men, for God really is our only true hope.)
To: RedMonqey
I just read Playboy for its articles. Wink wink, nudge nudge. Anyhow, Playboy was founded by a pimp who just got lucky. Good riddance to bad rubbish.
8 posted on
08/02/2019 3:19:16 PM PDT by
Leaning Right
(I have already previewed or do not wish to preview this composition.)
To: RedMonqey
Not unless they open up sexbot playboy clubs. Maybe they have those in Japan.
To: RedMonqey
Remember some controversy in 1976 when Jimmy Carter did an interview with Playboy? I guess Jimmy was trying to prove that he was with it back then.
To: RedMonqey
If it's just a matter of salacious still photos, there are effectively an unlimited supply for free on the 'net.
Nobody is going to pay for those, either on paper or behind a paywall.
13 posted on
08/02/2019 3:42:50 PM PDT by
Salman
(The Democrat agenda in one word -- revenge.)
To: RedMonqey
Playboy had its run, its done.
Just like 8-track tapes, troll dolls and 3-speed transmissions.
14 posted on
08/02/2019 3:46:30 PM PDT by
polymuser
(It's discouraging to think how many people are shocked by honesty and how few by deceit. Noel Coward)
To: RedMonqey
Maybe Playboy should be changed to PlayGAY?
To: RedMonqey
Once I noticed Playboy reviewing video games, they were dead to me.
To: RedMonqey
I totally snuck my dad’s Penthouses that were actually somewhat ingeniously hidden.
Truth be told, I actually did read the articles. There was a really cool one about UFOs and Area 51, which I was into back then. Come to find out, the same publisher also did my two other favorite magazines, Omni and Compute!.
To: RedMonqey
Jeffrey Epstein / Hugh Hefner?
Same mother different brothers.
And Epstein didn’t have dog crap on his carpets.
18 posted on
08/02/2019 4:10:33 PM PDT by
DUMBGRUNT
("The enemy has overrun us. We are blowing up everything. Vive la France!"Dien Bien Phu last message.)
To: RedMonqey
The water is meant to represent gender and sexual fluidity, Mr. Singh said
Sounds like Playboy needs to fire the multitude of idiots on their staff that allowed this thinking to happen
but they probably won't, and will suffer as a result
To: RedMonqey
20 posted on
08/02/2019 4:19:48 PM PDT by
SkyPilot
("I am the way and the truth and the life. No one comes to the Father except through me." John 14:6)
To: RedMonqey
Playboy- the magazine for high brow perverts! The articles are all I buy the magazine for - not!
24 posted on
08/02/2019 5:02:49 PM PDT by
Bommer
(2020- Vote all incumbent congressmen and senators out! VOTE THE BUMS OUT!)
To: RedMonqey
26 posted on
08/02/2019 5:24:38 PM PDT by
SkyDancer
( ~ Just Consider Me A Random Fact Generator ~ Eat Sleep Fly Repeat ~)
To: RedMonqey
I can remember when sneaking into my bedroom or friend's trusty treehouse to google the latest copy of Playboy, or even PentHouse ...
... So happy I was a teenager back in the late sixties and earlier seventies.somehow, i doubt you were googling anything back then
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-23 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson