I’m not sure Cain was a solid pick in the first place. He’s good for A role in Washington, but probably not THIS one. I’m not a fan of putting people on the Fed board who are primarily political/media figures.
RE: I’m not sure Cain was a solid pick in the first place. He’s good for A role in Washington, but probably not THIS one.
Herman Cain HAS EXPERIENCE with Federal Reserve.
He was chairman of the Federal Reserve Bank of Kansas City Omaha Branch from 1989 to 1991. He was deputy chairman, from 1992 to 1994, and then chairman until 1996, of the Federal Reserve Bank of Kansas City.
He is MORE THAN QUALIFIED. The opposition to his nomination is POLITICAL and has nothing to do with qualification or competence.
Agreed. There are BETTER qualified Conservatives for this role.
Cain is qualified. He was the chairman of the Federal Reserve Bank of Kansas City’s Omaha branch from 1989 to 1991, and the chairman of the entire Kansas City Fed in 1995 and 1996.
And personally, I’m fed up with these evil lifelong promiscuous Democrat women accusing Republicans of misconduct years and years after it supposedly happened. It needs to be ignored from now on.
By the way, Romney owns the company that owns the voting machines used in the Utah election. I seriously question his legitimacy.
You are truly ignorant of facts, but that's probably because as a kanuck, you have an ice cream brain cramp all year round.
Herman Cain had been a member of the fed bank in KC for years, but you didn't know that.
You are about the same as auntie maxine axing the bankers about student loans a coupla days ago. Get some facts before you lip-shoot.