Posted on 04/08/2019 2:52:58 AM PDT by Kaslin
Last weekend, a large number of Democratic Party Presidential candidates attended the National Action Network convocation, hosted by the "Reverend" Al Sharpton. The major topic of discussion? Reparations for slavery. Specifically, the audience and leadership pressed the candidates on whether they would sign off on legislation to convene a separate commission to looking into reparations for those adversely impacted by the “peculiar institution." They all agreed to do so, even the more-hesitant (and formerly moderate) presidential candidate John Hickenlooper, the former Governor of Colorado.
Perhaps all this political pandering isn’t worthy of our attention. After all, these presidential candidates promised to sign a bill to convene a commission—nothing more, right? It’s not as though the bill will end up on their desk as long as divided government remains the norm in D.C. But still, the fact that this issue has come up for discussion in a major political party...Seriously?
For decades, reparations was a benign talking point, another line of virtue-signaling from the academic chatterati. These “professionals” never worked a real job in their lives. They declared their express interest to undermine the United States from the isolated safety of their ivory towers. To the rest of us little people, their reparations talk was fundamentally silly. Few people even noticed. Today, this silly idea has become a serious concern, a point of departure for one of the mainstream political parties in the United States. We need to discuss this so that we can dispute and dismiss it effectively.
The first question that should come to everyone’s mind: who should get reparations? All the slaves, now former slaves, have all passed on. Where should any funding go? Consider the contrasting reparations issue with the Japanese-Americans interned during World War II. Within years, a movement for reparations followed. Presidents Ronald Reagan and George Bush signed off on explicit legislation directed to Americans whose property had been unfairly taken or forced into sale. Regarding the slavery issue, a contentious matter that was once a dark blight on our nation’s otherwise bright history, the issue of “paying back” is more complicated. Who today was harmed by slavery then? Most black Americans today have a tenuous connection with an enslaved ancestor. Many more Americans of African heritage or descend have no such connection. On the surface, ultimately, let’s call this demand for material retribution what it really is: outrageous!
However, if liberals and race-baiting interests insist reparations, then let's talk about this. What would widespread reparations really need to be? Will there be a discussion on reparations to the descendants of white slaves? Yes, they existed, they worked in different levels of involuntary servitude in the American colonies. Check out White Cargo or do a casual Google search for more information.
What about for the hundreds of thousands of (white) men who died on fields of battle to end slavery. Where are their reparations? OK, they all died. What about for their children, or the extended families of these men who died so that men would live free on American soil? Many children lost their fathers on those fields. They sacrificed a great deal, too. They lost so much because of slavery.
Are reparationists going to confront the American Indian tribes which had enslaved black people, including tribes which insisted on holding onto black slaves even after the Civil War ended? As one of many political inconvenient truths about the slave trade, American Indians enslaved black people, sold them, and stole the fruit of their labor. It’s astonishing to learn that many of the native groups refused to give up their slaves even after the passage of the 13th, 14th, and 15th Amendments!
Will that politically incorrect history bother the “reparations raiders”? That’s nothing compared to the long-suppressed yet very true history of the black—yes black—slave owners which emerged throughout the United States up to and throughout the Civil War. The first slave-owner in the colonial North America was Anthony Johnson, a black indentured servant who worked for his freedom from that bond. He became a slaveholder and plantation-owner himself. He even sued in court for the right to own a black man! Blacks enslaved thousands of other blacks in the United States, and they even helped bankroll the Confederacy up to its defeat at Appomattox Court House. Most people still don't know about black slave owners, including history teachers and professors. Will reparations seekers pursue the descendants of those slave owners?
Why not make demands on African countries, too? They enshrined and dispersed the slave trade long before Europeans arrived. Will reparations extortionists extend their demands to Black Lives (Don't) Matter, whose racial hatred and violence burned down millions of dollars’ worth of black capital? Remember Ferguson? Much of that violence sprung out of the poisoned well of institutionalized victimization.
Besides all of this, former slaves already received reparations. After the civil war, black freedman received 40 acres and a mule because of "radical" Republicans, whose party had opposed slavery from their inception. Those same reparations were later denied to black slaves when Democrats came to power in Washington, D.C. and throughout the Post-Bellum South. In fact, it was the Democratic Party that renewed the push for involuntary servitude in the early 1800s. Five years before the outbreak of the Civil War, the Democratic Party was talking about allowing the re-importation of black slaves in the United States, which had been banned after 1808. When will the Democratic Party draw from its own campaign coffers and start paying back all the harm that they perpetrated against black people? If people are clamoring for reparations for slavery, they should pound on the DNC's door and shout "Pay Up!"
What a strange irony: Democratic Party Presidential candidates want to enact reparations, but it was their party that reinvigorated the slave trade, that made a business out of stealing labor from working people and giving it to those who do not work. For those clamoring for reparations, be careful what you wish for!
Where do I go to get my reparations from the Brits?
Of course we should bankrupt the Treasury over this. And don’t forget Warrens reparation for the Indians too. Oh, and I forgot the Green New Deals expenses as well. Silly me.
My Irish grandfather fought for the Brits in WW1. Circa 1975, there was an article in the paper that said the queen was going to be at the Military Ocean Terminal in Bayonne. I read tis to my grandfather. He immediately grabbed his cane, stood up and said “where’s my coat, she owes me money”.
How about taking that money and using it to eradicate modern day slavery?
The descendants of Ishmael practice/practiced slavery. I hear it was/is more pervasive, violent, and deadly in comparison.
Perhaps the proposed reparations budget should go to stop present abuses of freedom rather than those of the past?
The Democrat Party has fought for over 200 hundred years to keep people in perpetual bondage in one form or another. In the spirit of reparations we should do the following:
RICO the Democrat Party and its ancillary groups, i.e. the SPLC, NOW, Planned Parenthood, etc. Seize and liquidate all of their assets with proceeds going to all citizens who can prove that they were held in slavery in the United States.
Anything left over should be used to halting the slave trade to and from the United States. Build the wall and step up interdiction.
Produce reparations in stocks, cashable after 15 years—IF not convicted of a felony or misdemeanor.
Let’s count welfare, Section 8 housing, free education, free healthcare and any other freebies they already get as Reparations.
Cut them off when they get to $60,000 worth of services.
Debt paid in full.
But... remember they can’t be called victims anymore and will have to pull their own weight in America from now on.
Do indeed be careful of what you wish for.
Do liberals have the mental capacity to understand this? Do liberals realize this money comes from their taxes?
Every day I'm amazed by further proof of the abject stupidity of liberals. It boggles the mind.
bump for later
Do not forget to deduct the price of freedom from that
This entire debacle is because of a spelling error. What was really meant by the liberals is repatriation, because they wanted to replace blacks in this country with illegal aliens. By sending blacks back to the motherland, there will now be room to house, feed and exploit illegals for political purposes.
The is a clear violation of the 14th Amendment that provides for equal protection under the law. Blacks make up 12-16% of the population. They have been sucking up welfare since it’s inception. I hope LBJ rots in hell for his Great Society and Vietnam.
My progenitor Irishmen sold into indentured servitude never received 40 acres and a mule. Where’s my reparations?
My grandparents were born in Ireland.
Where do I go to get my reparations from the Brits?
***************************
The Japanese invaded and my dad, his brother and his parents were in a Japanese concentration camp for Europeans for three years, after release the Chinese Communists confiscated their house and property, as part of the peace agreement, the US agreed to make no claims against the new Japanese government, so where do I get my reparations for what happened to my dad?
“What about for the hundreds of thousands of (white) men who died on fields of battle to end slavery.”
Of course, that never happened. As Lincoln said, the war was fought to preserve the Union (in a fashion that had not existed prior to the War Between the States, i.e., a strong central government).
That aside, OK, I say let’s DO give them their reparations. Compensate them for what they lost as free Africans. Men and women get one loin cloth (sorry, nothing for up top, ladies). Men get one spear, women get a straw basket. That’s pretty much all they lost other than a straw or mud hut...so I guess we could throw in a basic tent.
Right now, they just want the votes. They can promise anything and blame the republicans if it doesn't come to be.
Is this stupidity? Not if your objective is to get votes.
Me of the 4chan kids came up with something new. The idea of giving the same amount to descendants of Union soldiers as descendants of slaves. If this idea takes hold it could fly.
This guy must have read my posts...
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.