Posted on 04/22/2019 8:48:12 AM PDT by SeekAndFind
The decennial census doesn’t take place until next year, but there are annual population surveys being conducted every year around the country. The news from 2018 wasn’t particularly good for Baltimore, Maryland, however. Once again, rather than demonstrating any sort of growth, Charm City actually decreased in population and the losses were felt across virtually all demographic and economic lines. This is particularly distressing when you consider that Baltimore was once the nation’s sixth largest city. (NY Post)
New annual estimates from the US Census Bureau show that Baltimore is continuing to shed inhabitants, bringing the overall population of Maryland’s biggest city down to what it was over 100 years ago.
The latest Census data shows that Baltimore lost more than 7,300 citizens during the 12 months that ended July 1. That’s a loss of 1.2% of the city’s population. It’s the fourth straight year of population decline for Baltimore while rival counties are attracting newcomers…
Census data released Thursday suggests the city’s population is now just over 600,000 people. The population of the metropolis nicknamed “Charm City” stood at roughly 730,000 in 1920.
Raise your hand if you’re surprised by this. Nobody? Okay.
Plenty of states and cities experience temporary fluctuations in population for a variety of reasons. The only way to really gauge what’s going on is to look at the bigger picture over an extended period of time. And what we’re seeing in Baltimore is far from a statistical glitch. The last time the city’s population was this low was probably in the 19th century since they were already up to 720,000 by the 1920 census. In the 1950s the population was nearly a million.
The reasons for the slow decline from there varied from generation to generation. The closure of Bethlehem Steel and the collapse of business in the shipyards set the tone for much of the second half of the twentieth century, but since then issues of economic opportunity and racial divisiveness have become endemic. And the past few years, particularly since the Freddie Gray riots, have seen those problems becoming acute.
At the same time, Baltimore’s elected officials haven’t exactly covered themselves in glory in the 21st century. They haven’t had a mayor since Martin O’Malley who wasn’t mired in a cloud of scandal. Shelia Dixon resigned after being convicted on charges of fraud. Her successor, Stephanie Rawlings-Blake threw in the towel after her mishandling of the riots. And now, Catherine Pugh is hanging on by her fingernails because of the BookGate scandal. It’s rather hard to have confidence in your city and stick around with leadership like that.
Can anything turn Baltimore around? I’m just enough of a starry-eyed optimist to say that it’s possible, but they will need to make big changes. Any sort of urban revitalization will require tearing down vast tracks of vacant buildings that provide a breeding ground for the drug trade and gang violence. The streets will have to be made safe again and something must be done about the staggering murder rate. If you can’t provide viable real estate for investors and show that it’s actually safe to live and work there, nobody is going to come to rebuild the area.
Sadly, none of that will happen if you keep electing the same old crew of corrupt or incompetent people. I’m not saying they need to start electing Republicans (which would be asking a lot in Baltimore) but you at least have to find some honest and competent Democrats. If you can’t manage that much, just abandon ship and let Baltimore sink back into the harbor.
the problem is, wherever they go, they are taking their baltimore politics with them
Not good news. The virus is spreading.
Not surprising. Rampant crime. City services, road maintenance e.g., are a joke. The summers are sweltering. And the Orioles are terrible.
Not a good thing. They’re moving out, infiltrating and infesting our cities and towns.
Gee-I wonder why?
Why not give it to the illegals?
That is exactly what they will do; it is what they are doing in NJ’s dying cities and surrounding suburbs. It is the primary reason why smaller fish in government are OK with the elites’ population replacement plan; they need subjects to rule, and uneducated people with no traditions rooted in the Magna Carta, Bill of Rights, etc. is just fine with them. Compliant bipedal livestock...
When the urban unproductives start heading out, it is in search of a healthier host - nothing more. Here in NJ, broke cities are trying to farm out their permanent welfare caste to other municipalities with tax bases (working people) who will pay for their public education, emergency services, etc. - because the cities can’t anymore, and the state is also broke (the injections of white peoples’ money have dried up).
Yet another example of the end result of liberal government. Decline and decay. Turning once vibrant cities into wastelands. I guess more taxes and another racism conference will result in a good solution.
There is nothing charming about Charm City.
It is called “running out of other peoples’ money”.
And Martin O’Malley, when he was mayor was handing the city to the illegals and to druggies, and it’s been downhill ever since.
Are people leaving, or just murdering each other?
Maybe liberals don’t even want to live in a city run down the tubes by liberals.
Our elites seethe because they can’t tie productive people to these areas; they want de facto slavery of working people (and company owners) to pay for their urban livestock, and they need to nationalize their socialism so there are no “greener pastures”. This is a real problem in the NYC metro area; a couple of years ago, NJ had to adjust its state budget because our wealthiest resident (David Tepper - ONE MAN) packed up & left. Our bloated bureaucracies have become so dependent on constantly-increasing taxation that both employers and employees are fleeing, and there is no legal way to stop them. The older the sh!thole, the higher the accumulated debts and the larger the government employee castes.
My office is in Baltimore and I live in the far suburbs. I’ve also only lived here for ten years.
In my dream world, a Trumpian type strong businessman who is not a democrat would run a well funded “What have you got to lose” campaign and would burn down the establishment by literally firing every single city employee and shrinking government massively.
Of course, that will never happen in a town that elects only democrats.
Wouldn’t that be an interesting statistic? Net population loss compared to the murder rate?
Philly in some ways similar, yet somehow managing a widespread gentrification/renaissance.
Not to defend the scumbag, but at least the Green Zones around the harbor were safe when he was mayor. His cops could do the stop and frisk and hassle the ferals pretty much unimpeded. Then the string of female negro mayors began and each one has left the city worse off than the last one. The only way for the city to turn around is for a cessation of all gang activity. If that the incarceration or extermination of every gang member no matter what the race or age, then so be it. Including their lawyers and other enablers like public officials, the enablers, would also be necessary.
Get a grip, Baltimore. You are losing tourist $$$$, until you make the harbor safe.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.