Skip to comments.Laughable! Nadler Calls John Dean to Testify As He Kicks Off Dry-Run Impeachment
Posted on 06/10/2019 1:31:33 PM PDT by Kaslin
RUSH: Does anybody but me find it just outrageous that Nadler is calling John Dean up there and that the Drive-Bys are excited about it? (laughing) Im sorry. Look! John Dean to Testify on Presidential Obstruction! Whats he gonna say? Nixon did it! How many times have I told you? The only thing these people have is whats in their playbook from the past. These people on the left cannot innovate. So theyve gotta replay Watergate here. So theyve gotta go get John Dean, whos 81 years old.
As far as I know, he has never been in the Trump administration, had nothing to do with the dossier, and if they want to talk about obstruction here, there isnt any on Trumps part. They havent found any. But yet theyre gonna have John Dean (laughing) up there to tell em what obstruction looks like from his experience in the Nixon administration. I dont know. I may be I guess Im the only one that finds this funny. A lot of people are scared about it. Rush, I cant believe theyre going to this extent.
Folks, its what we always get each and every day.
Its not even news, its fake news, and its all oriented toward destroying Donald Trump.
RUSH: John Dean. John Dean (audio sound bite number 24 ) was on with CNN this morning. Question to John Dean: Today youll be back before Congress all these years later, after you helped get rid of Richard Nixon. We have your prepared statement here, but tell us what your overarching message is to Congress.
DEAN: Im clearly not a fact witness, but I hope I can give them some context and show them how strikingly like Watergate what were seeing now and as reported is the Mueller report is. The fact that, uh, Nixon was hands on very early is just like Trump hands on very early. The firing of Comey was certainly not dissimilar from some of the actions that Nixon took.
RUSH: The firing of Comey was entirely called for! It was legal! It was recommended by the deputy attorney general, Rod Rosenstein. It was not obstruction of justice. It should have happened earlier, as Comey has continued to prove with his post-FBI directorship life. He should have been fired long ago. He should have been fired the day after that July 5th press conference where he assumed the role of attorney general, determining whos gonna be prosecuted and who isnt and announcing why, then going out and listing all the crimes Hillary Clinton committed, and then saying, Were not charging her?
You never do that! You never do that. You never If youre not gonna charge somebody, you shut up about them! But remember, that whole thing was really the exoneration of Hillary Clinton. That was what that was all about, and it was that firing When people started clamoring for Trump to be charged with obstruction, thats when Barr wrote his first memo. Just out of the blue, not as the attorney general, he wrote a 19-page No, it wasnt 19 pages. He wrote a long memo about how the executive (Trump) could not obstruction justice by executing constitutionally mandated duties.
He could not obstruct justice by following through on duties the Constitution allows him.
That was the point of Barrs first memo that the Drive-Bys hated, and the left demanded, Who asked you to write this? Nobody. Im just shocked at what Im seeing here, and I wanted to get my reaction to it on the record. Its outrageous. Fired? Obstruction of justice for firing an FBI director? Heres John Dean trying to say What is this, Nixon was hands on like Trump is hands on? Hes president, for crying out loud! What does that mean? The fact that Nixon was hands on very early on just like Trump hands on So? Firing of Comey not dissimilar from some of the actions that Nixon took? Trump was not trying to stop the investigation. This is Its just bogus.
RUSH: The Drive-By Media is anxiously assembled on Capitol Hill, eagerly awaiting an upcoming congressional hearing. The Democrats are beginning a public airing of the Mueller report. Heres how AP reports it: President Donald Trump says its case closed. But Democrats are just getting started with Robert Mueller .
House Democrats have scheduled a series of hearings this coming week on the special counsels report as they intensify their focus on the Russia probe and pick up the pace on an investigative path in the words of Speaker Nancy Pelosi that some of them hope leads to impeachment.
Now, the Mueller report is out. Its been out since the first part of May. And in it Mueller found no evidence of any collusion. Look, I know, folks. It gets tiresome. There was never any evidence, and Mueller knew this the day he took the job. But none of that matters.
As far as Jerry Nadler and the Democrats are concerned, the Mueller report found collusion, the Mueller report found obstruction of justice, and theyre now gonna conduct hearings on it. It is the most surreal thing.
Imagine a jury coming back and finding a defendant not guilty and the prosecutors deciding to go to a different court and start the trial all over again without a judge, picking a jury to go in there and fake another trial without a judge, just rent out a courtroom and do it even though theyve got a not-guilty verdict, which is essentially whats happening here.
And theyre operating under the theory that Mueller did find evidence that William Barr has covered up, redacted, or withheld, and theyre trying to get more documents released from the DOJ to prove their case.
But what this actually is is a pretend or preliminary impeachment hearing. Theyre giving it a dry run. Thats what this is. And that is why the Drive-By Media is so excited, so anxious, can barely contain themselves. But what Nadler is doing thats why John Deans up there. Does somebody want to try to compare whats Dean got to talk about here, really?
If you want to make a comparison to Watergate and this situation, what was Watergate? A bunch of guys working for Nixon, tried to break into the Democrat National Committee. They left evidence that they were there and they got caught. Okay. Well, what is the connecting event to todays scandal?
The connecting event is somebody tried and succeeded in hacking the Democrat National Committee computer network. Except that it wasnt Donald Trump. And the Democrats dont even say it was. The Democrats are saying that its the Russians. But nobody has any evidence that it was the Russians. And what evidence there is suggested that this hack or attack had to come from inside because of the recorded data transferred speeds.
Data being downloaded from their computer network to external drives could not have happened over the internet because the speeds were much, much faster, even with gigabit Ethernet and fiber, much faster than you could get so people think it was an inside job. But theres no record of Trump, theres not even an allegation of Trump trying to break into the Democrat National Committee computers. The Russians supposedly did that.
Now, originally it was the Russians doing that to benefit Trump. But then we were told the Russians also tried to break into the RNC computers. And then we were told the Democrats wouldnt even let the FBI examine their servers or their network. They hired a private sector firm called CrowdStrike, and CrowdStrike is who said the Russians tried to break in the Democrat network. But we dont have any official evidence.
So whats John Dean talking about? Theres nothing to conflate here. DNC headquarters broken into by people working for Nixon in 1972, but what happened here is nothing to do with Republicans breaking into the Democrat computer or network.
So what this really is, Jerry Nadler is convening his show trial, the AP, the Drive-Bys are calling it a public airing of the Mueller report, and Nadler and the Democrats and Pelosi are assuring their lunatic base that theres more in this than what we know. Mueller redacted a bunch of and Barr redacted a bunch and were gonna get to the bottom of it. And their late-night comics late-night haters are proceeding on the basis that theres something in the Mueller report that we still dont know thats being covered up, and it proves Trump colluded.
But what this really is is a dry run for a future, real impeachment proceeding. Thats what Nadlers going for. And in doing this, I must say that hes doing this not with the consent of Nancy Pelosi. Pelosi does not want him doing this, Pelosi doesnt want him getting close to this, she doesnt want this to happen. And Nadler couldnt help himself. Hes proceeding anyway. And the Drive-Bys are assembled breathlessly because they are hoping and praying just like they were every day for two years that some new bit of information proving Trump colluded is going to be found and is going to be produced and Trump is gonna be sent packing and Hillary is gonna become president by the end of the week.
RUSH: I got an idea. I got an idea for Jerry Nadler. By the way, Nadlers popping pills. I just saw him pop a pill, grab a bottle of water, you know, people jiggle it around in their mouth before he swallowed. He just popped a pill sitting there in the chairmans chair. Remember that video, the audio we had of the guy eating like crazy while he was being interviewed? He just popped a pill. You know, he had an incident there, he was at an event with the mayor of New York, de Blasio, and they thought he had dehydration.
Anyway, I have an idea. If theyre gonna call John Dean, you know what they ought to do? They ought to bring in a concessionaire, pop a bunch of popcorn this is a great idea I got in an email note from a friend. Pop a bunch of popcorn, play All the Presidents Men, and then bring in Dustin Hoffman and Robert Redford and call them as witnesses.
If youre gonna call John Dean as a witness in Trump-Russia collusion, go all the way, play All the Presidents Men, to hell with anything else, and then get Dustin Hoffman in there and Redford and then follow them up with Woodward and Bernstein. I mean, if youre gonna go Watergate on this, go all out.
CNN is so breathless, they can barely contain themselves that John Dean is going to testify on the Mueller report. John Dean has done nothing but read the damn thing. He didnt have anything to do with well, its senseless to waste time pointing out.
Nadler’s belt is strangling his tits.
It figures that Nadler would have the bright idea of digging up this coprolite.
Fat B@st@rd is so desperate, so panicky, so ridiculous, so incompetent.
If Fat B@st@rd ever tripped over the rule of law, he would eat it.
Calling Dean to testify is proof Nasty Nadler has nothing to go on because Dean has nothing to offer.
THE WATERGATE AMENDMENT by John Fitzgerald answers what Watergate was all about...Making Nelson Rockefeller President. Trump isnt the first President to be removed from office with the help of Government agencies. Oh yes, John Dean was from central casting for the role he played, a skunk.
It makes sense. John Dean brought down Nixon. Obviously he can bring down Trump.
Oh, they got a “conservative” to testify. Completely balanced and objective then.
Nadless, AKA Jabba the Cuck.
Nadler sure is a weird looking troll
In Watergate, Repubs invaded Dem offices.
Dean will make an a** of himself.
How much is Nadler paying him?
Pizza doesn’t count although the sheer volume of Nadler’s might count as a bribe. /s
Thanks for posting...though it is etched in my mind.
Indicative that Jabba the Nad has nothing because we all know if there was an iota of info that could be twisted into anything resembling the original charges that bunch of commies would have been on it flies on a cow pie.
I can’t believe no one here has mentioned John Dean himself was CONVICTED OF OBSTRUCTION, disbarred and actually went to jail.
“John Dean is a convicted felon, sentenced to a prison term of one-to-four-years, and disbarred from the practice of law for the past 45 years but he remains a media hero, the toast of the liberal Eastern Establishment, because he changed his story of what had happened to save himself and to sink his former colleagues. Fact is, the ugly truth about John Dean is far different from what the American people have been led to believe.”
Indicative that Jabba the Nad has nothing because we all know if there was an iota of info that could be twisted into anything resembling the original charges that bunch of commies would have been on it like flies on a cow pie.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.