Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

NASA Covers for SpaceX
americanthinker.com ^ | 5/22/2019 | Andrew E. Harrod

Posted on 05/22/2019 9:26:23 AM PDT by rktman

Video footage of SpaceX’s Crew Dragon space capsule exploding on the ground during an April 20 test at Cape Canaveral Air Force Station in Florida was leaked online by the next day. Yet SpaceX and NASA are unacceptably dragging their feet in explaining this taxpayer-financed fiasco in the American space program and thus continued SpaceX’s worrisome undue influence on government.

SpaceX’s April 20 press release with its “anomaly” euphemism was immediately contradicted by images provided by a photographer from a local Florida publication covering a surfing festival on a beach near Cape Canaveral. In the telling photos, toxic reddish smoke clouds billow upwards from the space center. The accident is a poor omen for the Crew Dragon, in which NASA wants to transport astronauts to the International Space Station (ISS).

Such visual evidence helped prompt an April 24 editorial from the Orlando Sentinel, a Florida newspaper that often covers the space program in the region. “‘Anomaly’ is a vague industry buzzword that tells the public zilch about what happened to a program that the federal government is spending billions on,” the editorial criticized. “There’s been no press conference. No opportunity to ask questions of company executives. No detailed news releases. No photos or video of the damage.”

(Excerpt) Read more at americanthinker.com ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Government; Philosophy
KEYWORDS: bfrc; elonmusk; falcon9; falconheavy; nasa; spaceteslas; spacex
Pretty sure we talked about the "BFRC" close to the day of the event. MonoMethylHydrazine(no relation to Jack Hydrazine)[MMH] and Nitrogen Tetroxide [N2O4] can make for a crappy day when in the wrong place.
1 posted on 05/22/2019 9:26:23 AM PDT by rktman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: rktman

2 posted on 05/22/2019 9:31:53 AM PDT by BenLurkin (The above is not a statement of fact. It is either satire or opinion. Or both.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rktman

The author is an idiot. That’s why they test things.

Spaceflight is hard.


3 posted on 05/22/2019 9:35:58 AM PDT by PreciousLiberty (Make America Greater Than Ever!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PreciousLiberty
The author is an idiot.

Well, he ain't no Rocket Surgeon. Or Brain Scientist.

4 posted on 05/22/2019 9:39:16 AM PDT by Yo-Yo ( is the /sarc tag really necessary?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: rktman

A slight improvement over C Stoff + T Stoff bi-propellant...


5 posted on 05/22/2019 9:39:55 AM PDT by null and void (The press is always lying. When they aren't actively lying, they are actively concealing the truth.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rktman
Testing discovers errors...

...but when the Crewed Dragon's sibling - the Cargo Dragon - attaches to the hyper-expensive and manned ISS on a regular basis...

...then NASA and SpaceX have a responsibility to better communicate the state of the investigation.

Prudence also requires that Cargo Dragon flights get delayed until it can be shown that the failure happened in a portion of the Crewed Dragon that does not share design or components with it.

(But what the hell do I know, I haven't killed 17 astronauts in preventable accidents.)

6 posted on 05/22/2019 9:46:35 AM PDT by Yossarian
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PreciousLiberty

Exactly. That’s why tests are done. I don’t need the details of what went wrong. Americans just need to know that it has been fixed. And if it takes time to determine and fix the problem, so be it.


7 posted on 05/22/2019 9:53:16 AM PDT by tennmountainman (Liberals Are Baby Killers)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: rktman

SpaceX didn’t kill Gus Grissom & Co. Neither did NASA. Accidents happens. Expensive equipment is destroyed and people die. This business in dangerous. But SpaceX has made incredible, inspiring breakthroughs that is resurrecting the American space program. Would the author prefer we depend 100% on Russia, as Obama did?


8 posted on 05/22/2019 11:04:54 AM PDT by montag813
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PreciousLiberty
The author is an idiot.

That's insulting.

To idiots.

9 posted on 05/22/2019 11:08:03 AM PDT by NorthMountain (... the right of the peopIe to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: montag813

Yup. Challenger and Columbia. I knew those two better than I would have liked.


10 posted on 05/22/2019 11:08:33 AM PDT by rktman ( #My2ndAmend! ----- Enlisted in the Navy in '67 to protect folks rights to strip my rights. WTH?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: rktman

Not sure that Space X is a fiasco. Unlike NASA, they haven’t burned men alive in a pure O2 environment.

Mistakes happen., SpaceX is a private company. They don’t have to disclose mistakes to anyone except the contacted company.

People should lighten up.


11 posted on 05/22/2019 2:37:55 PM PDT by Vermont Lt (If we get Medicare for all, will we have to show IDs for service?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SunkenCiv

*ping*


12 posted on 05/22/2019 3:22:28 PM PDT by fieldmarshaldj (Who will think of the gerbils ? Just say no to Buttgiggity !)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: fieldmarshaldj
Thanks fieldmarshaldj. "Taxpayer-financed fiasco" my ass.

13 posted on 05/23/2019 12:08:52 AM PDT by SunkenCiv (Imagine an imaginary menagerie manager imagining managing an imaginary menagerie.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Yossarian

“Testing discovers errors...
...but when the Crewed Dragon’s sibling - the Cargo Dragon - attaches to the hyper-expensive and manned ISS on a regular basis...

...then NASA and SpaceX have a responsibility to better communicate the state of the investigation.”

The system in question isn’t present on uncrewed Dragon capsules. It’s an emergency escape system.

Sorry for the late reply...


14 posted on 05/29/2019 7:01:05 AM PDT by PreciousLiberty (Make America Greater Than Ever!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: PreciousLiberty
The system in question isn’t present on uncrewed Dragon capsules. It’s an emergency escape system.

Yes, only Crew Dragon has the SuperDraco rocket engines, BUT both have Draco thrusters, and both Draco and SuperDraco thrusters pull on the same hypergolic fuel supply in the craft.

Hence it is not unreasonable to imagine that there are at least some shared components between Crew and Cargo variants when it comes to that hypergolic fuel supply.

Someone told me yesterday on Twitter that NASA and SpaceX had stated at a press conference for the Cargo Dragon launch a few weeks ago that they were satisfied by "working through the fault tree" that the same issue (still not truly known) that caused the explosion could not happen on Cargo Dragon. I guess that is the answer I was looking for. NASA and SpaceX really should have communicated that in a more obvious way.

15 posted on 05/29/2019 7:19:03 AM PDT by Yossarian
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson