Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

CA Democrats Author Bill to Protect Sex Offenders Who Lure Minors
California Globe ^ | February 19, 2019 | Katy Grimes

Posted on 02/21/2019 3:34:23 PM PST by walford

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-48 last
To: walford

Yeeeeeeeahhhhhh...

Corey Haim is one of those names that brings instant thread-shitting on this site. A few very vocal and prolific members of this site have officially branded him as a liar, attention-seeker and self-aggrandising arsehole, don’tcha know?

His name is almost as dangerous as Milo Yiannopoulos, who is also (apparently) persona non-grata, and never to be mentioned on this site. :P


41 posted on 02/21/2019 7:16:28 PM PST by Kriggerel ("All great truths are hard and bitter, but lies... are sweeter than wild honey" (Ragnar Redbeard))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: walford

Hey, don’t say that too loud. They just haven’t thought of it yet.


42 posted on 02/21/2019 8:33:14 PM PST by DoughtyOne
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: walford

2 wrongs don’t make a right


43 posted on 02/22/2019 4:45:04 AM PST by b4me (God Bless the USA)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: walford

Does Epstein have a house there yet? Bubba?


44 posted on 02/22/2019 4:46:31 AM PST by King Moonracer (Bad lighting and cheap fabric, that's how you sell clothing.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: walford

The present law already has a loop hole, if it is “vaginal intercourse” sex that is involved, and that loop hole relieves the offender from the no more 10 years older than the victim standard, IF a judge in the case finds cause for that relief. It apparently does not allow for a judge to provide that same relief if it is not a case involving vaginal intercourse, if it involves some other sexual acts.

The question concerning the new suggested law is if it goes beyond providing that same relief, in cases where it is not vaginal intercourse and just exempts ALL such offenders - based on the no more than 10 years older standard - from having to file with the sex offenders registry, instead of like the other cases, as it is now, putting that question in the hands of the judge hearing the case.

In no case does the matter of a conviction of the crime seem to come into question, just whether or not being put on the offenders registry is mandatory or not.


45 posted on 02/22/2019 10:13:30 AM PST by Wuli
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Fedora

She is the Eggman?? Kinda looks like the Walrus to me. coo coo ca chooo
46 posted on 02/22/2019 10:32:57 AM PST by Impala64ssa (Virtue signalling is no virtue)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: walford

The law is called ‘The NAMBLA Protection Act of 2019’. I hope they’ll defeat this.


47 posted on 02/22/2019 7:23:41 PM PST by Deplorable American1776 (Proud to be a DeplorableAmerican with a Deplorable Family...even the dog is, too. :-))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: walford

Exactly.


48 posted on 06/08/2022 12:58:10 AM PDT by NetAddicted (Just looking)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-48 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson