Posted on 04/24/2019 2:31:29 AM PDT by Libloather
**SNIP**
Speaking at the inaugural Time 100 Summit, Pelosi also called the Trump administration an existential threat to our democracy in terms of our Constitution, when asked about what her party's response should be to the findings of special counsel Robert Mueller's report on Russian attempts to influence the 2016 presidential election. Its about the presentation of the facts, and when we have the facts well have a better idea of how we go forward.
**SNIP**
What we did learn is that the Russians had a systemic overall assault on our electoral system and what we also did see is that the president of the United States engaged in a behavior that was unethical, unscrupulous and beneath the dignity of the office that he holds, Pelosi said.
Whats surprising about it, she continued, is the Republicans seem to have an unlimited appetite for this kind of behavior, and instead of being ashamed of what that report said they gave their blessing once again to the president.
(Excerpt) Read more at news.yahoo.com ...
The Hillary report is on deck.
For a second I thought SanFranNan was talking about her personal problem with incontinence....?
why have you changed your tune Nance? I want to know what Dirt trunp has on you and your cohorts. I can’t wait, This next election should be one hell of a fire fight.
[1] the assertion is simply false. The Russians spent a minimal amount, about $100,000, on Facebook ads that could not possibly represent a "systematic overall assault" on our electoral system. Hillary Clinton spent something in excess of $1 billion.
[2] the assertion that the president behaved unethically, unscrupulously, or beneath the dignity of the office is at best a conflation of his perfectly true public pronouncements concerning the "witch hunt" and his private fulminations about the unfairness of the witch hunt. To conclude that these pronouncements somehow are unethical or unscrupulous or beneath the dignity of the office requires a very selective memory when it comes to the behavior of Kennedy, Johnson, Clinton and Obama whose behavior was objectively and substantively far worse, even criminal, than the most negative inferences that can be drawn about Trump.
Speaker Pelosi raises the bar describing the dignity of the office to apply to Trump the minute he was inaugurated.
why have you changed your tune Nance? I want to know what Dirt trump has on you and your cohorts. I can’t wait, This next election should be one hell of a fire fight.
Pelosi is one of a few dinosaurs that are still alive.
She is a freaking dinosaur you are right. Also shes a coward all talk and no action shes a coward. Shes done nothing except screw things for power. Her district is filled with nothing but poop and needles and Silicon Valley. The silicone valley money and artificial intelligence and San Francisco is filled with poop brilliant Nancy brilliant.
“Impeachment, by definition is a political act!”
Right. And isn’t there a “high crimes and misdemeanors” requirement, too? And don’t the high crimes and misdemeanors have to have been committed while in office? (Bubba committed perjury while in office.)
So why is Elijah Cummings asking for Trump’s records from before his presidency? They aren’t pertinent.
What Constitution is she reading? Is there a restriction on conservatives getting elected president? If there were any requirements for work history or a functioning brain, Obama wouldn't have qualified. We all know he didn't qualify on the citizenship question.
Nice try, Nance...
Trying to convince us that, when you begin the impeachment process, that there is legitimate evidence of high crimes and misdemeanors, not just a serious case of Trump derangement syndrome?
Good luck with that...
One other thing. Pelosi sign the document stating Obama was the Rats convention choice to be their presidential candidate, not one that said he was qualified under the Constitution as I recall. I think she had to sign a second statement stating he was qualified, so he could get on the ballot in Hawaii. The Democraps in Hawaii knew he wasn’t qualified and need the second statement from Pelosi for cover.
Yes, Nancy Pelosi is a vile, nasty, dishonest individual who is inclined to tyranny. She is a perfect example of a career politician who hangs on to political power and authority without any notable accomplishments in any other sphere of human activity.
You aren’t fooling anyone, Nancy Pants.
To conclude that these pronouncements somehow are unethical or unscrupulous or beneath the dignity of the office requires a very selective memory when it comes to the behavior of Kennedy, Johnson, Clinton and Obama whose behavior was objectively and substantively far worse, even criminal, than the most negative inferences that can be drawn about Trump.
For attempting to discredit his accusers, President Trump is accused of obstructing justice???? His claims of innocence are indicative of his guilt????
Isnt this particular fallacy the very definition of a witch hunt?
Come 2020, I hope the absurdity of all this is not totally lost on the voting public.
One foot on the boat and the other on the dock.
Gonna be fun watching Nancy try to split the baby over
the next year and a half.
Your assessment is dead on. He was angry and acted out because of illegal spying, illegal investigations, dirty political tricks, and absolute disregard of the Constitution by Democrats and the last POTUS illegal actions. This anger isn’t beneath the office, it SHOULD BE EXPECTED.
President Trump
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.