Posted on 07/19/2019 2:30:22 AM PDT by Morgana
i guess he’s not so “under cover” anymore
NOT tired of WINNING yet!
Keep it coming. The misery, fright(?)
we see on a number of faces is a first for most of US.
I’m trying to understand why they should get any “damages”
Nice. I tried to impress this upon my son.
It pretty much boiled down to: Its okay to fail. Every one does. Learn from failure. Whats not okay is quitting.
L
Is this then guy Kamala Harris investigated instead of investigating the baby parts sellers.
>Im trying to understand why they should get any damages
I ask the same question, but I ‘misspell’ mine “taxpayer $$”
Kamala Harris is responsible for tying up this case and videos in court for years.
I wonder how much $$$ PP has contributed to her campaigns?
Judge Orrick previously faced scrutiny presiding over the case because of his history founding, promoting, and donating to a Planned Parenthood clinic in San Francisco run by Plaintiff Planned Parenthood Northern California. That he would rule so strongly against Planned Parenthood speaks volumes.
With San Fran being such a gay and happy life, why do they need abortionariums there?
Kind of scary you have to go to court to tell the truth about abortion.
Judge William Orrick III rejected Planned Parenthoods false and long-running smear that accused CMP citizen journalists, including David Daleiden, of attempting to incite threats and violence by publishing the undercover videos.
About time.
[Kind of scary you have to go to court to tell the truth about abortion.]
The hour is late and the day is long past.
This kind of horror is the Democrat gold standard of “women’s health”.
A euphemism for systematic slaughter.
[With San Fran being such a gay and happy life, why do they need abortionariums there?]
San Fran Nan said SanFagSicko “is the best example of living the Gospel”.
And then someone here said “Nancy, you’ll be naked in Heaven” (don’t know if it was the same thread).
This was many years ago. I just shook my head.
A US judge was able to figure this out? Amazing.
This is a democrat tactic. Get a liberal judge to rule incorrectly, blatantly so, to tie someone up in court costs of appeals. They know they won’t win but they will cost someone money. Even is the target wins getting them to pay court costs gets tied up in endless appeals.
I don't think it would be Heaven if we had to look at a naked Pelosi.
LOL
Here is a link to a YouTube video where David talks about Kamala Harris and Planned Parenthoods.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.