1:02:10
She said she met Assange and he said they weren’t from Russians but from “internal source from the Hillary campaign or someone who knew Hillary, an enemy”
My comment: I heard this a long time ago that Assange said it was not from the Russians.
One wonders... why would the Russians even want DNC emails ?
Yes, he made a bit of a production of it. No state actor.
He also offered a reward for info on Seth Rich killers.
WikiLeaks Offers Reward In Search For Democratic Party Staffer's Killer - NPR, August 10, 2016.
The "17 intelligence agencies agree it was Russia" came after. Yes, 17 intelligence agencies really did say Russia was behind hacking - USA Toady, October 2016
The press has been gaslighting the public on this and many other subjects. This is not a new practice. It is what the press effectively --is--, manipulator of public belief.
Right, Assange’s claim isn’t exactly news but I guess it has renewed relevance thanks to the Butowski court filing. Even the Ratner video isn’t exactly new in that she made the remarks at a public symposium with cameras rolling. It’s not like made them in secret and they’re just now being revealed. And even if that were the case I don’t see how it would move things beyond what Assange is already known to have claimed. That said, I think it’s only a matter of time before something comes to light that proves his claim and clinches the fact that the source was Seth Rich.
You, me and the rest of us. The rest of the MSM have had boogers in their ears.......