Posted on 07/29/2019 10:10:17 AM PDT by Kaslin
Between 1803 and 2018, the United States Supreme Court ruled 172 federal laws passed by Congress are unconstitutional. House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.) and Ways and Means Committee Chairman Rep. Richard Neal (D-Mass.), in their effort to demonize President Trump, may inadvertently add a law written in 1924 to this list of doomed legislation. Absent a smoking gun from the Mueller report, the Trump resistance sees the next opportunity to demonize Trump via his tax returns.
It is entirely plausible that IRC 26 U.S.C. § 6103(f), originally passed in response to the Teapot Dome Scandal, (a bribery scandal involving oil leases on federal land during the Harding administration) which states that the Treasury “shall furnish” the [Ways and Means] Committee with “any” requested tax return information, will meet the same fate.
The Fourth Amendment to the Constitution states unequivocally, “The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized.”
Treasury Secretary Mnuchin’s May 6thletter to both the House Ways and Means Committee’s subpoena and lawsuit for the Treasury Department to furnish President Trump’s tax returns, stated that the committee had no “legislative purpose” for requesting Trump’s tax returns, and, therefore, rejected the request. He’s right. They don’t. However, nothing in Section 6103(f) requires any legislative purpose, and therein lies the problem.
There simply is no warrant and no probable cause for anyone in Congress to view these returns. Certainly, our Founders never intended political parties to go on these types of fishing expeditions but, then again, they never envisioned direct federal taxes, the Internal Revenue Service or an income tax where this type of nefarious political behavior can thrive.
Paradoxically, House General Counsel Douglas N. Letter, who is the lead counsel on this House lawsuit, was part of Attorney General Eric Holder’s office who routinely thumbed their noses at congressional subpoena requests relating to the Fast and Furious scandal (alleged U.S. government diversion of firearms to Mexican cartels during the Obama administration that led to congressional oversight investigations), ultimately leading to a Contempt of Congress charge to Holder. Letter is certainly not a person entitled to the moral high ground relating to the executive branch’s response to congressional oversight.
This is the same attorney who left the Justice Department under Trump in 2018 and has fought anti-sanctuary city laws and argued against the census citizen question. Although, the administration should be concerned over a Supreme Court showdown, as Chief Justice John Roberts and Justice Neil Gorsuch were both invited and attended Letter’s retirement party from the Justice Department.
Nightly cable news channels may lead Americans to believe that President Trump is violating the law by not releasing his personal tax returns voluntarily. Nothing in U.S. law, however, requires this disclosure.
Richard Nixon was the first to disclose his tax returns, ultimately due to a scandal involving the donation of his vice-presidential papers. Nixon claimed a hefty deduction for the donation but had to backdate the date of the gift to qualify—a bit of legerdemain that enabled him to pay in taxes about what a lower middle-class taxpayer would.
Reporter Jack White of the Providence Journal won the Pulitzer Prize for breaking the story, which was leaked to him by an IRS employee in 1973. The IRS leaker was never identified or prosecuted.
I fully expect Trump’s tax returns to be leaked by some low-level ideologue at the IRS at some point—and whoever does it will be revered as a hero by fanatical anti-Trumpsters in the media.
And make no mistake about it: A 77,000-plus page tax code creates a target-rich environment. Trump’s real estate holdings, multiple entities, foreign holdings and trusts make his voluminous returns ripe for unwarranted criticisms. Trump’s opponents will exploit our confusing tax code to make perfectly legal activity seem criminal.
They will argue that Trump is too rich, or he isn’t rich enough. His use of deductions and legal tax shelters will get portrayed as “tax dodging.” His charitable contributions will be scrutinized.
If he has been made to pay penalties for underreporting or has paid the IRS interest at any point (even before his presidency), he will be deemed a criminal, even though most of us who have had complex tax returns typically face additional taxes due or penalties, despite employing highly skilled tax professionals.
The latest data available from the IRS showed 2.2 million tax return errors in 2015 without an audit involved. Several years ago, Money Magazine gave a rather mundane sample family tax return to complete to 45 tax professionals and received 45 different tax outcomes, some as much as 160 percent different in the amount of taxes due or refunds to be received. It is literally impossible for anyone with complex tax returns to absolutely know beyond a shadow of a doubt if our tax professional did it right.
Absent a criminal warrant with probable cause, the anti-Trump Resistance has no legal claim to view his tax returns. This battle will surely end up in the Supreme Court, where it belongs and where IRC 6103(f) should be ruled unconstitutional. It is completely President Trump’s prerogative not to divulge his tax returns, and he alone can calculate the political risks—if any. The U.S. Constitution guarantees him that right.
David Thomas Roberts(@TexasAuthor)is a serial entrepreneur, inventor, public speaker, and author who found himself battling the IRS as he—along with a long list of conservatives—was targeted year after year with audits.
At this point he shouldn’t just because it upsets them so much.
If the returns are leaked, the leaker and the receiver of the leak must be killed dead within 24 hours.
No mercy, no quarter...... death
Democrats are so stupid and illiterate they wouldn’t even be able to read his tax returns
If he doesn’t then he might start to get bad publicity. /s
I think he should stand his ground and never give his tax returns up, that is a voluntary thing, not a requirement or a law. I heard not long ago democrats are trying to pass a law...
The one thing I notice though, according to Trump, his taxes have been under IRS audit for around 10 years. If they haven’t found anything yet, the democrats in congress are not likely to. Just another fishing expedition, and it will fail.
If Congress moves to make a law that’s designed to target one man - and that man is Trump the Supreme Court will blow them out of the water and the whole nation will turn against democrats.
We ‘get’ that king of heavy hand... all of us ‘get it’ because we’re all known powerful thugs who like cheating...
Tax returns are a nono for release. The potential for privacy violation and identity theft are just there.
He should keep them private forever, if for no other reason than to keep some chunk of wingnuts perpetually obsessed with obtaining it - and thus not getting into some other sort of trouble with the time they waste in the chase.
It seems to me that I read somewhere a person has a right to be secure in their persons, hoses, papers, and effect, against unreasonable searches and seizures unless a warrant is issued on probable cause.
Wouldn’t PDJT’s tax returns fall under that perview?
“The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized.”
Search isn’t turning it up online, but from memory, but a Will Rodgers quote goes to the effect that "you agonize over filling out your tax form, and after you’re finished you don’t know if you are a cheat or a sucker.”There simply is no warrant and no probable cause for anyone in Congress to view these returns. Certainly, our Founders never intended political parties to go on these types of fishing expeditions but, then again, they never envisioned direct federal taxes, the Internal Revenue Service or an income tax where this type of nefarious political behavior can thrive.I like the quote from the article,
If Trump ever cheated on his taxes, why hasn't the IRS caught it yet?
I'm pretty sure that the IRS has been auditing Trump's returns for decades by now.
Or, said differently,
forcing us to hand over everything financial to the IRS on penalty of being charged with a crime. If the caveats which should have been put in the 16h Amendment - the public was assured that the income tax would only fall on the 1%, for example - it wouldn’t have passed. And this issue of conflict with the Fourth Amendment . . . surely it would have created a problem if the public knew a president’s tax returns would be used as a political weapon against him.
Trump should release his tax returns fully redacted, except for one word “Trump”
And therein lies the problem. Get rid of the IRS and income tax and these problems are solved immediately.
At this point, I think all Democrat demands for any information can be ignored. After wasting three years on “Russia, Russia, Russia” while their constituents were getting killed en masse in the cities they run, why should anyone listen to them?
I guess we all have selective memories The reason Trump should publish his tax forms is that he said he would, three times during his campaign, ‘when the audit is over.”
Is the audit not over 29 months later?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.