Posted on 07/09/2019 9:39:44 AM PDT by C19fan
Actions speak louder than words.
President Trump has yet to comment on the arrest of his former friend Jeffrey Epstein, but court documents suggest that he made his opinion of the convicted pedophile well known years ago.
An ongoing lawsuit between Epstein and Bradley Edwards, who represented multiple underage victims in their civil suits against the convicted pedophile, reveals that President Trump banned Epstein from his private club in Palm Beach, Mar-a-Lago.
The reason for that, according to the filing, was that Epstein had 'sexually assaulted an underage girl at the club.'
(Excerpt) Read more at dailymail.co.uk ...
Should Trump Fire Accosta?
This must be why the so-called “news” media reported that the Epstein arrest should “worry” the President.
/s
Looks like this thing is like a nuclear bomb exploding in slow motion, and Trump pressed the button.
Trump isn’t draining the swamp. He’s letting off a nuclear bomb and frying it.
He is slowly gaining control.
Yeah, butt the ‘lames’ will point out that PDJT was merely jealous that he didn’t get the chance. We know the routine.
I try to tell everyone that will bother to listen that this election cycle is like a long distance marathon. Who is ahead now has little to do with who will win. Smart runners lay back and pour on the steam at the end, when the leaders are spent. You have to peak at the right time, and this year ain’t it.
I’m sure Pelosi is aware of this as well.
Exactly
President Trump is what the left has fraudulently claimed to be:
1. Change you can believe in.
2. For the children.
God bless and keep him courageous and strong.
Trump just said he had a problem years ago with Epstein, did not elaborate. Said he had not spoken to the Pedo in 15 years.
Acosta only approved the plea deal arranged by Robert Mueller. Granted, he shouldn’t have done it, but Mueller plays hardball and Acosta was probably afraid of him.
Supposedly, Mueller protected Epstein because Epstein gave him information for a financial case he was pursuing.
“Should Trump Fire Accosta?”
______________________________
HELL, YES.
Should Trump Fire Accosta?
Absolutely not
A key witness died, the state was pressuring him to drop the case entirely. However he didn’t want to give up and let Epstein go unscathed. The plea bargain was all he could get because the case was never going to trial anyways (would have been dropped, zero punishment for Epstein)
Acosta was the only good guy surrounded by snakes and thieves (politicians), but got what he could get so it wouldn’t have been totally dropped.
The apparatus of the left is about to haul the Stormy Daniels nag out of the barn. Just wait and see.......within 24 hours.
I’m still waiting for the msm to report on this banning. Instead, last night’s NBC evening news reported he and Trump “palled” around.
This is actually an amazingly large story.
It’s going to take a couple of days (at least) to get a handle on all of it.
Dunno. US Attorneys are often overruled by AGs and that means he could have been told what to do by Eric the Red Holder. He’s done some good things in his career, and some dumb ones. He doesn’t seem to be a particularly good administrator.
Labor Sec. isn’t a spot I’d invest much political capital in, but see how the storm goes and if it makes sense to give him the boot, it wouldn’t be the worst thing.
A country (UK) must present a request to the host (US) to give its consent for appointment of a given Ambassador. The host country has the right to not give consent. After the Ambassador has been accepted:
"The 1961 Vienna Treaty on Diplomatic Relations... Article 9 states, "The receiving state may at any time and without having to explain its decision, notify the sending state that the head of the mission or any member of the diplomatic staff of the mission is persona non grata or that any other member of the staff of the mission is not acceptable. In any such case, the sending state shall, as appropriate, either recall the person concerned or terminate his functions with the mission."
Kick Sir Kim's weaselly @$$ out!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.