When will the Wiener’s stop with the kid stuff?
Maybe they’re just protecting their donor base.
I'm sure that makes sense to everybody who votes for Pelosi.
10 years is a huge age difference for underage people. How about just hands off the underage people, period.
Just crazy all the way around, including the existing law. Why should ANY sexual contact with a minor not require registration as a sex offender?
hmmm. So Calif wants to redefine ‘sexual intercourse’ as ‘vaginal’ intercourse? How convenient for sodomites and pervs.
An ageing male homosexual population given legal permission to groom and prey on male juveniles, and nobody wants to stand up in the state legislature and say, wtf?
“Weiner”?
Seriously?
That, alone, was almost enough to make me think the article had to be satire, but sadly, it is not.
Incremental steps toward full legalization and lowering of consent age through legislation, regrettably
They seek to normalize their behavior to achieve easier access to MOLEST YOUR CHILDREN!
>http://www.patheos.com/blogs/warrenthrockmorton/2009/06/05/a-major-study-of-child-abuse-and-homosexuality-revisited/<
On page 37, the other relevant result relates to men.
The 13th research question addressed, of homosexual men who have been molested, what percentage were molested before self-identification as homosexual men, and what percentage were molested after self-identification as homosexual? Of homosexual men who were molested, 68% were molested before self-identification as homosexual, and 32% were molested after self-identification as homosexual.
>https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5Q6pDGNQw3I<
The Left's Push For Pedophile Acceptance
It is a question as to whether the motivation for this proposed statute depends upon percentages.
Well over 90% of all sex offenders who prey upon children are male. The ratio of male-to-female child victims is about 50/50. The percentage of homosexuals in the general population ranges from 3-10%, depending upon whom one asks.
Does this not speak to an over-representation with respect to sexual preference vis-a-vis pedophilia? Is that why this bill was offered? Does a certain politically favored group merit exemption from laws enacted to protect children?
It is a question as to whether the motivation for this proposed statute depends upon percentages.
Well over 90% of all sex offenders who prey upon children are male. The ratio of male-to-female child victims is about 50/50. The percentage of homosexuals in the general population ranges from 3-10%, depending upon whom one asks.
Does this not speak to an over-representation with respect to sexual preference vis-a-vis pedophilia? Is that why this bill was offered? Does a certain politically favored group merit exemption from laws enacted to protect children?
Sounds like commiefornia is getting the government it voted for.
Just when you think CA demonrats can’t get any sicker.
They still have to vote on this, right?
A lot of states have somewhat similar laws. They are called “Romeo and Juliet” statues and provide exemptions for age of consent laws. But most are set less than 10 years.
Makes you wonder just why would someone write such a bill.
So 19 and 9 is Okay.....
sicko political hacks have destroyed the once-Golden State of Californication
Quick, let’s invade Venezuela & decriminalize homosexuality around the world while, here in the US, they are targeting our children for molestation & turning boys into girls at age 5.