[ding_dong_daddy_from_dumas]

I hate bills that use extremely vague words.

From the Institute for Free speech: Specifically, H.R. 1 would: Unconstitutionally regulate speech that mentions a federal candidate or elected official at any time under a severely vague, subjective, and broad standard that asks whether the speech “promotes,” “attacks,” “opposes,” or “supports” (“PASO”) the candidate or official.

[Grampa Dave]

You must hate all bills:

“I hate bills that use extremely vague words.”

[Freedom'sWorthIt]

Thank you so much! Yes, this is the entity that was represented in this committee hearing that I saw on cspan. I have been searching for its contents.

THANKS!

[Freedom'sWorthIt]

All - thanks to ding_dong_daddy_from_dumas in post #52, we have the essence of the hearing on Cspan although it does not include Congressman Jordan’s questions, it points out exactly what is in this huge monstrosity of a dangerous bill. From The Institute for Free Speech.

https://www.ifs.org/expert-analysis/analysis-of-h-r-1-part-one/

I did an email from Sen. McConnell’s website to encourage him to definitely prevent this bill, HR1, from coming to the Senate Floor and to thank him (I know, I know) for his work to prevent the leftists in the House from succeeding with their determination to destroy our country.