Posted on 02/25/2019 5:15:31 PM PST by yesthatjallen
Republican legislative leaders have appealed a court ruling striking down new North Carolina constitutional amendments mandating photo identification to vote and lower caps on income tax rates.
The notice filed on Monday with the Court of Appeals challenges Fridays decision by a Wake County judge voiding legislative directives to put the amendments on the ballot and voter approval of them in November.
Judge Bryan Collins ruled the 2017-18 General Assembly that approved the amendment referendums last year were illegally established because federal courts had declared legislative district boundaries illegal gerrymanders.
(Excerpt) Read more at apnews.com ...
Maybe the best thing for everyone would be for the courts to take over every aspect of legislation, and all exercise of executive power.
For the common good.
/s
Judicial Dictators..
A County judge has more power than Government ?
That was the most bizarre ruling I’ve ever read.
Tosses Bananas because of Oranges ?
Thanks yesthatjallen.
We are Rome.
“Republican legislative leaders have appealed a court ruling striking down new North Carolina constitutional amendments mandating photo identification to vote and lower caps on income tax rates.”
You don’t appeal a wrong court decision, you dumbasses, you impeach and remove the black-robe fascists.
It’s becoming more apperent that the duty to remove black-robe Nazis will fall to the citizens.
State legislatures create the Laws but a county Judge can say , no no you can’t have that Law ,LOL, Without state legislatures making the Laws there would be no Judges ,LOL
His decision intentionally ignores the fact that both were ballot initiatives, and both passed by the voters with huge majorities, so that no matter how the districts may have been drawn, they both would have passed easily. He should be removed from the bench for this naked activism.
They shouldnt even have to appeal - the ruling is nonsensical
These were constitutional amendments voted on by the People of NC.
They are not in his purview, no matter what his silly reasoning might be.
so is the judge saying the General Assembly are illegally established or the amendments are illegally established and voted on by the public, or just the districts are illegallly established?
He is saying “I’m a Democrat and I decide you Republicans have no say...”
Their Constitution has been ruled unconstitutional? By a judge?
Good!
This would have to be overturned by the appeals court, because by the argument of the judge, absolutely NOTHING the legislature did that year is “legal”.
Meaning that the budget is invalid, every appointment is overturned, every law passed is unpassed.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.