Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Time to Give the CO2 Endangerment Finding a ‘Tremendous Whack’
Townhall.com ^ | July 20, 2019 | Jay Lehr

Posted on 07/20/2019 4:47:40 AM PDT by Kaslin

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-30 next last

1 posted on 07/20/2019 4:47:40 AM PDT by Kaslin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

OK!! Everybody pay attention!
Lesson for today:
1. The sun is 1,300,000 times as big as the earth.
2. The sun is a giant nuclear furnace that controls the climates of all its planets.
3. The earth is one of the sun’s planets.
4. The earth is a speck in comparison to the size of the sun.
5. Inhabitants of the earth are less than specks.
Study Question: How do less-than-specks in congress plan to control the sun?


2 posted on 07/20/2019 4:53:47 AM PDT by abclily
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: abclily

We get it. Is that spam all you have to offer?


3 posted on 07/20/2019 5:01:03 AM PDT by deadrock
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: abclily

Carbon dioxide comprises .04 percent by VOLUME of the Earths atmosphere. That’s 4 one hundredths or ONE percent. Got that you climate justice warriors? You complete useful idiots of the watermelon operatives who are the creepy commie subversives who should be sucking on a pulled pin grenade.


4 posted on 07/20/2019 5:05:54 AM PDT by HighSierra5
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: deadrock

Spam. I like Spam. Especially when camping and you fry it up with eggs drowned in coffee.


5 posted on 07/20/2019 5:08:18 AM PDT by HighSierra5
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: HighSierra5

Now I am hungry, but not for repetitiveness. Give me spam I can sink my teeth in, any day.


6 posted on 07/20/2019 5:14:01 AM PDT by deadrock
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

Just read that to some in the clean energy movement, hydro power isn’t clean energy unless it comes from “free flowing streams.” Thus Hydro Quebec’s power that NY wants to use isn’t clean energy because it comes from water that has been dammed up. Totally insane!


7 posted on 07/20/2019 5:14:40 AM PDT by finnsheep
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: deadrock

You have a better syllogism to share?


8 posted on 07/20/2019 5:16:09 AM PDT by abclily
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: finnsheep

They are insane and there is no stopping them with the ballot box.


9 posted on 07/20/2019 5:17:33 AM PDT by deadrock
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

I think that humans can breathe CO2 up to concentrations of 1% without any discomfort. That is not the case with many forms of energy that we used prior to the industrial age, for example, wood fires used to cook and heat homes. In areas where people still depend on those old technologies, lung diseases from breathing concentrated smoke are a major health issue.

Furthermore, CO2 is essential to ALL life. Trying to limit it poses an existential threat to all living things.


10 posted on 07/20/2019 5:20:46 AM PDT by exDemMom (Current visual of the hole the US continues to dig itself into: http://www.usdebtclock.org/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: abclily

Sure. After you post yours another thousand times, I will release it to the world.


11 posted on 07/20/2019 5:21:19 AM PDT by deadrock
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

95% of CO2 in the atmosphere is natural, only 5% is man made.......


12 posted on 07/20/2019 5:24:25 AM PDT by Hot Tabasco (I'm in the cleaning business.......I launder money)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

The endangerment finding was basically all modeling from the UN IPCC reports. Totally made up nonsense predictions going out 100 years.


13 posted on 07/20/2019 5:27:52 AM PDT by I got the rope
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Hot Tabasco
95% of CO2 in the atmosphere is natural, only 5% is man made.......

Do you have a reference for that? I'm an AGW denier in general, but they say CO2 concentrations have risen from about 270 PPM to 410 PPM over the past century. If most of the CO2 is not manmade, what accounts for the rise, and why isn't it better publicized?

14 posted on 07/20/2019 5:38:06 AM PDT by Pearls Before Swine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Pearls Before Swine
This guy is great, I'm on his email list.....

Human CO2 Emissions Have Little Effect on Atmospheric CO2

15 posted on 07/20/2019 5:40:27 AM PDT by Hot Tabasco (I'm in the cleaning business.......I launder money)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Pearls Before Swine
what accounts for the rise

Wild fires, and especially volcanoes.......

About two weeks ago there was a huge wildfire in Alberta Canada and the smoke carried all the way to S.E. Michigan and in sufficient amount to make the totally cloudless sky hazy.......

16 posted on 07/20/2019 5:51:54 AM PDT by Hot Tabasco (I'm in the cleaning business.......I launder money)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: HighSierra5

Me too !! and have you seen the number of alternative flavors SPAM now comes in? I just noticed this a few days ago. I thought that SPAM only came in regular and smoked ... some look yummy.


17 posted on 07/20/2019 5:53:01 AM PDT by ByteMercenary (Healthcare Insurance is *NOT* a Constitutional right.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

Everyone who believes CO2 is a dangerous pollutant should stop exhaling it.

Problem solved.


18 posted on 07/20/2019 5:58:38 AM PDT by Lurkinanloomin (Natural Born Citizen Means Born Here Of Citizen Parents_Know Islam, No Peace-No Islam, Know Peace)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: abclily

I like it.
Not everyone has seen it.
Keep posting it.


19 posted on 07/20/2019 6:00:16 AM PDT by Lurkinanloomin (Natural Born Citizen Means Born Here Of Citizen Parents_Know Islam, No Peace-No Islam, Know Peace)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Hot Tabasco

I’m halfway through the paper. It’s easy reading for a first take. If what he says is true, the IPCC model is incredibly flawed. I can understand “compartmentalization” of different parts of the CO2, such as in the ocean, or in shellfish, or minerals, versus that in the atmosphere. But, along with the author, I can’t see any justification for treating CO2 differently depending on whether it was “naturally” or “anthromorphically” generated. That’s like a chemical bill of attainder.

Also, its very interesting that a simple exponential model (what he calls “e-time” engineers call “time constant”) accounts better for 14CO2 decay from nuclear weapons tests better than the IPCC model.

If what he says is true, how can the IPCC model creators have been so dumb? Overfitting a model violates Occam’s Razor, and usually doesn’t work out well.

Finally, to your second comment, about wild fires and volcanoes... is there any reason to believe they’re worse over the past century than they were before? Or was there a dip in CO2 due to a fire/volcano quiet period in the late 18th century?


20 posted on 07/20/2019 6:06:53 AM PDT by Pearls Before Swine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-30 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson