Now, it is OK to destroy the entire world in the name of fighting Trump.
According to anyone left of the average FReeper.
If you were a self-designated “King of the World”, and you found yourself looking at the very real possibility of a long prison sentence destroying your life and legacy, how many lives would you be willing to destroy, or urge others to destroy, to stay out??
>> Journalists usually imagine themselves holding the powerful to account
They’re typically arrogant B students at best.
What goes around, comes around. Take away everything someone has, and some people take that personally. Someday, one of these doxing reporters is gonna get their lamp blowed out. That’s my prediction.
“Speaking Truth To Powerless”
And we are supposed to feel sorry for these nosy fascist neighbors called journalists when they lose their jobs.
The neighbors who sent jews and kulaks to concentration camps were journalists
Interesting problem beling, how do you attack the attackers?
Republicans will not. The deep state will not. Dept of Justice wull not. How do you attack a power greater than yourself. By definition, they are more powerful, if only percieved.
A defensive counter attack group requires good lawyers and plenty of planning.
-PJ
Also by definition of power being greater, eventually there is no free speech and people are murdered by the millions by the State.
Before that happens, only dissidents survive a difficult life fighting greater powers with the hope of one day obtaining a protected position.
So the answer is only those accepting a life of dissidence survive.
There’s only one reason they’re not doing more terror attacks like the Republican softball game multiple shooting.
No, it’s not because it’s illegal, and it’s not because they can’t find someone who doesn’t mind going to jail for a long time for doing it.
The only reason they’re not engaging in open murder against our side is because they know it will hurt their chances to keep the House in 2020. If it wasn’t for that, they’d be hunting us down in the streets and in our homes.
That, and the fact that they know that a lot of us will shoot back, and will destroy what we aim at.
Wasn’t there a news story about a year ago where a man destroyed by newspaper reporting went on a shooting spree in the newspaper office?
I wonder if this man has any legal recourse? It certainly sounds as if Facebook handing over his data to a nosy journalist is some kind of violation of privacy, if nothing else. Heck, FB won’t even give data to the police in a legitimate investigation of a real crime.
I hope he gets support from some kind of conservative legal organization.
Democrats are scum.
I wonder if a case could be made in civil court to win $250M from the Daily Beast like the kid who was wronged by the Indian Vietnam vet fraud and the news agencies who slandered him.
That’s all that’s left of “journalism” these days — the scorched earth destruction of political enemies, and the “see no evil, hear no evil” unbridled support of political allies.