Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: rintintin

Closet lesbian hindu moron.

There may or may not have been WMD in Iraq. But we lost it cause politicians didn’t let troops EXTERMINATE Iraq army and the shia militias, and blow up 90% of the mosques.

We needed to DE-JIHADIFY Iraq like we denazified Germany.

Either that or bomb them to ruin and just take their oil. Feed only those who give up the koran.


4 posted on 06/26/2019 8:16:16 PM PDT by BTerclinger (MAGA)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: BTerclinger

Tulsi served in Iraq. That’s more than any member of the Bush or Cheney family can say


6 posted on 06/26/2019 8:19:02 PM PDT by rintintin (q)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

To: BTerclinger

“There may or may not have been WMD in Iraq.”

There is. A 2005 report from the United States Department of State claimed that Iran began work on offensive biological weapons during the Iran–Iraq War, and that their large legitimate bio-technological and bio-medical industry “could easily hide pilot to industrial-scale production capabilities for a potential BW program, and could mask procurement of BW-related process equipment”. The report further said that “available information about Iranian activities indicates a maturing offensive program with a rapidly evolving capability that may soon include the ability to deliver these weapons by a variety of means” That was 14 years ago.

A U.S. Central Intelligence Agency report dated January 2001 speculated that Iran had manufactured and stockpiled chemical weapons – including blister, blood, choking, and probably nerve agents, and the bombs and artillery shells to deliver them. It further claimed that during the first half of 2001, Iran continued to seek production technology, training, expertise, equipment, and chemicals from entities in Russia and China that could be used to help Iran reach its goal of having indigenous nerve agent production capability. 18 years ago. The Fajr-3, Shahab-2, Shahab-3, Sejil 1 and Sejil 2 are all operational missiles with varying payloads and ranges from 300 to 2100 KM. All are capable of chem, bio, and nuclear capacity. A Shahab-5, an intercontinental ballistic missile has been alleged but not proven to be under development. Don’t trust them. It’s been known that Iran has had nuclear capacity since 2006 as they got the technology from Pakistan, Russia, and North Korea. If the Shahab-5 becomes a reality, they will have intercontinental capacity. First stop, our allies in Israel.

rwood


30 posted on 06/26/2019 8:45:50 PM PDT by Redwood71
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

To: BTerclinger

Gabbard was born on April 12, 1981, in Leloaloa, Maoputasi County, on American Samoa’s main island of Tutuila.

so we have ANOTHER pick of the globalist elite that is not an Article II, Section 1, clause 5 Natural Born Citizen.

Because of Obama’s 8 years, we cannot get the SCOTUS to adjudicate this Article III matter for the first time in US history.

Tuaua v. United States

According to the Immigration and Nationality Act (INA), the people born in American Samoa – including those born on Swains Island – are “nationals but not citizens of the United States at birth”. If a child is born on any of these islands to any U.S. citizen, then that child is considered a national and a citizen of the United States at birth. In an amicus curiae brief filed in federal court, Samoan Congressman Faleomavaega supported the legal interpretation that the Citizenship Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment does not extend birthright citizenship to United States nationals born in unincorporated territories.
All U.S. nationals have statutory rights to reside in the United States (i.e., the 50 states and Puerto Rico), and may apply for citizenship by naturalization after three months of residency by passing a test in English and civics, and by taking an oath of allegiance to the United States. However, the INA makes clear that any “national but not a citizen of the United States” who at any time has been convicted of any aggravated felony, whether the aggravated felony was committed inside or outside the United States, is “debarred from becoming a citizen of the United States”


52 posted on 06/26/2019 9:05:31 PM PDT by DMZFrank
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

To: BTerclinger

I detect some common sense in your post .


117 posted on 06/27/2019 9:01:33 AM PDT by PA-RIVER
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson