Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

ACLU blasts Democrats' election bill as unconstitutional
Washington Times ^ | 3/4/19 | Stephen Dinan

Posted on 03/04/2019 11:14:46 PM PST by Freedom'sWorthIt

The American Civil Liberties Union dealt a blow Monday to Democrats’ new election overhaul legislation, saying the bill does too much damage to the First Amendment and the storied rights group cannot support it.

ACLU officials said they support parts of the bill, such as making it easier to register to vote, but said the legislation attempts to control even the mere mention of a politician, which goes too far.

“They will have the effect of harming our public discourse by silencing necessary voices that would otherwise speak out about the public issues of the day,” the ACLU’s national political director and senior legislative counsel wrote in a 13-page letter announcing opposition.

Democrats plan to put the bill, H.R. 1, on the chamber floor for a vote later this week.

(Excerpt) Read more at washingtontimes.com ...


TOPICS: Breaking News; Crime/Corruption; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: 2020election; abortion; aclu; alert; brettkavanaugh; democrats; despotism; destruction; dnctalkingpoint; dnctalkingpoints; election2020; electionbill; elections; electoralcollege; faithlesselectors; maga; mediawingofthednc; nationalpopularvote; npv; partisanmediashills; presstitutes; scotus; smearmachine; tyranny
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100101-104 next last
To: All

Please go down to the Executive summary on this website of the Free Speech Institute’s analysis of HR 1.

Just a few of the provisions in this nightmare of a bill:

- Subject far more issue ads to burdensome disclaimer requirements, which will coerce groups into truncating their substantive message and make some advertising, especially online, practically impossible.

- Likely eliminate the ability of many employees to make voluntary contributions through employee-funded PACs, which give employees a voice in the political process with respect to issues that affect their livelihoods.

- Effectively prohibit many domestic subsidiaries, and perhaps most corporations with even a single foreign shareholder with voting shares, from making independent expenditures, contributions to super PACs, or contributions to candidates for state and local office, thus usurping the laws in more than half of the states that allow such contributions.

This appears to be a thinly veiled artifice to overturn Citizens United and to unconstitutionally accomplish by legislation what congressional Democrats failed to achieve by constitutional amendment in 2014.

- Disproportionately burden the political speech rights of corporations, thereby ending the long-standing parity in the campaign finance law between corporations and unions.

- Increase regulation of the online speech of American citizens while purporting to address the threat of Russian propaganda.

- Expand the universe of regulated online political speech (by Americans) beyond paid advertising to include, apparently, communications on groups’ or individuals’ own websites and e-mail messages.

- Make broadcast, cable, satellite, and Internet media platforms liable if they allow political advertising by prohibited speakers to slip through, thereby driving up the costs of political advertising, especially for online ads where compliance costs are relatively high.

Impose inflexible disclaimer requirements on online ads that may make many forms of small, popular, and cost-effective ads off-limits for (American) political advertisers.

THese are just some of the provisions.

Chilling.


61 posted on 03/05/2019 9:35:18 AM PST by Freedom'sWorthIt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies]

To: Freedom'sWorthIt

Thanks FW!

Really appreciate.


62 posted on 03/05/2019 9:36:44 AM PST by Fightin Whitey
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies]

To: Fightin Whitey

You are very welcome.


63 posted on 03/05/2019 9:40:52 AM PST by Freedom'sWorthIt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 62 | View Replies]

To: Freedom'sWorthIt

“They will have the effect of harming our public discourse by silencing necessary voices that would otherwise speak out about the public issues of the day,”

That’s the whole point of the bill. The First Amendment only covers flag burning and taking a knee, and preventing anyone from putting up nativity scenes./s


64 posted on 03/05/2019 9:55:31 AM PST by Eleutheria5 (If you are not prepared to use force to defend civilization, then be prepared to accept barbarism.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Eleutheria5

That’s right. Exactly.


65 posted on 03/05/2019 9:57:12 AM PST by Freedom'sWorthIt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies]

To: Freedom'sWorthIt

Thank you!


66 posted on 03/05/2019 9:59:03 AM PST by laplata (The Left/Progressives have diseased minds.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies]

To: laplata

You are very welcome!


67 posted on 03/05/2019 9:59:33 AM PST by Freedom'sWorthIt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 66 | View Replies]

To: laplata; All

Found this summary on the linked website:

H.R. 1 is clearly a slapdash legislative vehicle that stitches together prior standalone bills comprised of unworkable and likely unconstitutional provisions that rightfully went nowhere. For this reason, the bill may seem like an unserious political ploy that is unlikely to pass the Senate or to be signed into law. Nonetheless, it should be examined carefully and subjected to critical pushback. As the first bill to be introduced in the House of Representatives for the 116th Congress, H.R. 1 is a disturbing statement of legislative priorities that does not augur well for efforts to protect free speech and associational and donor privacy for the rest of this Congress.


68 posted on 03/05/2019 10:05:04 AM PST by Freedom'sWorthIt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 66 | View Replies]

To: Freedom'sWorthIt

Welcome to the reality in Canada. Ezra Levant made the mistake of criticizing a government official from the Canadian Human Rights tribunal and was sued successfully for defamation. The message is do NOT criticize government officials - at least not publicly. Sounds like the Democrats want the same thing for you guys.


69 posted on 03/05/2019 10:39:37 AM PST by Sam Gamgee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sam Gamgee

Wow! Canada sounds like the new USSR and the USA is fast moving to that same condition should the Dems get full power.


70 posted on 03/05/2019 10:41:29 AM PST by Freedom'sWorthIt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 69 | View Replies]

To: Freedom'sWorthIt

Yes. His crime was to critique a non-elected official. Bashing elected politicians is still OK, but Trudeau is trying to pass a law to even restrict the ability of third parties to do so of elected officials. Here the RCMP, our version of the FBI, has ZERO oversight. Well, it technically is under the purview of Parliament, but that is too clunky and too slow. They consistently run rough shod over our rights, especially gun rights. We have Human Rights commissions and they are essentially our thought police.


71 posted on 03/05/2019 10:51:04 AM PST by Sam Gamgee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 70 | View Replies]

To: Sam Gamgee

Oh my. Not good. So sorry to know this. Trudeau has to go. Praying this doesn’t come to America but it will when / if the Dims take full control...this will happen and worse.


72 posted on 03/05/2019 11:00:10 AM PST by Freedom'sWorthIt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 71 | View Replies]

To: Freedom'sWorthIt

America is the bulwark. If the Deep State prevails it is game over for the rest of the free world. I guess that is why all their resources and players are gunning for the USA these days.


73 posted on 03/05/2019 11:12:17 AM PST by Sam Gamgee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 72 | View Replies]

To: Sam Gamgee

Is there any hope for Canada?


74 posted on 03/05/2019 11:14:44 AM PST by Freedom'sWorthIt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 73 | View Replies]

To: Freedom'sWorthIt; DoughtyOne
Thanks. Nobody should think that the problems of interpretation of poorly written laws is limited to the courts. The deep state bureaucracy would gain power as well (recall obamacare regs are supposed to be 30 times as big as the original text of the law). Maybe the FEC would want to hire 1,000 or more new employees, not to mention the DOJ.

What's the best way to grow the bureaucracy? Pass laws that need "interpretation." The resulting regs would be likely to lean (or shove) toward the left.

75 posted on 03/05/2019 11:18:17 AM PST by ding_dong_daddy_from_dumas (Mozart tells you what it's like to be human. Bach tells you what it's like to be the universe)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies]

To: ding_dong_daddy_from_dumas
is are
76 posted on 03/05/2019 11:19:47 AM PST by ding_dong_daddy_from_dumas (Mozart tells you what it's like to be human. Bach tells you what it's like to be the universe)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 75 | View Replies]

To: Freedom'sWorthIt

Not really. While the UK is on the fast track we are on the slow track to oblivion. Conservatives only win elections by a happy accident of vote splitting between the NDP and Liberal Party.

Canada has not ONE conservative newspaper or news channel. It really doesn’t even have conservative think tanks. There is the taxpayer federation, but its mandate is not partisan, and is not that influential.

We are also flooding the nation with so called Syrian refugees. 20 years from now I think major cities will have rape epidemics from this.

Conservative Parties here have thrown in the towel. Abortion is not even allowed to be discussed.


77 posted on 03/05/2019 11:20:46 AM PST by Sam Gamgee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 74 | View Replies]

To: ding_dong_daddy_from_dumas

Well said.


78 posted on 03/05/2019 11:21:29 AM PST by Freedom'sWorthIt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 75 | View Replies]

To: Sam Gamgee

OH, dear Lord. I am so sorry to read your info.

But if America sleeps, the same things will happen here.


79 posted on 03/05/2019 11:23:03 AM PST by Freedom'sWorthIt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 77 | View Replies]

To: Freedom'sWorthIt

Very scary.

God help us if/when the Dems have the White House and both houses of congress.


80 posted on 03/05/2019 11:42:01 AM PST by laplata (The Left/Progressives have diseased minds.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 68 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100101-104 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson