The nytimes and jama. Can't get more honest than that. Never mind the size of an axe, machete, knife, baseball bat, tire iron. fist, shoe size etc., etc., etc....... I really don't like these people.
1 posted on
03/31/2019 8:13:00 PM PDT by
rktman
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-43 next last
To: rktman
Of course it could help in ammo selection to take care of those with criminal intent on your person.
2 posted on
03/31/2019 8:13:49 PM PDT by
rktman
( #My2ndAmend! ----- Enlisted in the Navy in '67 to protect folks rights to strip my rights. WTH?)
To: rktman
What a load of crap. I’m keeping my bullets, big and small, and the likes of the Noo Yawk Times ain’t got nothing to say about it.
3 posted on
03/31/2019 8:14:36 PM PDT by
backwoods-engineer
(Enjoy the decline of the American empire.)
To: rktman
4 posted on
03/31/2019 8:14:39 PM PDT by
Deaf Smith
(When a Texan takes his chances, chances will be taken that's fore sure)
To: rktman
What the? Smaller bullets? You stupid son’sa
....oh, wait, I get it. April Fool’s!
5 posted on
03/31/2019 8:16:33 PM PDT by
Texas Eagle
(If it wasn't for double-standards, Liberals woulld have no stacandairds at all -- Texas Eagle)
To: rktman
Safer guns and safer bullets. Jocelyn whatshername.
L
7 posted on
03/31/2019 8:18:21 PM PDT by
Lurker
(Peaceful coexistence with the Left is not possible. Stop pretending it is.)
To: rktman
5.56 is a .22.
Just sayin.
.
8 posted on
03/31/2019 8:19:03 PM PDT by
Seaplaner
(Never give in-never, never,never...except to convictions of honour and good sense. Winston Churchill)
To: rktman
OMG!!! So the thug fires more bullets!!!
Now, that was hard to figure out wasn’t it?
9 posted on
03/31/2019 8:21:42 PM PDT by
Wuli
To: rktman
I am grateful for this article. I will quit packing my 22 and start carrying my 357 /s
Bigger bullets bleed better.
To: rktman
12 posted on
03/31/2019 8:24:52 PM PDT by
yefragetuwrabrumuy
("Desperate swarm sewage drains for water..." Venezuelans or D.C. Swamp denizens?)
To: rktman
Without explicitly stating it, the Times is pusing for the U.S. to follow “global norms” for civilian firearms ownership by banning military calibers.
13 posted on
03/31/2019 8:25:30 PM PDT by
SecondAmendment
(This just proves my latest theory ... LIBERALS RUIN EVERYTHING!)
To: rktman
14 posted on
03/31/2019 8:25:50 PM PDT by
Paladin2
To: rktman
Even more lives could be saved if bullets were made of cotton.
15 posted on
03/31/2019 8:26:31 PM PDT by
TigersEye
(This is the age of the death of reason.)
To: rktman
So, if you want a criminal to die, the .45 would appear to be the weapon of choice. The article ends up being a market endorsement of the 1911.
16 posted on
03/31/2019 8:33:25 PM PDT by
lurk
To: rktman
Gun Control Kills People
... Democrats kill people with Gun Control.
17 posted on
03/31/2019 8:33:36 PM PDT by
TheNext
(Democrats kill people with Gun Control)
To: rktman
From the JAMA article: "The findings are foundational to the debate over whether deadly weapons should be better regulated and provide evidence against the common view that whether the victim lives or dies is determined largely by the assailants intent and not the type of weapon." ....... "These 367 cases were divided into 3 groups by caliber: small (.22, .25, and .32), medium (.38, .380, and 9 mm), or large (.357 magnum, .40, .44 magnum, .45, 10 mm, and 7.62 × 39 mm)." (Of course, the .357 and the 9mm are almost the same, and the 7.62 is smaller.) ..... "he probability of death is connected to the intrinsic power and lethality of the weapon. That suggests that effective regulation of firearms could reduce the homicide rate. That conclusion is relevant to the national debate over gun regulation, although insufficient in itself to demonstrate that any particular regulation would satisfy a cost-benefit test." Looks like I should move up from my 9mm, although the study didn't address the differences between FMJ and JHP.
19 posted on
03/31/2019 8:38:01 PM PDT by
VanShuyten
("...that all the donkeys were dead. I know nothing as to the fate of the less valuable animals.")
To: rktman
The assertion that criminals go for big calibres is laughable.
They go for cheap and available. Typically 9mm. Shot placement is key.
This article is pseudoscience.
21 posted on
03/31/2019 8:39:24 PM PDT by
Bogey78O
(So far so good.)
To: rktman
I actually took a quick look at the article. They show .38 Special as a “medium” caliber round and a .357 magnum as a “large” caliber round. Of course they are the same “caliber”, that’s why you can shoot .38s out of a .357 magnum revolver.
The fact that they don’t seem to understand this makes me wonder what else they don’t understand about firearms.
After all, the dreaded AR15 “assault rifle” shoots a tiny .22 caliber round and the article seems to imply that if people only used .22 (’small caliber’) rounds, why gun deaths would go down.
22 posted on
03/31/2019 8:39:30 PM PDT by
hanamizu
To: rktman
NYT and handgun ballistics? I think Ill pass.
25 posted on
03/31/2019 8:44:19 PM PDT by
Spok
To: rktman
Did they mention 12 gauge slugs? .72 caliber bullets, baby. Those can definitely ruin your day.
27 posted on
03/31/2019 8:45:22 PM PDT by
Disambiguator
(Keepin' it analog.)
To: rktman
New Law, all Swimming Pools can only be six inches deep.
29 posted on
03/31/2019 8:47:42 PM PDT by
Kickass Conservative
(Democracy, two Wolves and one Sheep deciding what's for Dinner.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-43 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson